Esplorazione del sistema di giustizia penale americano e di casi importanti attraverso rievocazioni basate su trascrizioni giudiziarie effettive.Esplorazione del sistema di giustizia penale americano e di casi importanti attraverso rievocazioni basate su trascrizioni giudiziarie effettive.Esplorazione del sistema di giustizia penale americano e di casi importanti attraverso rievocazioni basate su trascrizioni giudiziarie effettive.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
The first depicted a child being severely beaten. I think trigger warnings are needed. I usually love Judge Judy and the facts of a case are the facts of a case, but thats just not soemething at my age I want to see on television. I have pretty severe PTSD and was not prepared for that. I will check out other episodes and hopefully they will be less graphic. To the children who have experienced such horrible torture at the hands of their parents, I pray for your healing.
Is justice truly just? That's for us to decide. I am shocked at what has happened in our courtrooms. It can be truly devastating to see what the rulings were. I'm glad for this show because I'm learning a lot. Everyone should watch this show. Judge Judy is truly amazing. I hope there'll be more than 1 season.
"Justice on Trial" (S01, 8 eps, 45-min, Prime) Judge Judy Sheindlin writes and stars in this series devoted to trial re-enactments of landmark cases. It's a fine concept but this type of content demands proper attention to its execution. The show's concept turns the design of shows like Dateline and 20/20 around, where 90% of the presentation is the crime backstory with the trial bringing up the end. Here, it's the same sequence but the weighting is reversed. Each episode features Judy as commentator and judge with the same two guys playing prosecutor and defense counsel. On her other shows you get Judy turned up to 10 but here, she's greatly toned down to a 1 or 2 so that's refreshing. The cases and their outcomes are interesting but what I find time after time that irritated me is that so much of the story is left out. For instance, the 2nd and 3rd eps concerned how a 15yo boy was absolutely steamrolled by detectives into giving a false confession yet there was absolutely no discussion of his parents' role in his mentally/emotionally abusive interrogations and polygraph. Narrative oversights like this are inexcusable. Finally, there's no jury in these re-enactments, there's no information as to how long the real jury took to return verdicts, no "where are they now", etc.
I absolutely love this show. I personally love anything true crime and anything produced/directed/created by Ms. Judy. I watch crime shows and although they tell you what happened in court a lot of times they dont show you. So these episodes give me a lot of understanding of what goes on behind the scenes. Can't wait to continue watching.
The new Judith Schiendlin show is a slick and fast paced entertainment, it is also a fascinating look at the American legal system using real life cases to illustrate it. However, this is not the Judge Judy we know and love and she appears here very much a fish out of water. Her inclusion in the show was probably a means to sell the series, or maybe she just likes being on tv. The lawyers involved, Daniel Mentzer and Larry Bakman, are certainly passionate but their melodramatic performances began to irritate me after a while. My verdict, worth a watch.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- El juicio de la justicia
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti