Towards Zero
- Mini serie TV
- 2025
Il sovrintendente Battle e l'ispettore Leach indagano sull'uccisione di una vedova a Gull's Point. Un suicidio fallito, una falsa accusa di furto e la vita sentimentale di una star del tenni... Leggi tuttoIl sovrintendente Battle e l'ispettore Leach indagano sull'uccisione di una vedova a Gull's Point. Un suicidio fallito, una falsa accusa di furto e la vita sentimentale di una star del tennis sono collegate a un complotto per omicidio.Il sovrintendente Battle e l'ispettore Leach indagano sull'uccisione di una vedova a Gull's Point. Un suicidio fallito, una falsa accusa di furto e la vita sentimentale di una star del tennis sono collegate a un complotto per omicidio.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Towards Zero' is criticized for its slow pace, unnecessary plot changes, and lack of suspense. Disappointment arises from deviations from Agatha Christie's novel, which detract from the story. Performances are uneven, often lacking tension and menace. The overly dark visual style is frequently faulted for hindering immersion and clarity. Despite these issues, some appreciate the visual aesthetics and certain performances, though these positives are overshadowed by the overall negative reception.
Recensioni in evidenza
The good thing about this was it was just 3 episodes long and, being bbc who don't spend big bucks on the same old actors allowed me to watch the show rather than thinking "What have I seen them in before?"
For me the story was too slow at times with a lot of filler (an hour is an hour on bbc unlike other channels that only need 45 minutes) but it was still engaging.
Waiting a long time for the first murder wasn't helpful but that was the whole point of the story we are told.
I was losing interest until Audrey and Neville became intimate on the stairwell in episode 2.
A strange ending it has to be said after twists, turns and double buffs.
I can see why this hasn't been given the same publicity as on social media that other re went dramas have received.
Watchable but you won't miss anything if you don't.
The ABC Murders was much better.
Waiting a long time for the first murder wasn't helpful but that was the whole point of the story we are told.
I was losing interest until Audrey and Neville became intimate on the stairwell in episode 2.
A strange ending it has to be said after twists, turns and double buffs.
I can see why this hasn't been given the same publicity as on social media that other re went dramas have received.
Watchable but you won't miss anything if you don't.
The ABC Murders was much better.
The visual aesthetic of the series is a major letdown. The overly dark and blueish tint gives it a dated, early-2010s look that feels more like a tired crime drama than a timeless Agatha Christie mystery. The muted color palette and lack of visual creativity make the entire production feel bland and uninspired.
The pacing is another significant issue. The combination of an overtly slow and melodramatic score and hollow conversations drag the story unnecessarily. The result is a miniseries that feels much longer than it actually is.
Finally, the characters, while seemingly layered, quickly become tiresome. Each one is burdened with a troubled past or some nuanced background, but these elements feel overused and repetitive, and lacking authenticity. Instead of adding depth, the constant focus on their personal struggles makes the characters feel like clichés. By the time the mystery reaches its conclusion, it's hard to care about who did what or why.
For me this miniseries is a waste of three hours that I want back.
The pacing is another significant issue. The combination of an overtly slow and melodramatic score and hollow conversations drag the story unnecessarily. The result is a miniseries that feels much longer than it actually is.
Finally, the characters, while seemingly layered, quickly become tiresome. Each one is burdened with a troubled past or some nuanced background, but these elements feel overused and repetitive, and lacking authenticity. Instead of adding depth, the constant focus on their personal struggles makes the characters feel like clichés. By the time the mystery reaches its conclusion, it's hard to care about who did what or why.
For me this miniseries is a waste of three hours that I want back.
The second instalment sees the situations at Gull's point escalate. After a danced through afternoon at the nearby pleasure hotel with multiple partner exchanges and another troublesome newcomer in the form of a former boyfriend, Lady Tressilian is most displeased with her house guests and threatens to change her will. The love triangle at the centre concludes in two people having intimate relations in the stairwell of the house in view of everyone else, a scene that I guess was supposed to be erotic, but ended up more awkward than enticing. Soon after we (finally) get our first murder. Inspector Leach, who has survived his suicide attempt and strikes up an unlikely friendship with Sylvia, investigates the death and soon finds that things might not be as easy as they seem at first glance.
It all continues to be very pretty and glamorous, but by now the changes from the book become glaringly obvious and not all are good ones. The addition of a couple characters are fine, but the original characters suffer a little. Audrey in particular appears little more than a pretty distraction here. It's unclear why Neville seems unable to stay away from her to the point that he betrays his wife right in front of her nose - or why Audrey seems to have her heart set on prying him away from Kay after insisting on the divorce. Both of their motives for this love triangle have been done away with, leaving the central relationships a little flat in result.
It all continues to be very pretty and glamorous, but by now the changes from the book become glaringly obvious and not all are good ones. The addition of a couple characters are fine, but the original characters suffer a little. Audrey in particular appears little more than a pretty distraction here. It's unclear why Neville seems unable to stay away from her to the point that he betrays his wife right in front of her nose - or why Audrey seems to have her heart set on prying him away from Kay after insisting on the divorce. Both of their motives for this love triangle have been done away with, leaving the central relationships a little flat in result.
First the good news: wardrobe and locations are exquisite. The actors are very good, especially Anjelica Huston as the matriarch of a despicable family. Now for the bad stuff: why oh why add absolutely unnecessary characters into one of the finest plots Agatha Christie ever wrote. The dialogues are stilted and absolutely boring. The language, contrary to the setting, is much too modern and sometimes very crude. For the life of me, I don't understand the importance of a cunnilingus scene on the stairs. It just makes no sense. And last, but not least: it's way too long. The whole story could've been told in 90 minutes, it's much too thin for three hours.
Why do the writers always take a perfectly crafted plot from the queen of suspense and trample it to death?
Why do the writers always take a perfectly crafted plot from the queen of suspense and trample it to death?
I love a good Agatha Christie mystery. Years ago when young I reread the books over and over. I was excited about this adaptation, willing to give it a try because I like Angelica Huston and Mathew Rhys. Unfortunately this version had to muck with a really good Agatha Christie "who-dun-it" mystery. This version has changed characters, omitted some characters, overcomplicated their motivations for murder and switched who got murdered first, changing the plot line which dulls the mystery. Even the detective is swapped from Inspector Battle to Leach which is ironic because the name switch symbolises how the story has been dulled down from dramatic to boring. Leach is drowning in alcoholism and is suicidal which makes him overly dark and not compelling to watch. Angelica Huston is too passive, not dominating or caustic enough to murder, only rich. It's dark, not the plot, but rather the filtering chosen for filming is dark & grimy in a weak ploy to create mystery. It's simply annoying as the character's faces are difficult to see in the dark. Dialogue & plot should create the mystery rather than cinematic filters. Sex scenes are used also to create drama which is another by-product of a weak plot line. Christie employed flirtatious characters, but true to her era didn't use overt sex to tell a story, instead Christie always produced a good plot line with witty dialogue. Worst of all, the story is very slow. Christie skilfully wrote Towards Zero with a delayed murder, but this version can't pull that off and when they change the order of the murder plot lines, it jumbles the mystery right out of the story. The few positives are that the setting & costumes are period-rich with details that make the show nice to view.. But even this is dulled by the overused dark filters chosen for this version. Unfortunately setting & costumes can't trump the importance of plot & dialogue for drama. With weak story telling, this version isn't worthy of Dame Agatha Christie. Her descendants promote this film, as it's a money-making legacy for the corporation Christie has become, but I think Agatha the writer would be disappointed.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBurgh Island, South Devon is one of the filming locations. The island is associated with writer Agatha Christie, who often visited and used the location as inspiration for at least two novels: And Then There Were None (1939) and Evil Under the Sun (1941). Previous Christie stories filmed there include: Nemesi (1987) and Evil Under the Sun (2001).
- BlooperMatthew Rhys' detective is shown smoking filter cigarettes which did not become commonplace until the late 1950s, but this is set in the 1930s.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Година нуль
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Burgh Island, Bigbury-on-Sea, Devon, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(Exterior of Easterhead Bay Hotel; pool area as hotel in Nice.)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Towards Zero (2025) officially released in Canada in French?
Rispondi