Chhakka Panja 5

Chakka Panja 5 brings back the much-loved humor and satire that the series is known for, while also tackling some pressing social issues. This installment dives into the themes of nepotism, corruption, and the struggles of the common man, all wrapped in the film's signature comedic style. As with previous entries, the film blends laughs with meaningful commentary, giving audiences more than just entertainment.

The cast delivers as expected, with Deepak Raj Giri, Jeetu Nepal, and the rest of the team effortlessly slipping back into their roles. Their comedic timing and chemistry are spot-on, making even the simplest scenes enjoyable. The jokes feel fresh and witty, drawing laughter from relatable experiences and social commentary. The addition of some new characters adds a refreshing touch, although the focus remains on the tried-and-true dynamic that fans have come to love.

Visually, the film stays true to the series' style, focusing on everyday settings that make the story feel grounded and familiar. The screenplay is tight for the most part, although there are a few scenes where the humor feels forced, and certain plot points could have been developed further. At times, the film leans heavily on familiar tropes, which might feel repetitive to some, but the strong performances help carry it through.

The Positives: . Though the first half feels a little slow the movie catches its pace and the screenplay will hold you till the end as the plot feels relatable and contemporary.

. Kedar Ghimire and Rajaram Poudyal's dialogue delivery and comic timing feels natural and funny.

. Both the main characters have pretty good depth to it, the acting is good.

. The negatives: . The movie follows the same old formula as its previous four parts which makes the storyline almost totally predictable and monotonous.

. Biggest disappointment is its lack of comedy as there are very few moments that actually feels funny.

. Below average cinematography, cliché sfx, and unnecessary songs.

. I will give it 4/10.

According to World population review, Nepal had the lowest IQ but this claim was already debunked with the release of this movie i will personally vouch for this survey. Absolute disaster i enjoyed 2015 earthquake more than this movie.

My cat can randomly steeped on keyboard and it will automatically have better story than this movie. If this is story is garbage than it's insult to the garbage.

Dialogue was so stupid and cringe. Stilted and unnatural, it felt as though the script was written by someone who had never actually heard people speak before. Attempts at humor fell flat, and emotional moments so cringe-worthy than i will rather see the overacting girl at my class.

Soundtrack is soo stupid and loud that i would rather hear a children cry in cinema hall than hear it's soundtrack. Imagine the emotional climax of a scene being interrupted by a jaunty polka tune. Yes, it was that bad. If you enjoy feeling like you're at a circus while watching a tragic love story, this movie has got you covered.

A person who is dumb can deliver better comedy through dialogues. This earning around 20 cr??? I would rather try to not breath for 2 hrs than watching it again.

I don't know why i paid 400 npr for the ticket i would rather have smoked all 400 npr worth of cigarette and be in a better condition.

Cast??? Youtubers can do better forget about them pre school drama has better actors than this bunch.

I can't remember the last time I felt so let down by a movie. From start to finish, it felt like it was shot on an iPhone-grainy visuals, awkward angles, and an overall lack of polish that made it hard to take seriously. While some indie films can charm with a low-budget feel, this one missed the mark completely. Instead of feeling intimate or raw, it just looked amateurish, like a rushed project that needed more time in production.

The characters, unfortunately, did nothing to save this film. They were so one-dimensional that it was hard to care about anything they were going through. No depth, no growth, and absolutely no emotional connection. It felt like the actors themselves weren't invested, and their performances reflected that. It was almost as if they were given just a few lines of background for their roles, with no thought put into who these people were or why we should care.

The quality of the movie overall was incredibly poor. The lighting was inconsistent, the sound was muffled in places, and the editing was sloppy, making it feel as though the film had been thrown together at the last minute. Scenes would abruptly cut off, leaving some moments feeling incomplete or pointless. Even the storytelling was disjointed, with poorly executed transitions and a lack of any real flow or cohesion.

Worst of all, it felt rushed. Ironically, despite the film dragging with its slow pacing, it somehow gave the impression that it was made in a hurry, without any attention to detail or care for the final product. It's frustrating because you can tell the idea behind the film could've been interesting if it were developed properly. Instead, it ended up being a confusing and unpolished mess that failed to deliver on every front.

In the end, this movie was a chore to sit through. Between the poor production quality, shallow characters, and a narrative that felt like it was going nowhere, I can't give it more than 2/10. It's one of those films that leaves you scratching your head, wondering how it made it past the editing room in this state. Save yourself the time-this one's a hard pass.