Level with Me

Anyone willing to think outside of the box, can put the pieces together that the moon landing was fake. What society calls 'Flat Earthers' are really just heliocentric deniers, and don't necessarily believe the earth is completely flat.

As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.

The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.

It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.

Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.

Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.

While this one is an improvement for not having a droning narrator spout baseless assertions for an hour, it's only a slight improvement in that it has a variety of speakers choppily cut together spouting baseless assertions and accusations for an hour. It closes with another appeal to conspiracy and some weak fear-mongering.

As a factual "documentary" it fails on every front, and is more reminescent of 1980's public-access infomercials from various cults (look up the Heaven's Gate VHS tapes for an example).

You could argue that this entire series is a successful record of the wide-ranging baseless conspiracy theories of the early-21st century's flat earth cult. It is fascinating how these ideas find something to resonate with in the vast echo-chambers of social media and the way the resulting mishmash of vague untested ideas, factually incorrect memes, and conspiracy theories tie together for the "true believers" (who are, ironically, urging other people to questions the liars). In that sense, this film and the others in the series might be worthwhile for current and future social scientists who are researching the way online cults form.

For everyone else, this is a bad-faith attempt at a "documentary" that's nearly unwatchable. Believe the bad reviews, save your time, and watch anything else.

The fantasy that is FE is dying. And with good reason. All these fools can do is spout nonsensical fantasies that have ZERO basis in fact.

This third film is as far from a "ducumentary" as the other two. It's unwatchable nonsense for anyone with half a brain.

Not much more to add to this excellent review by vaulthunter-11946:

"A bunch of conspiracy crackpots showing off their incompetence and ignorance. The first couple of times were pretty laughable.

The joke stops being funny the third time.

Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related. To them, there's no such thing as space. The stars are just spots on the "firmament", the sun and moon are so close that planes are in danger of crashing in to them (or they're illusions, or they're also just lights on the firmament, or anything else but the truth). Every video, every photo, is a CGI fake (even the ones so old that they predate CGI). Satellites obviously don't exist, they're either held up with weather balloons or they're faked with ground-based systems, including a network of oceanic buoys to explain how ships can use GPS when far from land. The ad hoc nonsense, often contradicting itself piles higher and deeper.

Moon landing deniers, BTW, hate them for stealing their work and tying it to even stupider nonsense.

And then there's Challenger. For those out of the loop, that's the space shuttle that exploded in 1986, killing seven astronauts.

But since "space is fake", the flerfs have to convince themselves that the disaster was fake. And so they've decided that those astronauts were never in the shuttle, and are still alive under fake identities. And they've picked out a few people who they've decided are those fake identities.

Some of them are completely unrelated people who look kind of similar, if your glasses are smudged, and have similar names. A couple are siblings of the departed.

The "identification" requires the idiotic assumption that the mysterious "They" who orchestrate these conspiracies were dumb enough to create entire new identities for the dead astronauts, but for some reason gave them the same names, or change only their first name and pose as their own fictional brother.

And they proceed to harass these people, trying to get them to "admit" to their part in the idiotic "conspiracy". And that's a substantial part of this video. Footage of them harassing people who have no connection to anything and just want to live their lives, or worse, people who lost a close relative and are now being accused of faking the whole thing.

A despicable thing to do at all. But worse to film it and publicise it, and implicitly encourage others to likewise harass the unfortunate targets.

These vermin are proud of their harassment. They shouldn't be. This is beyond any standard of decency"

While I'm not sure about the conclusion, this movie is really well done, for such a low budget film. I think anyone who honestly, approaches the work, with an open mind, will at least be intrigued, and come away questioning everything they thought they new.

The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.

The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.

I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.

Great job!

"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."

2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.

Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.

And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?