VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
1705
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
In un futuro opprimente, in cui l'unico contatto di tutti è il proprio computer, un giovane solitario è costretto ad avventurarsi alla ricerca del contatto umano.In un futuro opprimente, in cui l'unico contatto di tutti è il proprio computer, un giovane solitario è costretto ad avventurarsi alla ricerca del contatto umano.In un futuro opprimente, in cui l'unico contatto di tutti è il proprio computer, un giovane solitario è costretto ad avventurarsi alla ricerca del contatto umano.
Recensioni in evidenza
Just read the reviews for DARWIN (2016).... Money grab re-issue of the exact same film.
The original was meh. This renamed title is obviously still meh.
Disappointed to see the great Molly Parker here.
The original was meh. This renamed title is obviously still meh.
Disappointed to see the great Molly Parker here.
It might be hard to get a fix on the real reviews of this movie since there are so many versions out there.
But for the one named 2149: The Aftermath, it's not an exciting movie and it does leave a lot of things unanswered but it is an OK movie.
I can see that some might draw parallels to what is happening now with Covid. Stay inside, let the government take care of you, and other things.
Beef up the response to Covid and it might come close to something like this. The people in the pods would be the pro vaccine/mask people and the people outside would be the no vaccine and mask people.
But for the one named 2149: The Aftermath, it's not an exciting movie and it does leave a lot of things unanswered but it is an OK movie.
I can see that some might draw parallels to what is happening now with Covid. Stay inside, let the government take care of you, and other things.
Beef up the response to Covid and it might come close to something like this. The people in the pods would be the pro vaccine/mask people and the people outside would be the no vaccine and mask people.
This is one of those insufferable cases where a great idea was executed clumsily, and it seems to be largely due to the format at hand. Other reviewers point out the obvious that this is a story that ultimately could not fit the scope it is intended to (a feature length film). It would make for a great singular TV episode type thing, or a short novel.
Ultimately as a 90 minute movie, it is too light on content and storytelling to maintain itself. It is quite literally the kind of film where you could fade in and out of and not lose step with it as long as you are paying attention to the first and last 15 minutes or so.
It's all very interesting and neat, but that's it.
Ultimately as a 90 minute movie, it is too light on content and storytelling to maintain itself. It is quite literally the kind of film where you could fade in and out of and not lose step with it as long as you are paying attention to the first and last 15 minutes or so.
It's all very interesting and neat, but that's it.
As stated in other review this is a reissue / rename of a 2016 movie however I had not seen it before. I quite enjoyed it for what it was, a movie with minimal cast with no expensive backdrops etc. It's almost a snapshot of a part of the whole story and yet it held my interest. If you like end of the world SF then I think you will like this, it's not going to get any awards or make big bucks but kept my interest.
On IMDb this is called Darwin and also Confinement but on Amazon it's known as 2149:The Aftermath. I've watched a lot of movies but never seen 3 completely separate movie titles before. I haven't even watched it yet but when you can't get past the title without a mess you know it's gonna be trouble.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilmed in the summer of 2014, this movie has had 4 different titles. It started as "ESC," then became "Darwin," then became "Confinement," and the latest is "2149: The Aftermath"
- Blooper[Incorrectly regarded as goofs)
Contrary to another goof listed - it should be noted that an entire scene is spent introducing the main character to the concept of personal hygiene. Due to the appearance of a rudimentary shower, bar of soap and the family all having decently neat haircuts and clothing free from grime and dirt, it is therefore not unreasonable to assume that these characters would want to maintain personal grooming routines for some semblance of normalcy, in spite of the post-apocalyptic setting.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 5.000.000 CA$ (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 34 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti