VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
9975
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un uomo viene lasciato nello spazio a causa di uno sfortunato incidente mentre un altro uomo sulla Terra lotta per riportarlo indietro sano e salvo.Un uomo viene lasciato nello spazio a causa di uno sfortunato incidente mentre un altro uomo sulla Terra lotta per riportarlo indietro sano e salvo.Un uomo viene lasciato nello spazio a causa di uno sfortunato incidente mentre un altro uomo sulla Terra lotta per riportarlo indietro sano e salvo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 7 candidature totali
Iain Batchelor
- Space Craft
- (English version)
- (voce)
Recensioni in evidenza
The story revolves around Korea's second attempt at reaching the moon (in 2029) after a previous failed attempt.
This time, things don't go well either.. and one (incompetent?) man is left stranded and has to survive using the Moon resources until he is rescued. Solar flares, sudden meteor showers and many more can be expected. This is what Jay from RedLetterMedia would probably call "disaster porn".
I expected more of this film due to the quality levels of production and visuals. And seeing SO many 9 and 10 score reviews from accounts that have not reviewed anything else says a lot about it.
Personally, I found it completely devoid of charm, personality and lacking in engagement. Sure, lots of "things" happen and tension is almost always high (as with all space missions), but the slow pacing and dull developments make the 2-hour runtime almost a chore. Barely anyone stands out and there's no one to latch on to. Doesn't help that there's a lot of "Government involvement" that interferes as an extra layer of tedium, and the interpersonal interactions are very generic.
It's okay if you like space movies, but I was really bored the entire time.
This time, things don't go well either.. and one (incompetent?) man is left stranded and has to survive using the Moon resources until he is rescued. Solar flares, sudden meteor showers and many more can be expected. This is what Jay from RedLetterMedia would probably call "disaster porn".
I expected more of this film due to the quality levels of production and visuals. And seeing SO many 9 and 10 score reviews from accounts that have not reviewed anything else says a lot about it.
Personally, I found it completely devoid of charm, personality and lacking in engagement. Sure, lots of "things" happen and tension is almost always high (as with all space missions), but the slow pacing and dull developments make the 2-hour runtime almost a chore. Barely anyone stands out and there's no one to latch on to. Doesn't help that there's a lot of "Government involvement" that interferes as an extra layer of tedium, and the interpersonal interactions are very generic.
It's okay if you like space movies, but I was really bored the entire time.
I want to comment on the character of the main role as an astronaut. I think he is an astronaut who is not very smart and intelligent, and I don't see any professionalism in him in dealing with any incidents that might occur. I saw him as an astronaut who had just been trained yesterday. In my view, an astronaut will be quick to make brilliant decisions when faced with a situation or incident that shows his professionalism, but in this film the astronaut is not alert and actually thinks too late. Yes, even though I know this is a fiction film, not everything that happens in the film should have no logic. Throughout the film, the astronaut is not shown eating or drinking anything while on the moon to maintain his consciousness and health.
As an American and a huge fan of Hollywood action films, it would take a lot for me to rate this a ten. Armageddon(1998) and Apollo 13 (1995), this is not. However, the potential is there but doesn't become realized until the 2nd third of the movie. It becomes more intense. You begin to care about the characters. The final 3rd hammers it home and you're not so concerned about its start anymore. The action, the acting, and the suspense are great. You're on the edge of your seat. You cry. You cheer. Once you finish the movie, however, you become upset about the weak use of dynamic Korean actors like Kim Rae-won, Lee Yi-kyung, and Lee Sung-min. Then you wonder why the beginning was just so so. Budget issues? Perhaps. Even though Do Kyungsoo is the star, making others have a stronger presence would not take away from the star. No one took from Bruce Willis' spotlight, but the entire cast of characters in Armageddon shone brightly because it was so well-written. Finally, the music score needed a little work. Ijs.
First, I'm suspect of those abject stars on here. Both either didn't watch the movie or are bots.
The acting is a little above mediocre. The action manages to keep your attention. The effects are pretty decent. Not much to complain about besides the drama tacked on to stretch a runtime and give more screentime to a Korean idol. That created the occasional cringe moment. It doesn't ruin the plot or story though. Just something American audiences aren't familiar with so they don't understand this mugging they do in Korean AAA movies.
This really needed a big screen viewing to completely grasp the scope of the movie. I felt like I was loosing part of the visuals on television and this movie relies on them.
Overall, an average movie but above average fo Korean Cinema. It's a popcorn fodder sci-fi beast so that doesn't matter that much.
The acting is a little above mediocre. The action manages to keep your attention. The effects are pretty decent. Not much to complain about besides the drama tacked on to stretch a runtime and give more screentime to a Korean idol. That created the occasional cringe moment. It doesn't ruin the plot or story though. Just something American audiences aren't familiar with so they don't understand this mugging they do in Korean AAA movies.
This really needed a big screen viewing to completely grasp the scope of the movie. I felt like I was loosing part of the visuals on television and this movie relies on them.
Overall, an average movie but above average fo Korean Cinema. It's a popcorn fodder sci-fi beast so that doesn't matter that much.
High level special effects, cinematography, sound, editing, art design, all wasted on a very cheesy script. Heart breaking, but it's impossible to have a good movie with such a poor script, no matter how good the other elements are. I won't give more details to avoid spoilers. I cannot even talk much about the acting, since the characters are so much stereotyped. It would be unfair to blame the actors, they did what their roles required, which wasn't much.
Having said that, it has some entretainment value, but better seen in a theater because of the visuals.
I am sure Korean cinema could do better on the writing side, having so many good ones in the last years.
Having said that, it has some entretainment value, but better seen in a theater because of the visuals.
I am sure Korean cinema could do better on the writing side, having so many good ones in the last years.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizKeep watching to the final minutes of the rolling end credits to hear the song "Fly me to the moon" by a Korean singing the English lyrics.
- BlooperWhile it is possible that frozen water could be found inside the moon, ice (frozen water) cannot exist in vacuum. it immediately boils and dissipate when it is brought to the surface without proper casing.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Moon?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 28.000.000.000 KRW (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 92.718 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 41.745 USD
- 20 ago 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 5.207.157 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 9min(129 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.90 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti