A Cruel Love: The Ruth Ellis Story

My father a WW2 veteran, he volunteered from Jamaica to serve in the RAF aged 18. After he was demobbed he returned to the UK in 1947. He was here when a great number of the notorious capital cases were tried & gross miscarriages of justice took place. I asked him about Ruth Ellis when an earlier series was made, he said that whilst she did not help herself by appearing more sympathetic, she should not have been hanged. He told me that he was vehemently against capital punishment. I watched the series and I could not fail to be moved by her situation especially knowing the effect that her execution had on her family as it cast a long shadow. Truly shocking & I am glad that capital punishment has been eradicated from the UK justice system.

Ruth Ellis This is story that is both fascinating and heart breaking that I was looking forward to. There is place for a discussion about the need for the ultimate justice to be delivered whilst also not shying away from its mistakes. Or as in the case whether like France there should be a place for a "crime of passion" is crime passionnel. It refers to a violent crime, such as murder, that is committed due to a strong impulse, like anger or jealousy.

But this film sadly is not it. First of all this is just too serious a topic for us to be distracted by "the message", its imposition here is inappropriate. My first impression however is to be frustrated by the poor set design and dialogue. What was the weird railway like carriage that was I think meant to be a café? If anyone wants to know they looked like then watch "Vera Drake" or "The Krays" or "Look Back in Anger". The sets are just jarringly inauthentic.

When she calls someone "pompous" I laughed out loud. Who wrote the dialogue I wondered. Then I saw Kelly Jones wrote the dialogue and she is posh from Oxford. Fair enough. But what about those accents? They sound like Dick Van Dyke, the casting is wrong.

Lastly ALL the men are bad. Horrible, nasty. Come on now this trope is just such a bore.

Famed for being the last woman in Britain to be hanged, Ruth Ellis shot and killed her lover David Blakely after a turbulent and troublesome affair. Ellis was hanged by Albert Pierrepoint.

ITV have done some cracking dramas based on real life events, just think of Des and The Pembroke Murders to name just a few, whilst I'd say this was good, it doesn't perhaps quite match up to those.

It's a little slow to start, but it does get better, the final two episodes were better than the first two.

It's interesting to hear some of the legalities of the case, Ruth's admission and refusal to accept legal advice are intriguing.

Visually it's terrific, the sets and costumes are spot on, I thought the music was rather good, my only issue I guess, the script seemed a little flat at times, it just lacked a bit of sparkle.

Lucy Boynton and Mark Stanley were rather good, I thought Toby Jones was excellent throughout, a role not too dissimilar to the one he played in Witness for the Prosecution from a few years back.

Pretty good, but may I make a suggestion, check out Dance with a Stranger, it's worth hunting down, it starred Miranda Richardson and Rupert Everett.

7/10.

Watched> Wednesday, 26th March, 2025 @ Edge Water Studios. Rated 4.5 * * * * Very Good to Excellent - 8/10 < Cert. Would be a 15 > Four Part Mini Series by ITV. Great acting performance from Lucy Boynton, as Ruth Ellis, followed by very good performances from Toby Jones, as John Bickford, Mark Stanley, as Desmond Cussen and Laurie Davidson, as David Blakely. This is a Notoriously TRUE STORY, that changed British history, because of Ruth Ellis (age 28) who was the last woman in Britain to be sentenced to death, by hanging, on Wednesday, 13th July, 1955 at 9 am. She was WRONGLY CONVICTED, as evidence was with held, which meant she could have received a life sentence, instead of The DEATH Penalty. Badly handled by the authorities at the time, SHAME ON THEM!! This 4-part film can be dark and solemn, with upsetting scenes. Their are lighter moments at times, but mainly this is such a tragic story of a young lady who wanted to live her life to the full, right or wrongly. (ps)

STAR RATING: ***** Brilliant **** Very Good *** Okay ** Poor * Awful

On the 10th April 1955, Ruth Ellis (Lucy Boynton) fatally shot her former lover, racing car driver David Blakely (Laurie Davidson.) She freely admitted her crime, and seemed resigned to her punishment. Her lawyer, John Bickford (Toby Jones) desperately tried to get her to work the system, and evidence emerged of physical and psychological abuse at the hands of Blakely. There was also the involvement of her partner on the side, Desmond Cusson (Mark Stanley), who may have supplied her with the gun, but it all emerged to naught, and she became the last woman to be hanged in the UK on 13th July 1955.

The story of Ruth Ellis has been well documented, but on the seventieth anniversary of her crime and subsequent conviction and execution, ITV have delivered this four part dramatisation of her grim fate. It seems relevant on this anniversary, given how much more is understood about abusive relationships, and how power and control can exert their influence over actions, and as such, Ellis's case spearheaded public movement towards abolishing capital punishment.

Despite the case being well captured in the public domain, a TV drama still had the potential to deliver something worthwhile, but A Cruel Love fails to develop into anything with much depth and substance in regards the story. It unwisely plays in a reverse plotting style, beginning with Ruth's arrest, and then backtracking to her relationship with Blakely and Cusson. It's a shame, as the performances are decent, namely Boynton in the lead role, capturing Ruth's stubbornly determined acceptance of her actions, before the gravity of her fate dawns on her, with strong support from Jones as the lawyer who desperately tries to save her, but understands that the system is determined to crush her for being a free and independent young woman. Stanley is impassioned and intense as the man she loved on the side, while Nigel Havers makes a grimly pertinent appearance as the judge who sentences Ruth to death, given it was his grandfather who actually did the deed.

It plays out as it does, in its disjointed and clunky manner, but the tale still keeps your attention over its four part course, before drawing to its desperately sad conclusion. A story still worth telling, but it doesn't completely hit the mark here. ***