Cem Karaca'nin Gözyaslari

The movie is not only about the life of Cem Karaca, one of Turkey's most iconic male voices, particularly in the late 70s and 80s, but also about the socio-political backdrop of that era. During this period, Turkish youth were calling for more democracy and freedom, while facing state oppression and bomb attacks by clandestine groups. In a way, the film serves as a profile of the political climate in Turkey during the 70s and 80s. Cem Karaca, with his distinctive voice and unique style, has always held a special place in people's hearts. His struggle, both in music and politics, has been widely admired and respected. The direction is skillful, and the cast is outstanding. The performances of Ismail Hacioglu, Fikret Kuskan, and Yasemin Yalcin are exceptional, and the screenplay is well-balanced. I highly recommend this movie.

Review Summary "Cem Karaca'nin Gözyaslari" attempts to depict the life of Turkish rock star Cem Karaca, but falls short due to historical inaccuracies and a superficial narrative. Key relationships and parts of Karaca's life, like his time in Germany and connections with other musicians, are omitted. Significant events and figures, including his musical career and close friends, are inadequately portrayed. The film's failure to include the song "Resimdeki Gözyaslari," which inspired its title, symbolizes its overall lack of depth and authenticity in capturing Karaca's legacy.

--- "Cem Karaca'nin Gözyaslari" is a biographical film attempting to chronicle a portion of the life of Cem Karaca, a legendary figure in Anatolian rock music, covering the years from the 1950s to 1988. However, it falls short due to a series of historical inaccuracies and superficial assessments of significant moments and relationships.

One of the most striking inaccuracies is its portrayal of Karaca's relationship with his father, also an artist. The film depicts their relationship as fraught with tension, a dramatic exaggeration that does not align with reality. This misrepresentation distorts Karaca's personal history and undermines the film's credibility.

The film also fails in accurately representing Karaca's educational background. Contrary to its portrayal, Karaca did not complete his education. This mistake is surprising, especially considering the involvement of Karaca's son, Emrah Karaca, as a consultant, and raises questions about the attention to detail in the film's production.

Karaca's significant musical journey is hastily narrated. The film includes only a few concert scenes and neglects to explore the depth and evolution of his music career. The narrative around the band Apaslar and its members is oversimplified, and important musician friends who played significant roles in Karaca's life are almost entirely absent, with only a few being relegated to minor roles; like Cahit Berkay and Seyhan Karabay.

The film's depiction of Karaca's exile in Germany is another major flaw. It simplifies this complex period by ignoring his active participation in the music scene, his efforts to address the problems faced by the Turkish diaspora, and his music, concert and theatrical works with the Die Kanaken group. This period was crucial in Karaca's life, and the film's failure to delve into these aspects represents a significant missed opportunity.

Furthermore, the film overlooks key figures in Karaca's life. Relationships with his mother Toto Karaca, his close musician friend Baris Manço, and his partner Meral in Germany are completely ignored. The film also fails to show the dissolution of his previous marriage. These parts are entirely skipped, possibly intentionally omitted by his son Emrah or the mother of his son, i don't know.

One of the most disappointing aspects of the film is its failure to include "Resimdeki Gözyaslari," the song that inspired its title. This omission highlights the film's overall superficial approach and its inadequacy in capturing the essence of Karaca's musical legacy.

"Cem Karaca'nin Gözyaslari" is riddled with inaccuracies and lacks the depth necessary to introduce Karaca's impact to new audiences or satisfy existing fans. The film's attempt to portray this Turkish rock legend is undermined by an incomplete story, poor makeup, and lacking cause-and-effect reasoning, failing to authentically depict a figure of such cultural significance. Unfortunately, the film misses the mark in truly honoring Cem Karaca's legacy, leaving much of the richness and complexity of his life unexplored.

A must-see movie. If you are curious about the 80 years of fascism and dictatorship in Turkiye and want to see a real dictatorship, you should definitely watch it. The film was made true to reality. The actors are very good. The period is also quite realistic.

Even the actor's speaking voice was so similar to Cem Karaca's own voice that it was impossible not to be impressed. This time we sang along to his songs while crying. The one-to-one correspondence between his real life and the lyrics was so touching.

Naturally it would be impossible to go into all the details of this profound artist's life, whose life was so full, even for a two-hour movie. This movie focuses on what he suffered under a fascist system, and other movies that focus on his other aspects could very well be made.

We would like the film to have a sequel so that it lasts until his death. Many thanks to everyone who contributed.

Frankly, as a metalhead and music lover, I have rarely listened to Anatolian rock. One of these rock legends is Cem Karaca. I remember Cem Karaca as he is a very cool and good voiced singer. I liked the movie and enjoyed it. It was a movie that was sometimes funny, sometimes serious, and sometimes dramatic. After reading about Cem Karaca after the movie, I learned that many things were not explained. Is this bad ? Of course. Cem Karaca grew up in an artist family. Moreover, they were not poor. That's why I appreciated that it wasn't explained since childhood. I also found it successful in terms of costumes, make-up and locations. The acting was also very good. I think the actors who played Cem Karaca's wives did not do a good job. Although Fikret Kuskan and Yasemin Yalçin overacted a little, they were generally very good. Ismail Hacioglu acted really well. He did a very successful performance, whether in terms of voice, speaking style or singing. He sang the songs of the movie himself, bravo! Finally, although I was a little annoyed that it didn't explain many things, it was still not a bad movie. At least we listened to Cem Karaca songs. Ismail Hacioglu's work was really good.

Watching a film that so profoundly captures the life and music of Cem Karaca was an extraordinary experience. The film brilliantly reflects Karaca's sensitivity to social issues and the messages he embedded in his music. Witnessing Karaca's life, struggles, disappointments, and passions takes the audience back to 1970s Turkey, evoking the turbulent spirit of that era. The music within the film breathes new life into Karaca's iconic works while shedding light on the political and social turmoil of the time. This film is an unforgettable piece for anyone who wants to understand and rediscover Cem Karaca.