VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,1/10
1694
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Il regista conservatore Dinesh D'Souza analizza i numerosi tentativi di "eliminare" Donald Trump tramite giochi politici, diffamazione, cause legali e dei veri e propri attentati, ma nonosta... Leggi tuttoIl regista conservatore Dinesh D'Souza analizza i numerosi tentativi di "eliminare" Donald Trump tramite giochi politici, diffamazione, cause legali e dei veri e propri attentati, ma nonostante tutto l'ex-presidente resiste: vincerà?Il regista conservatore Dinesh D'Souza analizza i numerosi tentativi di "eliminare" Donald Trump tramite giochi politici, diffamazione, cause legali e dei veri e propri attentati, ma nonostante tutto l'ex-presidente resiste: vincerà?
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Foto
Joe Biden
- Self - U.S. President
- (filmato d'archivio)
Wolf Blitzer
- Self - T.V. Reporter
- (filmato d'archivio)
Tucker Carlson
- Self - Political Broadcaster
- (filmato d'archivio)
Hillary Clinton
- Self - Democrat Politician
- (filmato d'archivio)
James Comey
- Self - Former FBI Director
- (filmato d'archivio)
Dianne Feinstein
- Self - Democrat Senator
- (filmato d'archivio)
Kamala Harris
- Self - U.S. Vice President
- (filmato d'archivio)
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
- Self - U.S. Political Candidate
- (filmato d'archivio)
Recensioni in evidenza
This should be required watch for every voting age American citizen. Learn about the man and grandfather, how he sacrifices his wealth and freedom to help us citizens and the country. Learn how Democrats and their media demonize him. Learn how Democrats weaponized and corrupted the justice system to attack him, silence him, bankrupt him, and try to put him in prison. Learn undercover how the Democrats cheat to steal elections, how they buy and manufacture fraudulent and illegal mailed and drop box ballots, and ruin the integrity of our election system. Learn about Kamala Harris policies that would destroy our economy and our country.
10gcic
Of course you have the those trying to drive the ratings down on this movie because of TDS and that just adds to the commentary of what this movie is all about. This movie gives a clear picture of how much President Trump really cares about this country try and how many powerful resources are constantly coming at him. This is a movie about a man who just wants to have an America our founding fathers worked for. Of course people haven't heard of this movie because the media doesn't want people to get a real look at the type of person he is and how much he really cares for our country. A must see.
As a former "Never Trumper" who is going to vote for Trump in 2024, I highly recommend seeing this movie. The most shocking part of it was the part about what is legal and possible in terms of fake ballots. Really shocking James O'Keefe-like footage showing what is possible in terms of cheating. This is so alarming. Without proper elections there is no hope for the world. Venezuela here we come. I am so sorry I misjudged Trump in the past. And I honestly do think that the West will fall unless we elect Trump and other republicans, aided by Democrats including Bobby, Tulsi, the Weinsteins and so many other good people who reject the insane leftist agenda of changing the rules of the game to create a one-party state (weaponising the Justice system, rigging the vote, riding roughshod over our constitutional rights like free speech and the second amendment), etc. I want a president who respects the constitution, rather than a tyrannical Maoist bent on destroying America. This film by Dinesh was excellent.
We really enjoyed this film as we do all of the D'Souza documentaries. He brings receipts. What made my jaw drop was just how insecure and easy to manipulate ballots. Was not ready to see how wide is the breach in the voting integrity wall. It's as wide open are our borders. We were riveted.
I see the rating feature here has been hijacked to drive ratings out the bottom, but the actual user reviews are very very good and insightful. D'Souza never fails to deliver, to support his claims with facts to be seen with the eye.
It's time to go back and see again his first documentary "America: What would the world do Without Her" to remember just why we fight so hard to keep her safe.
I see the rating feature here has been hijacked to drive ratings out the bottom, but the actual user reviews are very very good and insightful. D'Souza never fails to deliver, to support his claims with facts to be seen with the eye.
It's time to go back and see again his first documentary "America: What would the world do Without Her" to remember just why we fight so hard to keep her safe.
This review is actually to point out the after election spin of a review written on oct the 6th. Just about one month before we knew which was the wind really blew.
Now the best part is carefully reading the dated narratives and assertions about authority and quality of the individuals judgment or negative things like lying.
Of course its rated a not at all unreasonable 1 out of 10.
Heck if you want an idea of how much total bs is in the ratings read about weighted ratings methods and then look at any trump content and see the vast numbers of people so dumb they still almost exclusively vote 1 or 10 thinking thats the most effective way to toss partisan skewing in under the radar.
Even the one 5 of 10 review that tries to paint itself as a review of reason. Still the deep bias is there plain to see.
Most people won't like it. That along with plenty other tale tell signs as it progresses give way to the reality this is someone with fairly strong left anti trump bias role playing some sort of reasoned moderate.
Much of the focus is to invalidate as "the proof or evidence" simply isn't there. Im sorry are there an excess of political content like this where the undeniable cited evidence and proof is always present? Like what things has he been watching and what standard does they think exists in such media?
At any rate they almost have a point until their true and clearly purposefully masked bias comes creeping to the surface comforted that they are approaching their goal and its safe to reduce the effort before reaching it.
Most of the political figures and presidents who have been assassinated or attempted tended to be actually at risk of accomplishing something.
Its interesting to think about such things like the list of popular victims or survivors of assassins. How much promise they held for the future or threat to some.
Also its important to note the kind of times general attitudes of the people and parties when no assassinations are occurring or failed attempts.
You can't kill the truth but you can bury it alive.
Now wonder about the sheer volume of noise and distraction and how quickly it has changed in nature and tone post win.
Is that really because people or scared of revenge or some totalitarian regime coming for them in the future? Or is that simply a bunch of kids realizing the jig is up and mom has called them home for dinner.
Now the best part is carefully reading the dated narratives and assertions about authority and quality of the individuals judgment or negative things like lying.
Of course its rated a not at all unreasonable 1 out of 10.
Heck if you want an idea of how much total bs is in the ratings read about weighted ratings methods and then look at any trump content and see the vast numbers of people so dumb they still almost exclusively vote 1 or 10 thinking thats the most effective way to toss partisan skewing in under the radar.
Even the one 5 of 10 review that tries to paint itself as a review of reason. Still the deep bias is there plain to see.
Most people won't like it. That along with plenty other tale tell signs as it progresses give way to the reality this is someone with fairly strong left anti trump bias role playing some sort of reasoned moderate.
Much of the focus is to invalidate as "the proof or evidence" simply isn't there. Im sorry are there an excess of political content like this where the undeniable cited evidence and proof is always present? Like what things has he been watching and what standard does they think exists in such media?
At any rate they almost have a point until their true and clearly purposefully masked bias comes creeping to the surface comforted that they are approaching their goal and its safe to reduce the effort before reaching it.
Most of the political figures and presidents who have been assassinated or attempted tended to be actually at risk of accomplishing something.
Its interesting to think about such things like the list of popular victims or survivors of assassins. How much promise they held for the future or threat to some.
Also its important to note the kind of times general attitudes of the people and parties when no assassinations are occurring or failed attempts.
You can't kill the truth but you can bury it alive.
Now wonder about the sheer volume of noise and distraction and how quickly it has changed in nature and tone post win.
Is that really because people or scared of revenge or some totalitarian regime coming for them in the future? Or is that simply a bunch of kids realizing the jig is up and mom has called them home for dinner.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniFeatured in I Watched Three Terrible Conservative Documentaries (2025)
- Colonne sonoreUnstoppable
Written by Bryan E. Miller
Courtesy of Sensory Overload Music
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- We the Jury
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.372.091 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 774.874 USD
- 29 set 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 1.372.091 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 36min(96 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti