VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,6/10
2671
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.Dopo la morte del nonno, un uomo viaggia con la moglie e i figli nella sua città natale, dove ne deriva il caos con i suoi parenti per l'eredità.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 14 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Each character in the movie is a symbol, an avatar of the many aspects of Mexico and it's people.
It feels like a dream, like a nightmare.
It uses cartoonish characters to make a point.
I don't think foreign audiences would be able to enjoy this movie as the language used and the symbols will be lost in translation.
Mexicans on the other hand will understand even tiny cameos of things and people in the movie.
This is not a subtle movie in any terms. Its very much in your face and it's better understood as satire.
I would like the director to make a movie about southeast Mexico, with actors from the area.
It feels like a dream, like a nightmare.
It uses cartoonish characters to make a point.
I don't think foreign audiences would be able to enjoy this movie as the language used and the symbols will be lost in translation.
Mexicans on the other hand will understand even tiny cameos of things and people in the movie.
This is not a subtle movie in any terms. Its very much in your face and it's better understood as satire.
I would like the director to make a movie about southeast Mexico, with actors from the area.
This is a 3+ hour "comedy". I don't have any idea how something like this could happen from a studio like Sony. There is no way to make a comedy funny and fun that is that long.
The worst part, is that most of that runtime could have been easily trimmed. The first hour is wasted in presenting characters and situations that have not much importance later on.
So, the story is very basic. A city man goes back to his childhood town for his grandfather's funeral and reading of his testament. In the will, his grandfather leaves all his valuable assets to him, to the chagrin of his very big family. This is the set up of the movie, this is where the story begins. This moments happens 1 hour 30 minutes into the movie (I know, because I was checking my watch constantly 30 minutes in).
The rest of the movie you have seen in countless others like Greedy (1994), where all relatives fight each other to get what they think is their fair share.
It could have been a fun silly comedy had it just focused on the funny bits, but it somehow gets lost in super long sequences and presenting dozens of characters that do nothing but just being presented.
A movie to avoid, for sure. But maybe we might eventually get the "Non Director's Cut", that puts this at 90 minutes, and maybe that would be a watchable funny movie.
The worst part, is that most of that runtime could have been easily trimmed. The first hour is wasted in presenting characters and situations that have not much importance later on.
So, the story is very basic. A city man goes back to his childhood town for his grandfather's funeral and reading of his testament. In the will, his grandfather leaves all his valuable assets to him, to the chagrin of his very big family. This is the set up of the movie, this is where the story begins. This moments happens 1 hour 30 minutes into the movie (I know, because I was checking my watch constantly 30 minutes in).
The rest of the movie you have seen in countless others like Greedy (1994), where all relatives fight each other to get what they think is their fair share.
It could have been a fun silly comedy had it just focused on the funny bits, but it somehow gets lost in super long sequences and presenting dozens of characters that do nothing but just being presented.
A movie to avoid, for sure. But maybe we might eventually get the "Non Director's Cut", that puts this at 90 minutes, and maybe that would be a watchable funny movie.
Luis Estrada is a mexican mastermind. In his own words "This is his most ambitious movie", why the mixed reactions then?
One of his most forgotten works and unfairly underrated movie is A Wonderful World. The movie ends in a pretty dark and depressive way, but there's a message inside the story: Because of the poor can't beat the rich, the poor will "kill" the middle class. Just take this in consideration, this is not a regular mexican movie maker, is a powerful message here.
At Que Viva Mexico! Everything, I repeat: EVERYTHING has a meaning, every character represents something alive at this point in the mexican culture. I was looking for a fair review and I found nothing. The mariachis entrance was mistaken as a stupid, senseless and repetitive joke, is not. Here in Mexico the government offers free concerts of top mexican artists. The reference is not obvious, you need to know the director, his previous movies and the current situation of multiple crisis in Mexico.
The movie is NOT an attack to the government, as the previous Estrada movies. This one is against all the people, at different status, condition, health, age, sexual preference, ambitions, intelligence, kindness, loyalty and much more.
One of his most forgotten works and unfairly underrated movie is A Wonderful World. The movie ends in a pretty dark and depressive way, but there's a message inside the story: Because of the poor can't beat the rich, the poor will "kill" the middle class. Just take this in consideration, this is not a regular mexican movie maker, is a powerful message here.
At Que Viva Mexico! Everything, I repeat: EVERYTHING has a meaning, every character represents something alive at this point in the mexican culture. I was looking for a fair review and I found nothing. The mariachis entrance was mistaken as a stupid, senseless and repetitive joke, is not. Here in Mexico the government offers free concerts of top mexican artists. The reference is not obvious, you need to know the director, his previous movies and the current situation of multiple crisis in Mexico.
The movie is NOT an attack to the government, as the previous Estrada movies. This one is against all the people, at different status, condition, health, age, sexual preference, ambitions, intelligence, kindness, loyalty and much more.
Avoid watching this movie or you will suffer it twice: it's not just bad, it's long. Nothing more to say, avoid it like the plague.
It's a movie with jokes with no punchline, which leverages stereotype after stereotype to try (and fail) to make a half decent joke. The storyline Is repetivie with tons of divergent points that go nowhere and contribute nothing to the plot.
Characters are one dimensional, acting is passable at best, and many of them are just fluff that have tons of screen time but don't contribute to the storyline.
Camera shots and framing is boring, no nice landscapes and no interesting camera movements.
It's a movie with jokes with no punchline, which leverages stereotype after stereotype to try (and fail) to make a half decent joke. The storyline Is repetivie with tons of divergent points that go nowhere and contribute nothing to the plot.
Characters are one dimensional, acting is passable at best, and many of them are just fluff that have tons of screen time but don't contribute to the storyline.
Camera shots and framing is boring, no nice landscapes and no interesting camera movements.
The movie is a satire of the current discourse of mexican president who talks about fighting corruption and helping the poor people It won't attack the discourse, instead it will show you the real Mexico so you can judge if the discourse is true or not just as with other Luis Estrada movies.
The actors are second to none, Damian Alcazar portraying several characters displays why he is the current best mexican actor. While I was doubtful about Herrera and de la Reguera, now I understand they hired them because they portray a rich family, hence they are well suited for the role.
Great movie, the mexican president tried to censor the movie, and now it is using bots to give bad reviews.
The actors are second to none, Damian Alcazar portraying several characters displays why he is the current best mexican actor. While I was doubtful about Herrera and de la Reguera, now I understand they hired them because they portray a rich family, hence they are well suited for the role.
Great movie, the mexican president tried to censor the movie, and now it is using bots to give bad reviews.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLupita mentions she's from San Pedro de los Saguaros, the same town in which "la legge di Erode (1999)" is set.
- ConnessioniReferences Los tres huastecos (1948)
- Colonne sonoreLas golondrinas
Performed by Brayan Martínez, Francisco Sánchez, Héctor Covarrubias, Iván Blanco, Martín de Jesús Saucedo, Juan Pablo Aguilera, Lorenzo Saucedo, Cristino Romo and Mauricio Hernández
Courtesy of Bandidos Films
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is ¡Que viva México!?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 161.222 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 79.718 USD
- 26 mar 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.218.942 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione3 ore 11 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.0 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for ¡Que viva México! (2023)?
Rispondi