Duk sit dai jong
- 2023
- 2h 15min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,2/10
2192
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dopo che la sua negligenza fa andare in prigione una donna innocente, un avvocato e i suoi colleghi lavorano per riabilitare il suo nome.Dopo che la sua negligenza fa andare in prigione una donna innocente, un avvocato e i suoi colleghi lavorano per riabilitare il suo nome.Dopo che la sua negligenza fa andare in prigione una donna innocente, un avvocato e i suoi colleghi lavorano per riabilitare il suo nome.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 5 vittorie e 17 candidature totali
Adam Pak
- Dr Desmond Chung
- (as Adam Tin-Nam Pak)
Recensioni in evidenza
10bvmjdt
The script/plot, the acting and the pacing of the movie are top notch. It does a very good job in not reviewing the key plot until the very end. A climax is built up till the final showdown in the courtroom.
It certainly does not feel like a 2.25h movie and it's entertaining from the start till the end. Much effort has been put into crafting the dialogue between the barristers which does not make it corny but totally refreshing.
Feels like one of the very good HK movie in its golden era in the 80s. It deserves a film award and best actor award.
A 10 clap production.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This review comes from Singapore.
It certainly does not feel like a 2.25h movie and it's entertaining from the start till the end. Much effort has been put into crafting the dialogue between the barristers which does not make it corny but totally refreshing.
Feels like one of the very good HK movie in its golden era in the 80s. It deserves a film award and best actor award.
A 10 clap production.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
This review comes from Singapore.
Obviously this movie has an alternative motive. It's a complaint to the system but over the top, almost as if in sulking anger and disenchantment. Maybe disillusioned as well.
Supposedly based on a real life case but this court room drama takes a life on its own. I like the acting of the crown lawyer much better as he's a bit more restrained. But then that's the counter to the defending lawyer.
The case is about a cover-up really. Of rich family blaming the poor or underprivileged. It's not bad, but probably picks up what the sentiment of the general population. So kind of court room Rocky. A feel good movie. So don't expect any logic in the arguments , or any legal sense or the court proceedings to be accurate in any stretch. It's all for dramatic effect.
Supposedly based on a real life case but this court room drama takes a life on its own. I like the acting of the crown lawyer much better as he's a bit more restrained. But then that's the counter to the defending lawyer.
The case is about a cover-up really. Of rich family blaming the poor or underprivileged. It's not bad, but probably picks up what the sentiment of the general population. So kind of court room Rocky. A feel good movie. So don't expect any logic in the arguments , or any legal sense or the court proceedings to be accurate in any stretch. It's all for dramatic effect.
10ACDC1986
In true poignant fashion illustrating the hurt and pain endured by Hong Kongers.
Perfectly paints the current political climate against a tyrannical regime and its blatant infiltration into the judicial system in what was once a highly touted and respected legal system that sought to seek a fair and impartial trials for all. The fall of a flourishing former British Colony....a battle cry for the ages against internal injustices compromised by greed and power.
Superb acting by Dayo Wong and supporting cast. A palatable performance that transitions with sprinkled comedic effect throughout, but does not stray from an important message and underlying theme- a guilty conscience.
Certain moments are sensationalized for entertainment effect and don't represent reality ie) a lawyers professional demeanor. Otherwise a brilliant and entertaining legal drama from start to finish.
10/10.
Perfectly paints the current political climate against a tyrannical regime and its blatant infiltration into the judicial system in what was once a highly touted and respected legal system that sought to seek a fair and impartial trials for all. The fall of a flourishing former British Colony....a battle cry for the ages against internal injustices compromised by greed and power.
Superb acting by Dayo Wong and supporting cast. A palatable performance that transitions with sprinkled comedic effect throughout, but does not stray from an important message and underlying theme- a guilty conscience.
Certain moments are sensationalized for entertainment effect and don't represent reality ie) a lawyers professional demeanor. Otherwise a brilliant and entertaining legal drama from start to finish.
10/10.
"Adrian Lam" (Dayo Wong) is a magistrate who doesn't really care about his job. He gets a bit of a shock, though, when his new boss sends him back to the benches where he must, again, actually practice law. It's here, after a night on the booze, that he turns up to defend a woman charged with the negligent homicide of her young son. A combination of his laziness, incompetence and his hangover leaves this woman hung out to dry when one of the witnesses - from whom he didn't get a written deposition - changes his story. Off to jail she goes and into a maelstrom of despair goes he before the guilt starts to kick in, and he decides to get his act together. His co-defending counsel "Evelyn" from the original trial (Renci Yeung) and he decide to try and convince the convicted "Jolene" (Louise Wong) to let them work on an appeal and the remainder of this rather flat courtroom drama follows their efforts. It starts off quite entertainingly, with a bit of a tetchy dynamic between the lawyers and to be fair, Dayo Wong is quite proficient as the bored and rather indolent lawyer. Sadly, though, once the ship is all upright again, the story becomes one of rather predicable family intrigue and power-broking that exposes us to many from a supporting cast that are as unremarkable as the dialogue. The photography has something of a television feature to it and the denouement, though quite lively paced - well you can see that coming from space. At 2¼ hours it is also far too long with just not enough meat on the story to sustain it. Perhaps a more judiciously cut edit and a few fewer side-stories might have made it more of a watchable "Perry Mason" style drama, but as it is - I was a bit bored by the end.
A Guilty Conscience has some of the most absurd, implausible courtroom scenes I have ever seen. The climax is so dramatic that it makes soap operas look grounded. It looks like the most exhausting trial ever. Lawyers shout at each other as if they are in a heated debate contest.
Our protagonist is the lawyer version of Doctor House: A bitter, talky person that solves cases in his own way. He is played by Dayo Wong, who used to be an infamous box office poison. Here he is better than ever (This doesn't mean he is great). The start of the plot is standard legal drama material (Think a Law and Order episode). Wong fails a big case involving a child's death, causing harm to an innocent person. Two years later the case returns... Yes, a Guilty Conscience recycles an ancient "redemption arc" story, yet it is done in a gloriously entertaining way.
None of the story is believable. They exist in an overwritten screenplay. Despite looking like and sounding like one, this is not a screwball comedy. Although when you think about it, certain parts are funny for the wrong reasons. The sudden rise of absurdity leaves me with a mixed feeling, but I sure am entertained.
NOTE: If you're planning to see this in theaters, be aware that the audio mixing is obnoxiously terrible. The dialogue is so loud, and gets covered by the even more deafening music. I felt like the lawyers were shouting beside my ears during the trial.
Our protagonist is the lawyer version of Doctor House: A bitter, talky person that solves cases in his own way. He is played by Dayo Wong, who used to be an infamous box office poison. Here he is better than ever (This doesn't mean he is great). The start of the plot is standard legal drama material (Think a Law and Order episode). Wong fails a big case involving a child's death, causing harm to an innocent person. Two years later the case returns... Yes, a Guilty Conscience recycles an ancient "redemption arc" story, yet it is done in a gloriously entertaining way.
None of the story is believable. They exist in an overwritten screenplay. Despite looking like and sounding like one, this is not a screwball comedy. Although when you think about it, certain parts are funny for the wrong reasons. The sudden rise of absurdity leaves me with a mixed feeling, but I sure am entertained.
NOTE: If you're planning to see this in theaters, be aware that the audio mixing is obnoxiously terrible. The dialogue is so loud, and gets covered by the even more deafening music. I felt like the lawyers were shouting beside my ears during the trial.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe first Hong Kong film to top HK$100m at local box office on 21 Feb, 2023.
- Citazioni
Adrian Lam: Today, here, everything is wrong!
- ConnessioniReferenced in The Popcorn Show: "A Guilty Conscience" Movie (2023)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is A Guilty Conscience?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- A Guilty Conscience
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 22.200.000 HKD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 14.911.562 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 15 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Duk sit dai jong (2023) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi