The Real Murders on Elm Street

Youtubers makes better Documentary Than this. It's Just A Podcast With Stupid Visual That are nothing to with Actual Crime scene. I bought Yearly Subscription Of discovery Plus thinking That might see some Good crime Documentary but most of them are just podcast Or voice over Very Disappointed Although Animal Releted Shows are nice.

This is a Podcast.....

For visuals... they throw in a collection of stock footage pieces and photos, or perhaps 10-30 seconds of any court or police related video (if they have it)... If they do actually bother to shoot any scenes, it's clear these scenes are intentionally as generic as possible, in the hopes they can reuse the footage again later.

And then they weave all the above in between repeated shots of talking heads.

Truth is one doesn't need to LOOK at any screen at all, you can simply listen..... it's a Podcast.

The problem with many of these new "true crime" series is that cops are cops.. they aren't radio presenters or announcers. They don't do a good, much less decent, job at using vocal inflections to maintain any interest.

It all starts droning on and on in rather monotonous tones - but again, cops are cops. I don't expect them to be any better with vocal talent than the would be at professional sports. Some may be more adept than others, but none are at a level worthy of a professional production.

The story may be interesting, but the harsh reality is.. READING it may be more entertaining than these Podcast-esque television productions.

As an avid true crime viewer, it's rare to find a new show that's worth watching, but this one is an exception. It's well presented, doesn't suffer from overly-cheesy "re-enactments', and it profiles some interesting cases.

The Elm Street connections are of minimal interest, but also not a big deal. So far, it's avoided excessive recaps and time wasting, "coming up..." teasers-- that alone makes it rare within the genre.

As true crime shows go, this one's a solid 8. It's not exactly Dateline, but it's nowhere near as cringeworthy as those "I Married A Murderer" type shows with the painful narration.

I hope this one lasts a while, assuming the current quality is maintained.

Overall, I have enjoyed this show so far. I was disappointed in the fourth episode because of the violent depictions of the murder. These were not included in the other episodes, especially at that level. I think it was extremely insensitive considering not all the victim's family members were comfortable being interviewed for the show. I am comfortable watching more gory or violent movies or shows, however when telling real people's stories it is important to remember the victims still have friends and family members who may watch the episode to see how the victim was depicted. And if I had known the victim in this episode, that would have been traumatizing and triggering to watch.

The Real Murders on Elm Street is fundamentaly a good idea for a crime series, as there are many Elm Streets around the US, and have been perhaps surprisingly many particularly dire murder cases in these streets, which naturally fits a reality follow up of the.1984 horror classic Nightmare on Elm Street. Without going over the top or making annoying exaggerations the creators manage to get this documentary rather scary cinematographically, with dark mode dramatizations, and some effects and classical edge of or jumping in the seat means of action. Together with a well composed music score this works effectively, at least in the first episode, which stands out among the four produced so far. If the creators can find back to more of this in episode five and six, the total might come up to 8/10 in my view.