J.S.K - Janaki V v/s State of Kerala
- 2025
- 2h 34min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,9/10
2635
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una donna subisce un terribile crimine e, con l'aiuto dell'avvocato David Abel Donovan, sfida il sistema giudiziario indiano per ottenere giustizia, nonostante gli ostacoli e i pregiudizi de... Leggi tuttoUna donna subisce un terribile crimine e, con l'aiuto dell'avvocato David Abel Donovan, sfida il sistema giudiziario indiano per ottenere giustizia, nonostante gli ostacoli e i pregiudizi della società.Una donna subisce un terribile crimine e, con l'aiuto dell'avvocato David Abel Donovan, sfida il sistema giudiziario indiano per ottenere giustizia, nonostante gli ostacoli e i pregiudizi della società.
Baiju Santhosh
- S I Kanakaraj
- (as Baiju)
Recensioni in evidenza
Why did they even made such a stupid logic less movie. This is worst movie I watched ever in my life, no story, no sense dragging around 3hrs. In the beginning she wants to retain baby and suddenly she wants it to abort it, I don't see the logic here.they dragged this movie without any solid twist. Total timewaste.
Excellent movie with wonderful story telling and a great feel to it. It's fast paced and surprises you on the way.
Anupama is excellent in her central role. She plays the character well. Suresh Gopi as always is on point. Everyone adds very well to the proceedings.
The right scene at the very end is stunning in its execution as is a chase scene. Credit to the action director for awesome stuff.
This is not a new tale, but the treatment is fresh. The courtroom scenes are not as good as it is usually in Malayalam movies.
Surely worth a watch for all the right reasons.
Anupama is excellent in her central role. She plays the character well. Suresh Gopi as always is on point. Everyone adds very well to the proceedings.
The right scene at the very end is stunning in its execution as is a chase scene. Credit to the action director for awesome stuff.
This is not a new tale, but the treatment is fresh. The courtroom scenes are not as good as it is usually in Malayalam movies.
Surely worth a watch for all the right reasons.
The movie talks about the atrocity that happened towards Janaki & how with the help of the judiciary she fights for her justice is all about shown in the film.
Performance wise SG & Anupama had given justice to their roles. In the 1st half we could see the fire brand performance of SG which raised the expectations to watch for 2nd half. Another lead role was of Shruti Ramachandran which came late in the 2nd half but she also gave a notable performance in her screen presence.
Director Pravin Narayanan who also penned the story had done a good research in legalities aspect which made the courtroom sequence interesting but speaking of the content, it's been too old to discuss.
The path at which the 1st half which made it interesting & raised the urge to watch for the 2nd half, but when comes to the 2nd half it was a nose div. It was a mixture of investigation and drama & at one point it became bored as it feels repetitive.
Performance space of SG was not much in 2nd half which further lowered the interest. Climax fight sequence was well choreographed but the excess of drama had overshadowed.
Ghibran's score had given some escalating moments. Cinematography was not captivating.
Another major drawback was of casting of Madhav Suresh. The worst performance in this movie. If given an electric shock, still there would be no expression coming from his face.
Well as a whole JSK is not a movie where we would be forced to leave in mid way but it also doesn't quench the thirst we were looking for a SG Film.
Performance wise SG & Anupama had given justice to their roles. In the 1st half we could see the fire brand performance of SG which raised the expectations to watch for 2nd half. Another lead role was of Shruti Ramachandran which came late in the 2nd half but she also gave a notable performance in her screen presence.
Director Pravin Narayanan who also penned the story had done a good research in legalities aspect which made the courtroom sequence interesting but speaking of the content, it's been too old to discuss.
The path at which the 1st half which made it interesting & raised the urge to watch for the 2nd half, but when comes to the 2nd half it was a nose div. It was a mixture of investigation and drama & at one point it became bored as it feels repetitive.
Performance space of SG was not much in 2nd half which further lowered the interest. Climax fight sequence was well choreographed but the excess of drama had overshadowed.
Ghibran's score had given some escalating moments. Cinematography was not captivating.
Another major drawback was of casting of Madhav Suresh. The worst performance in this movie. If given an electric shock, still there would be no expression coming from his face.
Well as a whole JSK is not a movie where we would be forced to leave in mid way but it also doesn't quench the thirst we were looking for a SG Film.
Such a good movie. This film is welcome as it clearly highlights the right of all living beings in our country to live as they please and the protection of women and those who abuse them. Good story.. And an example of how even a common man can get justice if our Indian Constitution is used properly. Family watch movie.
The movie sets out to be a gripping courtroom drama with a strong central story - a woman's unexpected tragedy and her relentless fight for justice against a failing system. The premise holds great potential, and the cast delivers commendable performances. No actor feels out of place, and at times the natural dialogue adds to the realism.
However, the film's promise quickly fades due to poor storytelling and weak execution. The early thrilling tone is overshadowed by overly dramatic and sometimes unnecessary dialogues, which break the flow and dilute tension. Direction remains average throughout, failing to hold the narrative together. The cinematography is particularly disappointing; in a genre that thrives on intensity and sharp visuals, the bland camera work makes the courtroom scenes dull instead of gripping.
The climax, instead of delivering a punch, takes an awkward turn with an unnecessary fight sequence that feels both forced and tiring. Worse, it shifts the focus away from the film's core agenda. The abrupt ending leaves the audience unsatisfied, making the journey feel incomplete.
Overall, while the core idea is strong, the film's execution undermines its potential. If you are a die-hard fan of courtroom dramas, it may be worth a one-time watch. For others, this is a film better skipped.
However, the film's promise quickly fades due to poor storytelling and weak execution. The early thrilling tone is overshadowed by overly dramatic and sometimes unnecessary dialogues, which break the flow and dilute tension. Direction remains average throughout, failing to hold the narrative together. The cinematography is particularly disappointing; in a genre that thrives on intensity and sharp visuals, the bland camera work makes the courtroom scenes dull instead of gripping.
The climax, instead of delivering a punch, takes an awkward turn with an unnecessary fight sequence that feels both forced and tiring. Worse, it shifts the focus away from the film's core agenda. The abrupt ending leaves the audience unsatisfied, making the journey feel incomplete.
Overall, while the core idea is strong, the film's execution undermines its potential. If you are a die-hard fan of courtroom dramas, it may be worth a one-time watch. For others, this is a film better skipped.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 179.205 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 34min(154 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1:2.39
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti