Level with Me

If this had been presented as a satire, it would work. Sadly, they think this rubbish is true. I've never seen such a twisted, border-line insane take on science.

How this currently as a four star rating is a mind-numbing mystery. It's proof of how many uneducated, naive and gullible people there are who will believe patently false nonsense.

Every true scientist should be posting reviews, although this is so ridiculous as to not even require debunking. Why someone would chose to believe something that can be proved incorrect through a variety of real-world observations without scientific instruments is shocking.

Anyone willing to think outside of the box, can put the pieces together that the moon landing was fake. What society calls 'Flat Earthers' are really just heliocentric deniers, and don't necessarily believe the earth is completely flat.

As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.

The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.

It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.

Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.

Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.

"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."

2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.

Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.

And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?

While I'm not sure about the conclusion, this movie is really well done, for such a low budget film. I think anyone who honestly, approaches the work, with an open mind, will at least be intrigued, and come away questioning everything they thought they new.

The lighting is not perfect in some scenes, the audio can be a little uneven, but there is a lot of outdoor, real locations, pretty brave move by the director.

The participants are the real hidden gems in my opinion, they each add their own flavor, to what I found really entertaining, and that's what it's about.

I was actually surprised how the story came together, and must admit, I have a lot of questions.

Great job!

Remember, these "brilliant" flat earthers want you to believe the Challenger astronauts who died just got moved but didn't change their names. Seriously?

Utter garbage from con artists. Not even anything different from before. They just regurgitate the same nonsense from video to video and expect their tinfoil hat followers to stand in awe of their brilliance.

Go watch SciManDan's recap of these on YouTube for a better understanding of how terrible it really is.

Get back to us when you flat earthers find a working map of Flatopia... one with a scale so it's useful. Until then we all know the saying... Gotta lie to flerf.