Dhoomam

We should encourage more such stories that promise a better future.

It could have been a better ending with some punchline and some redemption. The ending was abrupt.

Of course it succeeded in describing marketing strategies and greed of industries like tobacco that thrive on addiction of it's customers.

One thing that I noticed was that most male character were not smoking but many women were. Especially in India where the larger proportion of smokers are male, this seemed incomprehensible. The men or boy who died of cigarette smoking were not characterised, but only referred. That was another missing point in the script.

The start is with the protagonist Faahad Fasilgiving lift to his friend (Aparna Balamurali) in an audi car in rain only to get injected with some drug by a stranger and finds himself on top of a hill with the car exploding minutes after him walking out. As unconvincing as it is, the screenplay is too far from reality as Faahad has revealed super strength like powers who carries Aparna to a godown. And the rest of story is a game of expected trivia between Faahad and Roshan Mathews(Sid) in act of survival.

Inshort the film is "Survivor series" remade in the length of a movie. Roshan Mathews gave a good performance impacting his role and the plot of the film but the rest of the Cast are merely puppets and address flaws in the script itself.

So much metal is one gun... OMG such a treat to watch. Special hats off to the AC/DC screenplay and such a crisp editing and a note to Pawan's direction.. but yet the winner is just one my dear FAHADH ... THE WAY THIS GUY HAS CARRIED THIS CHARACTER.. A big loud applause.. yes it lacks the masala and the ending xould have been a bit more emotional and dramatic.. u know its part of cinema making... but on all other grounds of cinematics its a pure treat to watch... keeps you glued... Aparna and Roshan have done well... i think fahadh is promoting vineeth yet again well done performance... overall a great watch... brilliant performances.. adressing a social issue ... last a big hi to the story telling technique... Awesome Mausam... good job guys.

This movie has got everything right in place but misses the heart of the film... Every thrilling factor introduced in this film with excellent narration and gripping screenplay abruptly ends on a disappointing note... Unlike U-turn this movie has got even better potential with a good underlying message oriented brilliant core concept, but the director's choice of execution turns out as failed opportunity... This movie has got decent amount of twists & turns with non-linear narration to keep the audience engaging, but to end it without giving any proper reasoning is what haunts the audience badly... Fahadh faasil is only one thing which can considered as a positive from the movie, intensity generated through his performance is far better than the real tension in storytelling... Overall: the central idea of the movie deals with hardcore emotions, but unfortunately that is what which lacks and makes it a one time watchable!!

2.25/5.

A feature-length no-smoking PSA. The amount of preachiness and the way everything is connected to the central theme feels so over the top and yet by the end, it feels like the least of all the problems with the film. The visual grammar of the movie is still a decade ago when South Indian films were successfully experimenting with new genres and little technical missteps were forgiven. I haven't seen his previous films but Pawan Kumar clearly has an issue with directing in Malayalam. His lack of knowledge of the language is pretty obvious in the dialogues and the way the actors are directed. Some of the scenes felt like the sketches my friends used to do in college where they don't know what to do with their bodies after the dialogue is said. Even Fahadh couldn't do anything with this stuff but at the same time, Roshan did terrific despite these circumstances where almost everyone else was terrible.

Corporate greed and lack of ethics are not at all just tied to a single industry like the makers may be thinking to make a movie in this way. Most people are also much more intelligent and knowledgeable about the effects of tobacco and related products than the movie gives them credit for even if there would always be a percentage who'd be always ignorant.

There were so many things in the movie that were so forced, so hammy in the movie but the dumbest of them all should be how it showed that none of the employees or board members of a cigarette company smokes because they supposedly know the problems, first-hand. Are these guys serious? That too in a city like Bangalore?

Even though I've only smoked three times in the last three years, I felt like I should have a smoke to recover from this.