Seguite questo remake de La banda dei cinque del 1978.Seguite questo remake de La banda dei cinque del 1978.Seguite questo remake de La banda dei cinque del 1978.
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Absolute nonsense.
The only thing that told me this was the famous five was the name of the characters. It was more in the style of a badly written Indiana Jones.
Creepy techno music, poor dialogue, atrocious acting.
Not appropriate for young children, which was a shame as we sat down as a family expecting to enjoy the classic story we all enjoy. I was expecting some adaptation but this was silly and not age appropriate. My children read and love the books. Instead it was a nonsense full of unnecessarily creepy moments bordering on mild horror at points.
I would avoid if you enjoy any part of Enid blyton. Or just like stories to make sense. You won't get that here. Even the kids said it was rubbish.
The only thing that told me this was the famous five was the name of the characters. It was more in the style of a badly written Indiana Jones.
Creepy techno music, poor dialogue, atrocious acting.
Not appropriate for young children, which was a shame as we sat down as a family expecting to enjoy the classic story we all enjoy. I was expecting some adaptation but this was silly and not age appropriate. My children read and love the books. Instead it was a nonsense full of unnecessarily creepy moments bordering on mild horror at points.
I would avoid if you enjoy any part of Enid blyton. Or just like stories to make sense. You won't get that here. Even the kids said it was rubbish.
Awful. Just awful. Adaptation or not it's not in keeping with the classic story telling and adventure of the Famous Five.
Enid Blyton would be so disappointed. All that time these books have been loved by so many.
And to not film it in Dorset is a complete snub of the love Enid had for the Purbecks.
Awful. Awful. Just awful. Awful. Just awful. Awful. Just awful. Clearly having a controversial director has done absolutely nothing for the storyline.
The only decent acting was from Timmy the dog!
The acting was dreadful especially Jack Gleeson
Terrible. Disappointing. Waste of time. Don't do it!!! Awful. Awful. Awful.
Enid Blyton would be so disappointed. All that time these books have been loved by so many.
And to not film it in Dorset is a complete snub of the love Enid had for the Purbecks.
Awful. Awful. Just awful. Awful. Just awful. Awful. Just awful. Clearly having a controversial director has done absolutely nothing for the storyline.
The only decent acting was from Timmy the dog!
The acting was dreadful especially Jack Gleeson
Terrible. Disappointing. Waste of time. Don't do it!!! Awful. Awful. Awful.
The first episode wasn't overly bad and had some nice touches and I hoped it would continuetoimprove. Not sure about the stranger things soundtrack but admired the effort to be bold. However episode 2 rather than getting better got worse.... awful even. I Havnt watched the 3rd... It's such a shame but just doesn't capture the source material for me like it should have and drifts far too far away from it on tangents that don't work and end being very naff. Feel sorry for the wasted cast and opportunity to do something long lasting and breathe new life into, granted dated, but great adventure stories. Nice idea... but for this reviewer, it fails.
Another shameless example of trading on a name. This is the Famous Five in name only. If they didn't want to adapt the actual stories then they should have given the characters original names and made the story they obviously wanted to tell.
The original 70s series frequently played fast and loose with the stories due to trying to the need to fit them into 30 or 60 minutes, but even at their worst they still felt like the Famous Five. This monstrosity feels nothing like the Famous Five.
Don't waste your time with this and encourage them to make more. Go watch the 70s version on Britbox or better yet, go read the books (the proper uncensored versions).
The original 70s series frequently played fast and loose with the stories due to trying to the need to fit them into 30 or 60 minutes, but even at their worst they still felt like the Famous Five. This monstrosity feels nothing like the Famous Five.
Don't waste your time with this and encourage them to make more. Go watch the 70s version on Britbox or better yet, go read the books (the proper uncensored versions).
Continuity breaks and plot holes you can sail a wooden boat through, pacing issues, and some really bad dialogue. Yes, I grew up with the books, as did my kids who watched with me. We were all prepared for alterations in story, but so much of it was unnecessary and caused us to spend way to much time with the "big name" actors chewing the scenery and the dialogue, whilst the "famous" five were very often absent. The kids were appalled, and I'm still bewildered at how this could be so bad. And don't get me started on the dialogue-drowning era-jarring electro-soundtrack and epilepsy-inducing titles!
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniRemake of La banda dei cinque (1978)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does The Famous Five have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Enid Blyton's Famous Five
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 30min(90 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti