VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,3/10
3178
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una strada polverosa verso una città della morte. Il tempo passa da una coscienza all'altra in un flusso ipnotico di sogni, desideri e ricordi, un mondo di fantasmi dominato dalla figura di ... Leggi tuttoUna strada polverosa verso una città della morte. Il tempo passa da una coscienza all'altra in un flusso ipnotico di sogni, desideri e ricordi, un mondo di fantasmi dominato dalla figura di Pedro Páramo, amante, signore supremo, assassino.Una strada polverosa verso una città della morte. Il tempo passa da una coscienza all'altra in un flusso ipnotico di sogni, desideri e ricordi, un mondo di fantasmi dominato dalla figura di Pedro Páramo, amante, signore supremo, assassino.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 7 vittorie e 30 candidature totali
Manuel Garcia-Rulfo
- Pedro Páramo
- (as Manuel García-Rulfo)
Tenoch Huerta
- Juan Preciado
- (as Tenoch Huerta Mejía)
Horacio Garcia Rojas
- Donis
- (as Horacio García-Rojas)
Recensioni in evidenza
Juan Rulfo might be one of the most influencial Latin American writters of all time, and Pedro Paramo is without a doubt his masterpiece, so having to adapt it into any kind of work (a film, a tv series, a play) is a risk very few screenwriters, directors and producers can afford.
Four times Academy Award® nominee cinematographer - and now director - Rodrigo Prieto knows very well how to use all his resources and talent to create a flawless visually and technical stunning enviroment worthy of praise with the help of Academy Award® winner Eugenio Caballero in charge of the production design, and Academy Award® winner Gustavo Santaolalla in the music score.
The cast is amazing too, especially the supporting performances by Dolores Heredia, Roberto Sosa and Ilse Salas.
Goya® winner Mateo Gil does an impressive work adapting Rulfo's book, keeping in mind the narrative of the book is not lineal and might be difficult to follow, therefore this is a movie that needs to be watched while paying attention.
Four times Academy Award® nominee cinematographer - and now director - Rodrigo Prieto knows very well how to use all his resources and talent to create a flawless visually and technical stunning enviroment worthy of praise with the help of Academy Award® winner Eugenio Caballero in charge of the production design, and Academy Award® winner Gustavo Santaolalla in the music score.
The cast is amazing too, especially the supporting performances by Dolores Heredia, Roberto Sosa and Ilse Salas.
Goya® winner Mateo Gil does an impressive work adapting Rulfo's book, keeping in mind the narrative of the book is not lineal and might be difficult to follow, therefore this is a movie that needs to be watched while paying attention.
I live in Small city from the north of Mexico and I feel really related to this movie. My grand mother told me a few story's about our ancestries and events that happened time ago on our city. And I can tell you that the people in Mexico it really acted like that. I loved this movie I really recommend to watch!!!. Im going to tell you one of my grandmother story "one time in my city a guy wearing a charro suit was walked around the streets until he find the guy that he was looking for and he just shot him right in the chest and killed him, then he walked away disappearing in the dry river while the police and people were looking for him,but no one never knew who he was or why he kill the guy from my town.
I didn't know this was adapted from a novel until I read some of these reviews, but now that makes sense. There is a depth of pain and sorrow wrought from the passions and injustices of our human condition in every frame of this film, and I am guessing in every page of the novel, which I have not read. Some reviews seem to think it does not do justice to the book, but imo, as a film it is beautifully tragic. And very well filmed and acted. There are probably many cultural elements about the story I missed, like One Hundred Years Of Solitude, but also like that film it's a fabulous and deep work. My only complaint is I lost track of some of the characters, who they were and what time they represented. But it all came into focus later. 8/10.
The difficulty of adapting one of the best Mexican literary works and one of the greatest examples of surrealism was a complete challenge for this great photographer and now debuting director. The film tries and succeeds very well, with an excellent cast and a long history in Mexican cinema, they give it the necessary support to tell this magical, melancholic story that is difficult to understand for those who are not Mexican. It is not the typical Hollywood, there are no monsters, aliens, or other current inclusive themes. This film is a tribute to Mexico, to our history, to our countryside and to our people. I think Mr. Rulfo would be happy with the work done on his great novel.
Having read the book first, I'm a little torn on which I like better.
Some moments in the story hit better on paper. Overall, however, the movie is easier to follow. It's a very faithful adaptation in terms of what happens in the plot. The visuals & transitions between scenes do a great job of helping the viewer understand the cacophony of characters & the constant jumping around between places in the timeline. Simply being able to see which character's face is talking & how old they look makes it easier to fit all the pieces together-even if some vague aspects are left up to interpretation by the end.
They also do a good job of leaning into the horror elements. They don't simplify the plot to reduce it to a jump-scare thriller. It simply has some nice moments of creepy tension. Tenoch Huerta-Mejía performs well in these scenes.
Similarly, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo performs so believably as Pedro Páramo, being somehow sympathetic (you believe he's having the emotions he shows) despite all the horrible shit he does.
In the end, I have to give the slight edge to the movie. It works better.
Some moments in the story hit better on paper. Overall, however, the movie is easier to follow. It's a very faithful adaptation in terms of what happens in the plot. The visuals & transitions between scenes do a great job of helping the viewer understand the cacophony of characters & the constant jumping around between places in the timeline. Simply being able to see which character's face is talking & how old they look makes it easier to fit all the pieces together-even if some vague aspects are left up to interpretation by the end.
They also do a good job of leaning into the horror elements. They don't simplify the plot to reduce it to a jump-scare thriller. It simply has some nice moments of creepy tension. Tenoch Huerta-Mejía performs well in these scenes.
Similarly, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo performs so believably as Pedro Páramo, being somehow sympathetic (you believe he's having the emotions he shows) despite all the horrible shit he does.
In the end, I have to give the slight edge to the movie. It works better.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAnna Terrazas, the costume designer, said in an interview that the use of turquoise and blue was strategically used to represent the love of Pedro Páramo for Susana San Juan. In their very first scene, Susana and Pedro are flying a blue kite and Susana wears a dress in a light shade of turquoise. "I found that color precisely for Susana, because in the book there's a lot of reference to water when talking about Susana", said Terrazas.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Pedro Páramo?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 900.000 MXN (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 10 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti