VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
2106
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Edward, funzionario pubblico, fugge dalla fidanzata Molly il giorno del loro matrimonio a Rangoon, nel 1917. Molly, decisa a sposarsi, lo segue attraverso l'Asia.Edward, funzionario pubblico, fugge dalla fidanzata Molly il giorno del loro matrimonio a Rangoon, nel 1917. Molly, decisa a sposarsi, lo segue attraverso l'Asia.Edward, funzionario pubblico, fugge dalla fidanzata Molly il giorno del loro matrimonio a Rangoon, nel 1917. Molly, decisa a sposarsi, lo segue attraverso l'Asia.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 10 vittorie e 22 candidature totali
Rembrandt Beerens
- Príncipe Tailandês
- (as Rembrant Beerens)
Recensioni in evidenza
A poem movie, reflexive about human condition, the human trivia that humans try to make as a huge and it's nothing. We humans make things important when nothing is important than our souls, the comfort for the spirit. The movie invites us to reflect about what is important to us. The different journeys through Grand Tour show the importance for us to keep faithful to ourselves. Why do we need the wealth positions? Why do we need to keep doing what is unpleasure? Does it worth while to die for what we believe? Maybe yes or maybe it doesn't matter the end but the moment only by itself and what we get at each time; future is only a ghost which decorates our minds towards the momentum.
This evening I have been to the cinema and seen Miguel Gomes' "Grand Tour 2024"
"SHOW DON'T TELL!" - IS a well known rule of storytelling, yet still this film chooses to use a narrator telling important parts of the story without playing them out!
Curious? Considering seeing it?
Don't! Unless you appreciate: the WEIRD, ABSTRACT and uncomprehensible?
7 (Seven) people in the audience walked out of the movie theatre during the film!
ONE next to me FELL ASLEEP and I would have let him sleep - IF it wasn't for him SNORING LOUDLY!
A QUOTE IN the film is: - "the Orient is uncomprehensible for white men!"
BUT ALAS I believe that some from the audiences comments after are correct: - "Pretentious crap"! And "frustrating ending"!
I - "soldiered through", because I am driven by curiosity and a desire to comprehend!
BUT it is an illogical mess: the: "English or American" characters speak Portuguese and some Asians spoke French! Yet they have conversations in respective languages!
It's supposed to be happening 1918, but suddenly we're in present time, cellphones modern cities and scooters!
Generally - DON'T!
"SHOW DON'T TELL!" - IS a well known rule of storytelling, yet still this film chooses to use a narrator telling important parts of the story without playing them out!
Curious? Considering seeing it?
Don't! Unless you appreciate: the WEIRD, ABSTRACT and uncomprehensible?
7 (Seven) people in the audience walked out of the movie theatre during the film!
ONE next to me FELL ASLEEP and I would have let him sleep - IF it wasn't for him SNORING LOUDLY!
A QUOTE IN the film is: - "the Orient is uncomprehensible for white men!"
BUT ALAS I believe that some from the audiences comments after are correct: - "Pretentious crap"! And "frustrating ending"!
I - "soldiered through", because I am driven by curiosity and a desire to comprehend!
BUT it is an illogical mess: the: "English or American" characters speak Portuguese and some Asians spoke French! Yet they have conversations in respective languages!
It's supposed to be happening 1918, but suddenly we're in present time, cellphones modern cities and scooters!
Generally - DON'T!
And I don't mean the story alright? The artistic choices are downright baffling in a way that made me continuously ask myself "why". Why go through all this trouble to tell this story? Why this story? Why the odd language solutions? Why the anachronism? Is this about colonialism? I ought to be about colonialism because these people are terrible right?
I try to relax and enjoy the cinematic experience but experience what? The photo is good, the costumes are nice, the parts from modern day east Asia could have worked in a documentary. It's soup and meatloaf and dessert mixed as one dish. I would have liked it more if it was just abstract. Now I'm just annoyed, provoked and thinking whether I'm thinking too much or not thinking enough. At least the story will lead somewhere, right? Whelp, never mind.
I try to relax and enjoy the cinematic experience but experience what? The photo is good, the costumes are nice, the parts from modern day east Asia could have worked in a documentary. It's soup and meatloaf and dessert mixed as one dish. I would have liked it more if it was just abstract. Now I'm just annoyed, provoked and thinking whether I'm thinking too much or not thinking enough. At least the story will lead somewhere, right? Whelp, never mind.
Miguel Gomes is a Portuguese director, iconoclast and postmodern. His work may seem strange to us if we are used to the "Hollywood diet". However, his idea of adapting W. Somerset Maugham in these times became «Grand Tour», a story of contemporary resonance. In the film someone says that Westerners will never understand Eastern cultures, and the film is the evidence, but Gomes came out of the test with flying colors with the visual and sound solutions he gave to this great journey, for which he was awarded the Best Director award at the Cannes film festival in 2024.
I think many of us may like «Canticle of All Creatures» (2006), about St. Francis and St. Clare; the passionate romance of «Tabu» (2012) and the experimental short «Redemption» (2013); we may find the musical docudrama of country life «Our Beloved Month of August» (2008) or the self-referential film made during the pandemic «The Tsugua Diaries» (2021) rather complicated, but we all agree that he is an author of great wit.
In the plot of the film, set in 1918, an Englishman named Edward Abbott (Gonçalo Waddington) who lives and works in Rangoon arrives in Mandalay in his wedding suit to meet his fiancée Molly, but he suddenly decides to leave Burma and flee to Singapore. At his destination, a telegram arrives from Molly announcing that she will follow him there, so Edward decides to escape to Thailand by train. When the train derails, thanks to a guide and his three wives he reaches Bangkok, but another telegram from Molly arrives there and Edward flees to Vietnam and from there to the Philippines, Japan and finally China. Along the way he meets fascinating people, but Edward's escape, after an hour, becomes iterative, when suddenly, 63 minutes into the film, we do not see Edward anymore and so enters the scene Molly (Crista Alfaiate), a determined and passionate woman who will dominate the rest of the plot and raise the tone and rhythm of the film until reaching the beautiful poetic ending that the scriptwriters gave to these characters with such an ungrateful destiny.
The story of Edward and Molly is inspired by W. Somerset Maugham's story «Mabel», all the details of the trip were suggested by his travel book «The Gentleman in the Parlour. A Record of a Journey from Rangoon to Haiphong», and I suppose that the allusions to Edward being a spy are based on the fact that Somerset worked for the British Secret Service during World War I. And indeed, the Cannes award is well deserved for the visual and musical resources it proposes: to illustrate each city of the "grand tour" in 1918, instead of giving us BBC-style period reconstructions, Gomes uses contemporary images of each city, suggesting that these stories take place at any time in history.
Gomes combined black and white with colour images, introduced shadow theatre and puppet sequences, and shot in studio scenes in sets of jungles and interiors of mansions of great plastic beauty (thanks to the Portuguese cinematographer Rui Poças, the Chinese Guo Liang, and the Thai Sayombhu Mukdeeprom, a frequent collaborator of Apichatpong Weerasethakul). The musical selection ranges from Johann Strauss II's "On the Beautiful Blue Danube" (1866) to Charles Trenet's "La mer" (1946), in a 1959 version by Bobby Darin, to Gabriel Ruiz Galindo's classic "Amor" (1944), performed by a band of old Chinese jazzmen in the film.
My only complaint is that the film drags on a bit, especially in the montages of modern views of each place on the tour, which is a brilliant idea, but could have used some trimming. However, «Grand Tour» is different, healthy cinema, not a recycling of old vampires or a story of people of confused gender, but a refreshing take on adventure film and romantic drama.
I think many of us may like «Canticle of All Creatures» (2006), about St. Francis and St. Clare; the passionate romance of «Tabu» (2012) and the experimental short «Redemption» (2013); we may find the musical docudrama of country life «Our Beloved Month of August» (2008) or the self-referential film made during the pandemic «The Tsugua Diaries» (2021) rather complicated, but we all agree that he is an author of great wit.
In the plot of the film, set in 1918, an Englishman named Edward Abbott (Gonçalo Waddington) who lives and works in Rangoon arrives in Mandalay in his wedding suit to meet his fiancée Molly, but he suddenly decides to leave Burma and flee to Singapore. At his destination, a telegram arrives from Molly announcing that she will follow him there, so Edward decides to escape to Thailand by train. When the train derails, thanks to a guide and his three wives he reaches Bangkok, but another telegram from Molly arrives there and Edward flees to Vietnam and from there to the Philippines, Japan and finally China. Along the way he meets fascinating people, but Edward's escape, after an hour, becomes iterative, when suddenly, 63 minutes into the film, we do not see Edward anymore and so enters the scene Molly (Crista Alfaiate), a determined and passionate woman who will dominate the rest of the plot and raise the tone and rhythm of the film until reaching the beautiful poetic ending that the scriptwriters gave to these characters with such an ungrateful destiny.
The story of Edward and Molly is inspired by W. Somerset Maugham's story «Mabel», all the details of the trip were suggested by his travel book «The Gentleman in the Parlour. A Record of a Journey from Rangoon to Haiphong», and I suppose that the allusions to Edward being a spy are based on the fact that Somerset worked for the British Secret Service during World War I. And indeed, the Cannes award is well deserved for the visual and musical resources it proposes: to illustrate each city of the "grand tour" in 1918, instead of giving us BBC-style period reconstructions, Gomes uses contemporary images of each city, suggesting that these stories take place at any time in history.
Gomes combined black and white with colour images, introduced shadow theatre and puppet sequences, and shot in studio scenes in sets of jungles and interiors of mansions of great plastic beauty (thanks to the Portuguese cinematographer Rui Poças, the Chinese Guo Liang, and the Thai Sayombhu Mukdeeprom, a frequent collaborator of Apichatpong Weerasethakul). The musical selection ranges from Johann Strauss II's "On the Beautiful Blue Danube" (1866) to Charles Trenet's "La mer" (1946), in a 1959 version by Bobby Darin, to Gabriel Ruiz Galindo's classic "Amor" (1944), performed by a band of old Chinese jazzmen in the film.
My only complaint is that the film drags on a bit, especially in the montages of modern views of each place on the tour, which is a brilliant idea, but could have used some trimming. However, «Grand Tour» is different, healthy cinema, not a recycling of old vampires or a story of people of confused gender, but a refreshing take on adventure film and romantic drama.
Never have I ever been so annoyed at the cinema, but stayed for the whole thing out of respect for other viewers.
This movie has no plot, no relatable characters, no compelling story. The comedic reliefs are utterly unfunny (really, why does anyone laughs at women cursing at men anymore? Peak boomer humor). It does not evoke any feelings other than a deep feeling of irritation and wasted time. It's really oddly paced and quite frankly, boring.
Some shots are pretty (if you've never been to Asia) and I have to appreciate the use of traditional asian music.
However, it's not enough to make up for how badly it is structured and how really pointless this movie is. One of the worst films I've ever seen (and I'm usually quite generous with my ratings).
This movie has no plot, no relatable characters, no compelling story. The comedic reliefs are utterly unfunny (really, why does anyone laughs at women cursing at men anymore? Peak boomer humor). It does not evoke any feelings other than a deep feeling of irritation and wasted time. It's really oddly paced and quite frankly, boring.
Some shots are pretty (if you've never been to Asia) and I have to appreciate the use of traditional asian music.
However, it's not enough to make up for how badly it is structured and how really pointless this movie is. One of the worst films I've ever seen (and I'm usually quite generous with my ratings).
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPeriod scenes were shot in studio. Present day scenes were shot live on location, without script.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Büyük Yolculuk
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 53.804 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 9176 USD
- 30 mar 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 878.242 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 9 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Grand Tour (2024) officially released in Canada in French?
Rispondi