Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaOur history has been fabricated. The official timeline of our recent past, does not match our reality. Our Rockefeller "his-story" books are pure fabrication. There has been a massive cover-... Leggi tuttoOur history has been fabricated. The official timeline of our recent past, does not match our reality. Our Rockefeller "his-story" books are pure fabrication. There has been a massive cover-up.Our history has been fabricated. The official timeline of our recent past, does not match our reality. Our Rockefeller "his-story" books are pure fabrication. There has been a massive cover-up.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Foto
Recensioni in evidenza
Why is this information successfully appearing everywhere all at once? The evidence is clear and there is little margen of error regarding the age of the buildings. The narrative taught in schools is clearly invented and alienating. These buildings were not built in the 19th century and are not from a Greco-Roman civilization since they are present all around the world. This aspect of the documentary is perfect and I wish it ended there, together with the evidence on incubators, orphanates and asylums. But the film expands to other interesting subjects that actually discredit the main one instead of enhancing it. And the hip hop "music" used is the nail on the coffin, making the whole work look like a teenager's joke, too fringe, and so unsharable.
Gather some footage from god knows what sources and question all kinds of facts by suggesting far fetched and unproven idea's. Its good to question things from our past, its not good to question them by suggesting alternative but not well argumented ideas of how our past might have been. An open mind is brain that can argument, with logic and sensible ideas. That was missing in this documentary. Didn't bother to fact check cause no facts were offered. I have questions about how the pyramids were constructed but that doesn't make me think that a some elitists have altered the conception of how it came into place. That's just ridiculous.
This documentary has unveiled the truth about our history. It shows the mastery of building great monuments with horse and buggies. How was that done - it calls into question. Ever notice old buildings say "Founded in 1800" not " Built in 1800" makes you wonder. It is a must see!!!
This documentary has unveiled the truth about our history. It shows the mastery of building great monuments with horse and buggies. How was that done - it calls into question. Ever notice old buildings say "Founded in 1800" not " Built in 1800" makes you wonder. It is a must see!!!
This documentary has unveiled the truth about our history. It shows the mastery of building great monuments with horse and buggies. How was that done - it calls into question. Ever notice old buildings say "Founded in 1800" not " Built in 1800" makes you wonder. It is a must see!!!
This documentary has unveiled the truth about our history. It shows the mastery of building great monuments with horse and buggies. How was that done - it calls into question. Ever notice old buildings say "Founded in 1800" not " Built in 1800" makes you wonder. It is a must see!!!
This documentary has unveiled the truth about our history. It shows the mastery of building great monuments with horse and buggies. How was that done - it calls into question. Ever notice old buildings say "Founded in 1800" not " Built in 1800" makes you wonder. It is a must see!!!
This felt like it was put together by a junior high school student. Just a mish-mash of vaguely put together conspiracy theories with almost no relation or context. The video and audio editing must have been done by someone commissioned on fiverr. Music blaring in and out as people are talking. "Oh yeah, let's plug in Moonlight Sonata at full blast in this part in particular for no reason!" Truly brilliant. These guys think giants built state capitals and blimps were flying yachts in the sky I guess? They go on to both back up their stories and refute themselves nearly in the same sentence with the same explanations. It's impressive to me one of the 'experts' appeared to be outside during his interviews because I doubt anyone else involved in this production has touched grass since 2020. Good thing he was wearing those 3D glasses you get in movie theaters so the fake sun won't hurt his eyes.
"The Old World Order" is a low-budget conspiracy theory "documentary" that promises to uncover hidden truths but ends up being an exercise in confusion and frustration. The film is an odd assortment of theories that leap from one topic to another without ever establishing a clear narrative or point. It lacks coherence, credible sources, and a basic understanding of the subjects it attempts to tackle.
The film features a series of so-called "experts" who oscillate between stating observable, logical facts and launching into wild, unsupported conclusions. For instance, the documentary suggests that the presence of large doors in old European buildings implies that people were once 20-30 feet tall-a claim that defies logic and common sense. Another bizarre assertion is that iconic buildings in Washington D. C. from the 1850s were stolen from an unnamed group and that this history was covered up.
One of the film's most glaring flaws is its failure to clearly articulate its subject matter. It never explains what it's talking about, who is involved, or what the ultimate goal of the discussion is. The narrative is a jumble of disconnected statements, each more outlandish than the last. The lack of direction leaves viewers puzzled and exasperated.
The credibility of the film's experts is also highly questionable. At one point, a janitor is cited as a witness to an underground basement's existence-based on hearsay from another janitor who never actually saw the basement. This kind of flimsy evidence undermines the film's already shaky premise. A quick Google search could easily verify or debunk the film's claims, such as the existence of a basement in a museum.
Theories presented in "The Old World Order" are not just outlandish but also disregard basic scientific principles and historical facts. For example, the film posits that a race of giants once existed and that this truth is being hidden by a shadowy group. It also claims that stone buildings cannot burn down, ignoring well-documented events like the Notre Dame fire. The film even touches on the idea of suppressed "unlimited free energy" from a non-existent "ether," showing a lack of understanding of modern science.
Overall, "The Old World Order" fails on every front. It is neither informative nor entertaining. The documentary's lack of coherent argument, credible sources, and basic logical reasoning makes it a frustrating watch. For those interested in conspiracy theories, the film "Conspiracy Theory" starring Mel Gibson offers a much more engaging and coherent narrative. In contrast, "The Old World Order" is a poorly executed and pointless endeavor that doesn't even manage to be amusing in its absurdity. It's best avoided unless you're looking for a lesson in how not to make a documentary.
The film features a series of so-called "experts" who oscillate between stating observable, logical facts and launching into wild, unsupported conclusions. For instance, the documentary suggests that the presence of large doors in old European buildings implies that people were once 20-30 feet tall-a claim that defies logic and common sense. Another bizarre assertion is that iconic buildings in Washington D. C. from the 1850s were stolen from an unnamed group and that this history was covered up.
One of the film's most glaring flaws is its failure to clearly articulate its subject matter. It never explains what it's talking about, who is involved, or what the ultimate goal of the discussion is. The narrative is a jumble of disconnected statements, each more outlandish than the last. The lack of direction leaves viewers puzzled and exasperated.
The credibility of the film's experts is also highly questionable. At one point, a janitor is cited as a witness to an underground basement's existence-based on hearsay from another janitor who never actually saw the basement. This kind of flimsy evidence undermines the film's already shaky premise. A quick Google search could easily verify or debunk the film's claims, such as the existence of a basement in a museum.
Theories presented in "The Old World Order" are not just outlandish but also disregard basic scientific principles and historical facts. For example, the film posits that a race of giants once existed and that this truth is being hidden by a shadowy group. It also claims that stone buildings cannot burn down, ignoring well-documented events like the Notre Dame fire. The film even touches on the idea of suppressed "unlimited free energy" from a non-existent "ether," showing a lack of understanding of modern science.
Overall, "The Old World Order" fails on every front. It is neither informative nor entertaining. The documentary's lack of coherent argument, credible sources, and basic logical reasoning makes it a frustrating watch. For those interested in conspiracy theories, the film "Conspiracy Theory" starring Mel Gibson offers a much more engaging and coherent narrative. In contrast, "The Old World Order" is a poorly executed and pointless endeavor that doesn't even manage to be amusing in its absurdity. It's best avoided unless you're looking for a lesson in how not to make a documentary.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 45.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 30 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Old World Order (2024) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi