Fake
- Serie TV
- 2024–
Una scrittrice incontra il rancher Wenham su un'app di appuntamenti. Pensando che sia l'ideale, lei si impegna con lui, solo per scoprire che si è travisato. Scopre le sue bugie.Una scrittrice incontra il rancher Wenham su un'app di appuntamenti. Pensando che sia l'ideale, lei si impegna con lui, solo per scoprire che si è travisato. Scopre le sue bugie.Una scrittrice incontra il rancher Wenham su un'app di appuntamenti. Pensando che sia l'ideale, lei si impegna con lui, solo per scoprire che si è travisato. Scopre le sue bugie.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 7 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Fake is entertaining and definitely had the binge factor to make me keep watching. I wanted to know how it ended and I enjoyed the switch to a different POV and the over all style of storytelling BUT...
1) The main character, Birdie, while really well acted by a talented actress, was just infuriating. Her stupidity and weakness became annoying and I know this is based on a true story, I know it really happened and romance scams happen all the time but I just thought any smart sensible woman would run a mile. Maybe it was because the romance scammer guy was played as a villain from the start. The actor was kind of creepy and so it was hard to believe she would be conned by him.
2) Otherwise first rate production values and performances were marred by the awful dreamlike repetitive sequences where lines were played over and over in voice over as Birdie's thoughts or memories. It felt like budget film school nonsense and really let down the production. It was used as a conceit way too many times.
I wasn't at all keen on the musical choices and why was the Tiger song used twice in different episodes? That felt like they couldn't afford another track. It was insanely annoying as was the Love Kitten track. Just poor musical choices and the sequence where Birdie danced to the latter was cringe.
7/10 is kind but I did binge it and I did enjoy it mostly aside from those few moments of terrible directing choices.
1) The main character, Birdie, while really well acted by a talented actress, was just infuriating. Her stupidity and weakness became annoying and I know this is based on a true story, I know it really happened and romance scams happen all the time but I just thought any smart sensible woman would run a mile. Maybe it was because the romance scammer guy was played as a villain from the start. The actor was kind of creepy and so it was hard to believe she would be conned by him.
2) Otherwise first rate production values and performances were marred by the awful dreamlike repetitive sequences where lines were played over and over in voice over as Birdie's thoughts or memories. It felt like budget film school nonsense and really let down the production. It was used as a conceit way too many times.
I wasn't at all keen on the musical choices and why was the Tiger song used twice in different episodes? That felt like they couldn't afford another track. It was insanely annoying as was the Love Kitten track. Just poor musical choices and the sequence where Birdie danced to the latter was cringe.
7/10 is kind but I did binge it and I did enjoy it mostly aside from those few moments of terrible directing choices.
The key to this working is a credible male lead ( in what is a difficult nuanced role to pull off convincingly). David Wenham didn't, at all. At almost 60 he is for a start too old, too crepey-skinned. His character was creepy, he was given a lizardy persona, unfortunately Joe was NOT what he must be.
Hot.
Who is craving to get in this creaky, rather plodding, aging, man's bed?
Apparently a whole slew of beautiful intelligent women, all taken in and enraptured to the point of slavish devotion . 60 emails with heart rending tales of seducer Joe!!!
Please. No.
None of us watching Joe were craving to be in bed with him either, btw (imagine here a shudder indicating skin crawling at the thought lol).
The writing was off for Joe, the character needed way more finesse in language, charisma, good looks, and sex appeal, delivered by an actor with compelling, utterly irresistible BDE, and way more sympathetic outside of the scene in the church where we see his pain. That was good, well done.
That first encounter at Atons bar ..."do you want to get out of here?" The look that is then exchanged between them as Joe agrees means, as every single adult watching knows, let's ***k. His sliding off into the night outside was the beginning of a mountain of sleight of hand by Joe's character that was absurdly clunky, as to be an insult to the intelligence.
Asher Keddie is terrific, she holds this together. Her character is far better written and presented than her counterpart, we are provided with sufficient context to see why this one woman with her history anxiety and pressures wanted so much for this to work. She was believable in a narrative where nothing else important was believable.
It's an easy reasonably engaging binge, but could have been so much more immersive, tantalising, heartrending.
A missed opportunity, should have been a 10.
Hot.
Who is craving to get in this creaky, rather plodding, aging, man's bed?
Apparently a whole slew of beautiful intelligent women, all taken in and enraptured to the point of slavish devotion . 60 emails with heart rending tales of seducer Joe!!!
Please. No.
None of us watching Joe were craving to be in bed with him either, btw (imagine here a shudder indicating skin crawling at the thought lol).
The writing was off for Joe, the character needed way more finesse in language, charisma, good looks, and sex appeal, delivered by an actor with compelling, utterly irresistible BDE, and way more sympathetic outside of the scene in the church where we see his pain. That was good, well done.
That first encounter at Atons bar ..."do you want to get out of here?" The look that is then exchanged between them as Joe agrees means, as every single adult watching knows, let's ***k. His sliding off into the night outside was the beginning of a mountain of sleight of hand by Joe's character that was absurdly clunky, as to be an insult to the intelligence.
Asher Keddie is terrific, she holds this together. Her character is far better written and presented than her counterpart, we are provided with sufficient context to see why this one woman with her history anxiety and pressures wanted so much for this to work. She was believable in a narrative where nothing else important was believable.
It's an easy reasonably engaging binge, but could have been so much more immersive, tantalising, heartrending.
A missed opportunity, should have been a 10.
This series about a journalist Birdie (Asher Keddie) who dates a compulsive liar and fantasist Joe (David Wenham) has a great premise but its pace is sluggish. And why all the moody focus on Birdie being devastated, anxious and morose as she reels from yet another betrayal from her deadbeat boyfriend? There needs to be more action. Maybe it would have been better to focus on the search to find fellow victims of Joe, and to find out who he really was. In any case, when Birdie does find out something bad about Joe, she tends to be sad, but then keeps going out with him! After five or six no-shows to family birthdays and weddings, and umpteen cancellations of dates, most people would call it quits, but it defies belief that she would put up with this much rejection and lying. If Birdie had fought back a little more, it would have been a better drama. The series is interesting in that it points out that on dates, we cannot predict who the other person might turn out to be. And that Birdie all too readily believes or forgives her lover's bad behaviour because she fears being alone.
Maybe also it would have helped to see a little of the boyfriend's perspective. How he rationalises being so opaque and stuffing Birdie around.
Maybe also it would have helped to see a little of the boyfriend's perspective. How he rationalises being so opaque and stuffing Birdie around.
Birdie is utterly infuriating but I found the story extremely compelling. This is a cautionary tale about how you should trust your instincts. Her gut told her something wasn't right in episode one.
It's very easy to say "oh, I'd never fall for that" or "I'd never tolerate that" when he's repeatedly letting her down, but until you've experienced deceit you never know how you'd react. I certainly wouldn't tolerate things now that I would have when I was younger and much more trusting.
This series has you shouting at the TV and although a little drawn out, I enjoyed it and was eager to see the next episode.
It's very easy to say "oh, I'd never fall for that" or "I'd never tolerate that" when he's repeatedly letting her down, but until you've experienced deceit you never know how you'd react. I certainly wouldn't tolerate things now that I would have when I was younger and much more trusting.
This series has you shouting at the TV and although a little drawn out, I enjoyed it and was eager to see the next episode.
Joe played a slimy creep with a sickening voice, but having come across two of these sort of characters in my time, his role was true to form. A Player of the highest Order. However, Denham really wasn't suited to the role at all. It needed someone less creepy and more 'dashing', thus to avoid the warning bells and red flags that someone like Birdie could be excused for not seeing and acting upon, therefore making it more realistic.
Birdie, Birdie, Birdie - when does stupid become more stupid? You were painful to watch and I wanted to throw my phone away, let alone yours.
All in all, too long and too much of Birdie feeling sorry for herself. I wish I hadn't wasted my time.
Birdie, Birdie, Birdie - when does stupid become more stupid? You were painful to watch and I wanted to throw my phone away, let alone yours.
All in all, too long and too much of Birdie feeling sorry for herself. I wish I hadn't wasted my time.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBased on journalist's Stephanie Wood's "Fake: A Startling True Story"
- ConnessioniFeatured in The 7PM Project: Episodio datato 4 luglio 2024 (2024)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Подделка
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Victoria, Australia(location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti