Lizzie Borden's Revenge

Similar to 2011 film Bloody Mary, also starring Veronica Ricci. This is a lower budget homemade type horror slasher not to be taken too serious considering it's low cheap looking special effects and subpar acting. There is slightly more depth to like about this film compared to Bloody Mary. Featuring a sorority group of women it was expected their to be a showcase of women showing skin. Skin mostly shown from Veronica Ricci and briefly from Mindy Robinson in a brief role (which was disappointing considering her character. She should have lasted longer).

Overall this is simply a non memorable cheap slasher with some urban tale revalating.

This is a good nudity film with some live tits and ass. The girls look good, and the soft core scenes are nice. The acting is decent, what you would expect from a low budget soft core movie. The suspense is good, I was surprised quite a few times. The Lizzie Borden relative part of the plot is new, and added an interesting twist to the movie. Also, the half insane sister was cryptic and cute. There was a bit of gore, but nothing too stomach turning. All in all this was a nice film with good looking naked girls having fun with a bit of supernatural horror and suspense added in to make it an interesting plot. Not grade A block buster, but a fun movie to watch for some laughs, scares, and hot chick watching.

When you think of all the up and coming film makers who would jump at the opportunity to get funding to make a movie you have to ask yourself why this piece of nonsense ever got made. As previous reviewers have said it has all the acting,directing and content quality of a 70's porn movie without the porn! It's hard to imagine that the people involved in producing this film sat around looking at the days shooting and thinking " this is good". Just the first few minutes sets the tone of the rest of the movie. Who did they get to play Mr. Borden?...a friend who fancied being in a movie?....the pizza delivery guy who had a spare few minutes? Total rubbish..if you love films avoid at all costs.

Ah, yes. Dennis Devine.

To paraphrase Withnail, I watched this movie by mistake on YouTube, on a tablet, while waiting for a delayed flight.

As someone else asked: why?

As in: why are such movies made? Who bankrolls 'em? Do they make any money? What is the unseen, unknown part of the equation here? I do not see it, I certainly do not know it...

To me, this movie seems like something a bunch of (probably drunk) friends could have come together to make using an iPhone camera - as a joke. You know, as something they'd later show to other friends - as a joke.

But it ain't that. It's an actual movie production (such as it is). And I don't get it. Is it - specifically - made for people who watch movies whilst drunk or stoned? Is there a whole, separate market (demography) for such movies that I'm not aware of? But - if so - er...WHY (again)? Wouldn't it be cheaper and more sustainable for everyone involved if that demography just watched random YouTube clips of - I don't know - fat dudes on trampolines, cats slapping unaware dogs, soccer players accidentally getting kicked in the nuts, and so on?

How are movies like this a part of the movie industry in the post-Internet era? (I guess that's what I'm asking).

Fascinating phenomenon.

No more words are needed. I've added this sentence as my review was too short.