[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Guida agli episodi
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
IMDbPro

The Jury: Murder Trial

  • Mini serie TV
  • 2024–
  • 3h
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,0/10
250
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
The Jury: Murder Trial (2024)
Reality TV

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaHow much can we trust our justice system? This landmark experiment follows the restaging of a real-life murder trial in front of two juries of ordinary people. Will they reach the same verdi... Leggi tuttoHow much can we trust our justice system? This landmark experiment follows the restaging of a real-life murder trial in front of two juries of ordinary people. Will they reach the same verdict? Shown over 4 Consequtive Days.How much can we trust our justice system? This landmark experiment follows the restaging of a real-life murder trial in front of two juries of ordinary people. Will they reach the same verdict? Shown over 4 Consequtive Days.

  • Creazione
    • Ed Kellie
    • Harry Smyth
    • Will Stanbridge
  • Star
    • Katie Sheridan
    • Jordan Mifsud
    • Caroline Gruber
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    7,0/10
    250
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Creazione
      • Ed Kellie
      • Harry Smyth
      • Will Stanbridge
    • Star
      • Katie Sheridan
      • Jordan Mifsud
      • Caroline Gruber
    • 5Recensioni degli utenti
    • 2Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Ha vinto 1 BAFTA Award
      • 3 vittorie totali

    Episodi4

    Sfoglia gli episodi
    1 stagione

    Foto6

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 2
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali26

    Modifica
    Katie Sheridan
    Katie Sheridan
    • Helen Reisdale
    Jordan Mifsud
    Jordan Mifsud
    • Bradley Ryman
    Caroline Gruber
    Caroline Gruber
    • Kimberley Smythson
    Harry Anton
    Harry Anton
    • P.C James Hilton
    Sam Alexander
    Sam Alexander
    • John Reisdale
    Christopher Simpson
    Christopher Simpson
    • Xavier Ahmad QC
    Ben Dilloway
    Ben Dilloway
    • DS Michael Thorne
    Angus Kennedy
    Angus Kennedy
    • Dr. Walter Caxton
    Ellouise Shakespeare-Hart
    Ellouise Shakespeare-Hart
    • Jo Flixton
    Riz Khan
    Riz Khan
    • Jury Member
    Daphne Kouma
    Daphne Kouma
    • Steffi Leonetti
    Natalie Grady
    • Annaliese Hartt
    Kate Kordel
    Kate Kordel
    • Lucy Harp
    James Allen
    • Judge Eberdale
    David Alexander
    David Alexander
    • Darren Chessington
    Lynette Edwards
    • Joan Romford
    Edward Wolstenholme
    Edward Wolstenholme
    • Mr. Michael Day
    Carrie Bunyan
    Carrie Bunyan
    • Harriet Reisdale
    • Creazione
      • Ed Kellie
      • Harry Smyth
      • Will Stanbridge
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti5

    7,0250
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    3mikeingram-03413

    Could be better

    I appreciate that the intention of this program was to determine whether two independent juries could come up with two different results. However, surely the experiment needed more control procedures to try and reduce (elimination not being possible) the impact of factors that would not be present within the original trial.

    What I felt was that the experiment showed how two groups of differing people could come up with different results based upon interaction that would not be present within the court and trial system.

    The fact that the people chose to go on a TV program, rather than the non optional reality of being put on jury duty, also shows that ego and playing to the camera were very present factors. I appreciate that the real pressure of being on jury duty could not be replicated, but the process and procedures could have been better simulated.

    For me it was an interesting experiment but value degraded to make it a more watchable program.
    6gilleliath

    tell us something we don't know

    Of course, C4 can never just show something trashy for entertainment, so this is therefore an 'experiment' supposedly showing how the dynamics of a jury work. Yet it is in two respects completely unrealistic. First, the juries were obviously not selected randomly but in accordance with 'BBC diversity'. Actually the white blokes included are middle-aged white van men, and the whole thing seems set up as a deliberate microcosm of the culture wars. And second, they may reproduce the words spoken in the real-life trial, but what they can't reproduce (of course) is the general impression made by the witnesses - and, as the jurors' comments make clear, *that is what they mainly go by*. Did the real defendant have such mother-me eyes? Did he burst into tears quite so much? We don't know. Yer man gives it his all, though, I must say that.

    Indeed it is clear that most people made up their minds pretty early on, and did this according to their existing prejudices. Two eps in, we haven't really seen any discussion, as such, at all; those who hold minority views are keeping quiet. Almost nothing that anybody has said - and least of all the barristers who are paid so much to present a case - has actually had any bearing on how it should be judged. Any fictional defence lawyer, Saul Goodman or Kim Wexler say, would rapidly have made mincemeat of the prosecution's feeble efforts. So if the show proves one thing, it is that people don't decide things on reason. But we already knew that...

    Curiously, and in contrast to TV whodunnits, there has been very little focus on the actual MO of the killing. Yet this seems of crucial importance. The guy, having already strangled the woman, and not sure if she is already dead, then finishes her off with a big club hammer that happens to be handy. Why reach for that at all, if the strangling was just 'loss of control'? And okay, he's a sort of blacksmith, but what is the hammer doing on the kitchen table? Nobody in the juries has spotted this anomaly. I suspect him of a pre-meditation that would invalidate the 'loss of control' defence - for whatever that was ever worth.

    ETA: no change in the last ep, in which the juries had to decide their verdicts: every single person went by their general impression of the guy and the case, as seen through the lens of their own previous experiences; not by the specific facts of the killing which were the only things relevant. Added to that, we saw those with minority views in both juries cave in fairly rapidly to the social pressure to agree with the others, in spite of having been apparently adamant in their original opinions. One or two of these seemed to feel they'd been cheated, when they realised there was another jury that had returned the contrary verdict and that therefore their own previous views were defensible. But they had no-one to blame but themselves and their lack of backbone.

    All in all it was pretty depressing, whether considered as illustrating how the jury system works or its wider implications about how beliefs form and spread in society. Interesting, but not exactly fun.
    2catkittenwoman

    Suspicious

    This, to me, seems to be false. Why are they wearing the same clothes for a week or more? They must be uncomfortable at least.

    There is a lack of real diversity in both juries and . They seem to have made their minds up at the beginning.

    The juries forgot that the defendant is an actor and took what he said and displayed emotionally as fact without questioning it. (Yes I know it's dramatised) WHY is there a lump hammer in the kitchen? The jury failed to question this at all. Most artists keep their equipment where they work. Not in the kitchen All in , disappointing. Could do better next time-if there is a next time!

    Altri elementi simili

    The Jury: Death on the Staircase
    7,5
    The Jury: Death on the Staircase
    Breathtaking
    7,6
    Breathtaking
    The British Airways Killer
    6,9
    The British Airways Killer
    24 Hours in Police Custody
    8,4
    24 Hours in Police Custody
    To Catch a Copper
    5,9
    To Catch a Copper
    The Jury
    The Jury
    Il metodo Fenoglio - L'estate fredda
    7,4
    Il metodo Fenoglio - L'estate fredda
    Sarah Everard: The Search for Justice
    7,5
    Sarah Everard: The Search for Justice
    The Jury
    7,6
    The Jury
    Scoop
    6,5
    Scoop
    The Jury
    6,7
    The Jury
    The Fortune Hotel
    7,2
    The Fortune Hotel

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Blooper
      In British courts, barristers do not typically wander around the court during proceedings in the same way as attorneys might do in American courtrooms. The layout and practices in courtrooms can vary between jurisdictions, but there are some general differences between the British and American legal systems.

      In the United Kingdom, barristers (advocates) usually address the court from a designated area, such as the bar table. They may move within this area but do not typically walk around the courtroom during the presentation of cases.

      In this presentation the barrister moved around the court room.

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 26 febbraio 2024 (Regno Unito)
    • Paese di origine
      • Regno Unito
    • Sito ufficiale
      • Screendog
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • East Sussex, Inghilterra(location)
    • Azienda produttrice
      • ScreenDog Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 3h(180 min)
    • Colore
      • Color

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica paginaAggiungi episodio

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.