VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
12.699
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un ex allenatore di pallacanestro di un liceo sfortunato fa di tutto per vincere, il che in questo caso significa guidare la sua squadra di uomini a indossare parrucche e a dominare brutalme... Leggi tuttoUn ex allenatore di pallacanestro di un liceo sfortunato fa di tutto per vincere, il che in questo caso significa guidare la sua squadra di uomini a indossare parrucche e a dominare brutalmente in diversi sport femminili.Un ex allenatore di pallacanestro di un liceo sfortunato fa di tutto per vincere, il che in questo caso significa guidare la sua squadra di uomini a indossare parrucche e a dominare brutalmente in diversi sport femminili.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Michael J. Knowles
- Drake Diamond
- (as Michael Knowles)
Recensioni in evidenza
I'm a DW supporter, and I want them to produce great content. This is only OK.
Run hide fight was good, not great.
Terror on the prairie was ok, Shut in was rough What is a woman was great doc Convicting a murderer was great doc
First of all. 1h52m is way too long for a comedy, unless it is absolutely amazing. Should have been 80 minutes. We found ourselves struggling to get to the end. It's a comedy, get in there, make the jokes, get out on a high point, fill it with a story with a remotely plausible plot.
I like them using DW folks for some of the actors, but Boreing as a lead fell pretty short. Some parts of his acting was fine, most was not. Didn't seem natural. Probably keep him to cameos only going forward.
The plot was weak on the whole. The idea was great, but execution is tough I guess. Comedies are not supposed to be the most cerebral of genres, but if all you're standing on is the jokes, they better bring the heat.
The writing/dialogue was fine for the most part.
Jokes were okay without being excessively mean spirited.
They are a new studio, so I am hopeful they will improve.
Run hide fight was good, not great.
Terror on the prairie was ok, Shut in was rough What is a woman was great doc Convicting a murderer was great doc
First of all. 1h52m is way too long for a comedy, unless it is absolutely amazing. Should have been 80 minutes. We found ourselves struggling to get to the end. It's a comedy, get in there, make the jokes, get out on a high point, fill it with a story with a remotely plausible plot.
I like them using DW folks for some of the actors, but Boreing as a lead fell pretty short. Some parts of his acting was fine, most was not. Didn't seem natural. Probably keep him to cameos only going forward.
The plot was weak on the whole. The idea was great, but execution is tough I guess. Comedies are not supposed to be the most cerebral of genres, but if all you're standing on is the jokes, they better bring the heat.
The writing/dialogue was fine for the most part.
Jokes were okay without being excessively mean spirited.
They are a new studio, so I am hopeful they will improve.
I wanted to like it. I get what they were going for, and it's worthy of praise coming from such a small studio with such a low budget. I hope this isn't the last in this genre from DW.
That said - wow. Not up to par of the classics it was marketed as. Airplane, Dodgeball, Blazing Saddles, Topic Thunder: it's none of those things. I think it could've been with some extra elbow grease and less confirmation bias in the studio.
The criticism that many Christian movies get is that they focus too much on the message and not on the core story and quality of the film. Same issue here. I get they had some quality limitations, but I wish they would've waited to really hone in the story and make sure the lines packed a punch.
Best parts are all the cameos. These are genuinely good and appreciated.
Not sure why we needed the subtle dominatrix thing. Just another example of something that made me cock my head sideways and ask, "Really? Necessary?"
Overall, I know I'll make some people mad for not absolutely loving it, but it is what it is. They want quality content? I'm happy to be the critic for the next future success. I'm aware I'm not the man in the arena, but I don't care.
That said - wow. Not up to par of the classics it was marketed as. Airplane, Dodgeball, Blazing Saddles, Topic Thunder: it's none of those things. I think it could've been with some extra elbow grease and less confirmation bias in the studio.
The criticism that many Christian movies get is that they focus too much on the message and not on the core story and quality of the film. Same issue here. I get they had some quality limitations, but I wish they would've waited to really hone in the story and make sure the lines packed a punch.
Best parts are all the cameos. These are genuinely good and appreciated.
Not sure why we needed the subtle dominatrix thing. Just another example of something that made me cock my head sideways and ask, "Really? Necessary?"
Overall, I know I'll make some people mad for not absolutely loving it, but it is what it is. They want quality content? I'm happy to be the critic for the next future success. I'm aware I'm not the man in the arena, but I don't care.
You pretty much know exactly what you are going to get when you turn on this movie. It delivers exactly what it promises - crass humor pointing out and mocking the absurdity of biological men participating in women's sports. If you agree with the message of the movie, you will likely get some laughs out it. If you don't agree with the message, you will definitely hate it. It is glaringly obvious in its message, but no moreso than what you get from Hollywood on the other side of the fence. While this is certainly not gonna win any writing, acting, or directing awards, it is nice to see an attempt to provide an alternative to the left-leaning material that is currently being served up by Hollywood. Hopefully, enough people watch this movie that The Daily Wire and other conservative outlets will continue to provide an alternative to Hollywood's content and will slowly increase both the quality and quantity of content.
DW promised a goofy, early 2000s comedy with a message and I believe, overall, in landed. I enjoyed it and laughed at the slapstick goofiness and appreciated the meaningful bits. I can see and understand where it fails a little too.
As a stand alone comedy, it's a popcorn movie and doesn't overstay it's welcome with it's pacing, comedy, and plot. The general movie goer (who isn't wildly liberal) would still have a good enough time if one likes movies such as the The Hot Chick, White Chicks, Scary Movie, Wayne's World, and other such on-the-nose, wacky, dumb movies that would have a difficult time being made today. It is true that a DW fan would find the movie more enjoyable due to the cameos - which were extra hysterical if you're "in the know."
If I could only change one thing as someone who loves the idea of this comedy shedding light on an important issue, I would have either removed the ending cameo entirely, or shifted it to after credits.
The general public would also enjoy it even more if they are aware of the western nations' culture war; if the viewer is unaware, the hopeful goal of the movie would be to make people aware of conservative concerns.
That said, the movie does not ride on the backs of DW and conservative cast members; it scratches the old comedy itch millennials have, makes gen x roll their eyes, and can show gen z what comedy used to be.
As a stand alone comedy, it's a popcorn movie and doesn't overstay it's welcome with it's pacing, comedy, and plot. The general movie goer (who isn't wildly liberal) would still have a good enough time if one likes movies such as the The Hot Chick, White Chicks, Scary Movie, Wayne's World, and other such on-the-nose, wacky, dumb movies that would have a difficult time being made today. It is true that a DW fan would find the movie more enjoyable due to the cameos - which were extra hysterical if you're "in the know."
If I could only change one thing as someone who loves the idea of this comedy shedding light on an important issue, I would have either removed the ending cameo entirely, or shifted it to after credits.
The general public would also enjoy it even more if they are aware of the western nations' culture war; if the viewer is unaware, the hopeful goal of the movie would be to make people aware of conservative concerns.
That said, the movie does not ride on the backs of DW and conservative cast members; it scratches the old comedy itch millennials have, makes gen x roll their eyes, and can show gen z what comedy used to be.
Watched this and was entertained, but it's not great movie by any means. I do not think that the Daily Wire has hit the mark with this film. They're always talking about Politics being downstream of Culture and that their hoping to get involved with the culture and change it. This film has too much over politicization to be smartly funny and effect the Culture.
I enjoyed it once and will probably never watch it again. I would not say it was especially funny and I think this movie is really just for conservatives.
Like Matt Walsh's "kids" book I think it overall is a missed opportunity of doing something that could have wider cultural weight.
I enjoyed it once and will probably never watch it again. I would not say it was especially funny and I think this movie is really just for conservatives.
Like Matt Walsh's "kids" book I think it overall is a missed opportunity of doing something that could have wider cultural weight.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis is the first "comedy" made and produced by the Daily Wire.
- BlooperCoach Bob Gibson enters his home at night only to be surprised by the journalist, Billie Rae Brandt, who broke into Bob's home. She is sitting in a chair waiting for him. As they talk, a small sign hangs on the wall next to the front door, behind the coach's head. When the scene transitions away from the front door to the room's interior, the sign disappears.
- Citazioni
Gwen Wilde: I'm a journalist. I literally can't be shamed.
- Colonne sonoreIt Ain't Over
Written by Will Boreing & Lindsay Boreing
Performed by Will Boreing
By arrangement with William Boreing
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Coach Miracle
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Nashville, Tennessee, Stati Uniti(Nashville Municipal Auditorium)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 7.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 52min(112 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti