Una psicologa infantile vedova vive un'esistenza isolata nella rurale Nuova Inghilterra. Sorpresa da una pericolosa tempesta, deve trovare un modo per salvare un ragazzino prima che scompaia... Leggi tuttoUna psicologa infantile vedova vive un'esistenza isolata nella rurale Nuova Inghilterra. Sorpresa da una pericolosa tempesta, deve trovare un modo per salvare un ragazzino prima che scompaia per sempre.Una psicologa infantile vedova vive un'esistenza isolata nella rurale Nuova Inghilterra. Sorpresa da una pericolosa tempesta, deve trovare un modo per salvare un ragazzino prima che scompaia per sempre.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
Released in 2016, Shut In was acquired by Luc Besson's joint venture with Relativity, Relativity EuropaCorp Distribution, which was Luc Besson's attempt to gain a foothold in distribution within the United States after having seen profits from Blockbusters such as the Taken franchise and Lucy kept by Fox and Universal respectively. The screenplay for Shut In written by Christina Hodson had appeared on the 2012 Blacklist of best unproduced screenplays, and the script was acquired by Europacorp for development in 2014 when the company was seeking genre fare to build their release slate. Shut In marks the second, and so far last feature film effort of British TV director Farren Blackburn whose work can be seen in The Fades, Doctor Who, and The Musketeers, and also helmed a number of episodes for Netflix Marvel series Daredevil, Iron Fist, and The Defenders. The movie received terrible reviews from critics and audiences and was a commercial dud upon release. Rightly so because Shut In is an absolute mess of a movie and probably one of the worst mainstream horror films of the 2010s.
The movie's first hour is filled with terribly uninteresting melodrama with Naomi Watts saddled with a lead weight of a role (which Watts was in my opinion unfairly nominated for a Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress) who's so poorly written that we never actually see her do anything constructive as a child psychologist with almost all of her patient interactions either done off camera or featuring her character distracted and not really doing anything. Watts is clearly trying to give the role something, but the movie is so bereft of anything interesting for the first hour that it ratches up the fake out dream sequences and jump scares to the point the film gets desperate enough to give us a "racoon scare". I can't really go into anymore detail than that, but there's an absolutely ludicrous twist in the movie that only works if several dozen people were blind and/or stupid because there's absolutely no way that what this character does would've been possible to fool this many people who (supposedly) went through an extensive amount of education and certification.
Shut In is absolutely awful. While the movie is well shot and the actors are trying to give something to their thinly written roles, the movie is boring for the first hour then becomes crazy, stupid, and nonsensical in the last 30 minutes. If the movie had been that level of stupid in the last act throughout the entire movie I might've recommended this as a "so bad, it's good" viewing experience, but from its dour tone to its stoic performances the movie just feels boring and never comes to life.
This film is about a psychologist, played by Watts, following a car accident that killed her husband and left her son paralyzed (played by Stranger Things' Charlie Heaton). She starts to think that someone is inside her house trying to harm her. Who could it be though? Her son is paralyzed and immobile? The plot doesn't even sound interesting and there really isn't anything in the film that you could actually enjoy. The film is devoid of any actual chills, the scenes meant to make you jump are set up in a way that is so manufactured over the years, where you know exactly what to expect.
The film just kind of throws characters into the mix and you are left wondering what purpose they really serve? Poor Jacob Tremblay, going from a wonderful performance in Room, to being thrown into something like this. The twist ending is so awful. Its half expected but doesn't bother offering any consolation for wasting your time. There's honestly too much going on in this film, its too busy with people and trying too hard to deliver a substantial story but it comes off really uninspired, tired, and boring. The twist also offers some really weird awkward moments too.
Check this out if you want but there's really nothing to see here. Shut yourself out.
4/10
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOddly, Charlie Heaton gets an "Introducing" credit, even though he had already been in several other movies before this one. The "Introducing" credit is normally reserved for first time film actors.
- BlooperA child is declared missing after somehow finding his way to his former psychologist's home during freezing, winter weather. Not only aren't police overly concerned about the matter, when local news reports are shown, this is somehow not the major story.
- Citazioni
[first lines]
Doug: Hey. It's going to be okay.
Richard: Just tell me we're doing the right thing.
Doug: No, sweetheart, I know you want to fix this. It's what you do. But we've tried. All right? We've been trying and look where it's gotten us.
[looking over at their son waiting in the car]
Doug: And I think the space is gonna be good for him. For all of us. Besides, it's a good school. He'll be home by the end of the summer.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Half in the Bag: Shut in and Arrival (2016)
- Colonne sonoreHush Little Baby
Traditional
Public Domain
I più visti
- How long is Shut In?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 10.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 6.900.335 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.613.567 USD
- 13 nov 2016
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 13.082.071 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 31 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1