Peter Parker cerca di conciliare la sua vita di liceale ordinario e il suo alter ego Spider-Man, il supereroe. Si trova sulle tracce di una nuova minaccia che si aggira nei cieli di New York... Leggi tuttoPeter Parker cerca di conciliare la sua vita di liceale ordinario e il suo alter ego Spider-Man, il supereroe. Si trova sulle tracce di una nuova minaccia che si aggira nei cieli di New York.Peter Parker cerca di conciliare la sua vita di liceale ordinario e il suo alter ego Spider-Man, il supereroe. Si trova sulle tracce di una nuova minaccia che si aggira nei cieli di New York.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 10 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Recensioni in evidenza
I'm conflicted, because I know my opinion is getting more and more jaded with every new superhero flick- but I am quickly reaching the end of my rope here. All these movies feel so predictable and cliché anymore, and as much as I truly want to enjoy them it is becoming more and more difficult.
The main actors in this movie were pretty good, but what can you do with yet another weak story that has already been rehashed in other films. The writing felt subpar, and in the end it came off as being full of gimmicks and convenient sub plot.
It just doesn't feel real anymore, it doesn't feel believable. It feels like a fantasy world created for superfans who never take a step back and critique.
These superhero movies are becoming more and more uninspired, and while I try to give them all a chance I am just getting tired of it all. It feels like the quality is being diluted, all that matters anymore is the quantity. All that matters is the money.
I still hold out hope- just look at the 'zombie' genre. Just because there is dilution within the genre doesn't mean a sporadic gem can't be made. However, if you are of a similar mindset as me, you might want to keep looking elsewhere.
Thanks for reading!
Now, if you're a die-hard Spiderman fan, you'll love this adaptation, which covers the true, honest, whimsical and kinda naive nature of Peter Parker.
Photography was excellent and the musical score brings the whole city and characters to life. Keaton's work in particular was a bit underwhelming for me, but that's not his fault... it's the screenplay, which to be honest felt a bit forced and not up to standards for an MCU movie.
Nevertheless, it's a great stand-alone flick you should definitely watch. You'll have a great time, and also enjoy how Marvel wishes to develop young Parker's character from here on out.
Firstly, Peter Parker's vulnerability/invulnerability. There's a scene where Spiderman bangs his head on the roof of a truck, knocking himself unconscious, yet later on in the film, a couple of tons of concrete and steel land on the lad's head with no lasting damage. Not long after, Peter falls to the ground from a crashing jet (presumably travelling at a couple of hundred miles an hour) and gets up without a problem. Concussion one minute, indestructible the next!
Spiderman's strength is inconsistent too: Peter is holding together two halves of the Staten Island ferry in one scene, but later he is struggling to free himself from some rubble.
I also have a problem with The Avengers' very lax approach to shifting their equipment to new premises: Happy (Jon Favreau) loads all of the Avenger's weapons/armour onto an unmanned aircraft - not one person to guard it. Of course, this suited the plot, but it was extremely daft. Surely a couple of superheroes could have taken time out from saving the world to escort the precious cargo.
Last moan: did Spidey really need a high-tech suit equipped with AI and special assault modes? I thought Spiderman relied on Spidey sense.
On a more positive note, I enjoyed Peter's trials and tribulations at high-school, and thought that the twist revelation about the true identity of Vulture was well handled (I didn't see it coming). The special effects are, as always, very impressive, and Director Jon Watts handles the action well enough, but Sam Raimi needn't worry: his first two Spiderman movies remain the best.
Let's start with the positives: Michael Keaton's Vulture was everything a villain should be with an added layer of charm and depth. The high school setting and our youngest Peter so far was definitely a step in the right direction (Tom Holland is a very capable actor although though his voice did grate after a while). Even the menacing Mac Gargan, a potential 'Scorpion', was a great addition.
Now the negatives. I think the casting for Flash Thompson, Liz Allen and Ned Leeds was absolutely ridiculous. Flash is supposed to be a jock who bullies Peter - not a smaller Asian guy who is also a member of the same quiz team! And that throwaway 'M J' comment at the end - unforgivable!!!
The costume AI also didn't work for me. I appreciate that this is a tool to integrate Spidey into the MCU - but for me he works better when he is on his own, a guy in a cloth suit overcoming the odds with a mixture of bravery and science.
I can appreciate that Homecoming had some issues to get over, especially as the other movie incarnations covered his unique origin in such depth. Was it brave to avoid the origin altogether - or did it detract from really getting us onside? Maybe a 20 minute opening section with Peter narrating, recapping his origin might have helped...
I've no doubt that younger viewers would have enjoyed this movie (and maybe that was the aim), but fans of the 60's, 70's or 80's Spidey might have wondered what had happened to their favourite wallcrawler.
For me, the first 45 minutes of Raimi's 'Spider-Man' nailed it and SM2 was equally as good. My GF, who has no knowledge of the Spider- Man lore, left the cinema with me and remarked 'that was the worst one'.
Though I don't necessarily agree with that comment, I certainly wasn't ready to hail SM:Homecoming as an all conquering triumph, instead a rather weak chapter in the MCU series.
Sorry Spidey, I so wanted to love this movie! Maybe better next time...
Which Actors Almost Played Spider-Man?
Which Actors Almost Played Spider-Man?
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn an interview from 2013, while promoting his upcoming film, Come vivo ora (2013), Tom Holland was asked by a reporter what kind of role he might want to try next. When Holland replied, saying a project with action and humor would be of interest to him, the reporter asked if he would ever like to play a superhero. "Maybe Spider-Man, in ten years time," answered Holland. "The reboot of the reboot, if they do that."
- Blooper(at around 39 mins) It is established multiple times in dialogue that Liz's house party is held on a Friday night, yet Peter and Ned have school the next day.
- Citazioni
Ned Leeds: Peter, are you okay?
Spider-Man: Yeah. Just keep trying to get through to Happy.
Ned Leeds: It's been an honor, Spider-Man.
[library lights turn on]
Ms. Warren: What are you doing here? There's a dance.
Ned Leeds: Uh...
[quickly shuts his laptop]
Ned Leeds: [awkwardly] I'm... looking... at porn.
- Curiosità sui creditiAt the end of the closing credits, there is a Public Service Announcement by Captain America on patience.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Fuck You, It's January!!!: Fuck You, It's Forever!!! (2017)
- Colonne sonoreTheme from Marvel's Avengers
Written by Alan Silvestri
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Spider-Man: De regreso a casa
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 175.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 334.952.829 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 117.027.503 USD
- 9 lug 2017
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 880.978.185 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 13 minuti
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1