Uno studente di matematica post-laurea scopre che si sta cercando di distruggere il suo lavoro di ricerca di uno schema di numeri primi che gli permetterebbe di accedere a tutti i computer d... Leggi tuttoUno studente di matematica post-laurea scopre che si sta cercando di distruggere il suo lavoro di ricerca di uno schema di numeri primi che gli permetterebbe di accedere a tutti i computer del mondo.Uno studente di matematica post-laurea scopre che si sta cercando di distruggere il suo lavoro di ricerca di uno schema di numeri primi che gli permetterebbe di accedere a tutti i computer del mondo.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Prime Target' presents a fascinating yet uneven mix of mathematical themes and global intrigue. Praised for its innovative premise and strong performances, it delves into human obsession, technology, and morality. However, some find the pacing slow and the plot unrealistic, with inconsistent writing. Acting reviews are mixed, and its complex themes may alienate some viewers. Overall, it’s an ambitious series with a divided reception.
Recensioni in evidenza
The basic idea is great: the notion that a gov't might kill to keep a possible math shortcut, that would instantly render useless modern cryptography, from being discovered isn't totally ridiculous.
Though I'm sufficiently interested to finish the series, what sank this for me, as already mentioned by others, are things such as the "check-list" attributes assigned to characters and thus the selected actors. Consequently, I found the casting was hit and miss. That may have also been a result of the direction. E.g. In episode 5, particularly, one veteran actor may well have been given direction to "imagine Matthew Goode in the role and act like him".
And the script wasn't great.
6/10 means interesting enough to watch it through but prioritize other, much better, viewing options.
Though I'm sufficiently interested to finish the series, what sank this for me, as already mentioned by others, are things such as the "check-list" attributes assigned to characters and thus the selected actors. Consequently, I found the casting was hit and miss. That may have also been a result of the direction. E.g. In episode 5, particularly, one veteran actor may well have been given direction to "imagine Matthew Goode in the role and act like him".
And the script wasn't great.
6/10 means interesting enough to watch it through but prioritize other, much better, viewing options.
Just 3 episodes in the viewer senses that the number of people out to murder the protagonists is uncountable. Starting with a belief that a unique prime number generator exists the argument postulates prime numbers used in cryptography are not random. If that is true then the financial foundation of the economy would be on shaky ground. Even without a degree in math that is hard to swallow. Everyone knows there is always a bigger number than any number you can think of. Just add 1. In a nutshell the movie is about 2 very pretty people evading the hoard after them while knowing the danger will never end.
Somewhat slow, everything is explained to the viewer at every stage so carry on with playboy or as background, you won't miss anything that won't be explained later. For example if the character uses an Apple computer then they're on the good side. If they don't, then..., we'll you get the point. It's an Apple+ (not sure what the+bestowes) production therefore anyone on planet earth who does not use products is defacto bad or misled. So much of this shallow drama is superficial and misleading it beggers belief. Time for a reality check, especially if you have to pay for this simplistic drivel. It gets 5* from me because the subscription is free!
So called smart people, one user wrote, and that's a typical defense mechanism used anytime someone encounters someone smarter than they are. It's very hard to live in a world of feeling uncomfortable which is why most of us either avoid learning more or prefer to live in ignorance. Also, never acknowledging doing either and pretending they're doing the opposite.
This is a bold series. I am impressed at what has been presented so far. Eager for more and frustrated only two episodes are available now.
I think it's hard for people to accept things they don't understand, so I hope this show keeps people like me engaged. Leo Woodall has impressed me in White Lotus and Me Before You, so I'll be here to see how it all plays out.
Thankfully, it's not a blow em up or fight em up show, as I prefer thinking type drama shows. Things that make you think. For anyone out there that thinks they already know, they don't at all.
Here's to keeping an open mind, cheers!
This is a bold series. I am impressed at what has been presented so far. Eager for more and frustrated only two episodes are available now.
I think it's hard for people to accept things they don't understand, so I hope this show keeps people like me engaged. Leo Woodall has impressed me in White Lotus and Me Before You, so I'll be here to see how it all plays out.
Thankfully, it's not a blow em up or fight em up show, as I prefer thinking type drama shows. Things that make you think. For anyone out there that thinks they already know, they don't at all.
Here's to keeping an open mind, cheers!
It started off strong, then went downhill. Poor acting from some, lack of emotional connection, and no interesting relationships. Could have been good, the story line was cool but lacked execution. Not up to Apple TV standards. Previously would feel comfortable watching anything on Apple TV knowing it would be good, but this show just ruined that standard for me.
Edward was played well and he did his job well, but the rest of them were terrible. The female character from NSA was so bad, felt like I couldn't watch her. Felt like the directors were throwing everything into the mix with them going to Baghdad, France and the UK. Seemed a bit all over the place.
Edward was played well and he did his job well, but the rest of them were terrible. The female character from NSA was so bad, felt like I couldn't watch her. Felt like the directors were throwing everything into the mix with them going to Baghdad, France and the UK. Seemed a bit all over the place.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizEdward Brooks is shown to be left-handed. A study by C.P. Benbow in 1986 found the frequency of left-handedness among exceptionally gifted mathematics students was significantly higher than in the general population.
- BlooperTutte le opzioni contengono spoiler
- ConnessioniReferenced in kuji: Artur Chaparyan: Jokes are Not Needed (2025)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Varsity
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti