[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Sherlock
S3.E1
Tutti gli episodiTutto
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
IMDbPro

The Empty Hearse

  • L’episodio è andato in onda il 1 gen 2014
  • TV-PG
  • 1h 28min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
8,8/10
33.032
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Martin Freeman and Benedict Cumberbatch in Sherlock (2010)
CrimineDrammaMisteroThriller

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaMycroft calls Sherlock back to London to investigate an underground terrorist organization.Mycroft calls Sherlock back to London to investigate an underground terrorist organization.Mycroft calls Sherlock back to London to investigate an underground terrorist organization.

  • Regia
    • Jeremy Lovering
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Mark Gatiss
    • Steven Moffat
    • Arthur Conan Doyle
  • Star
    • Benedict Cumberbatch
    • Martin Freeman
    • Una Stubbs
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    8,8/10
    33.032
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Jeremy Lovering
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mark Gatiss
      • Steven Moffat
      • Arthur Conan Doyle
    • Star
      • Benedict Cumberbatch
      • Martin Freeman
      • Una Stubbs
    • 49Recensioni degli utenti
    • 42Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 1 candidatura in totale

    Foto63

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 58
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali35

    Modifica
    Benedict Cumberbatch
    Benedict Cumberbatch
    • Sherlock Holmes
    Martin Freeman
    Martin Freeman
    • Dr. John Watson
    Una Stubbs
    Una Stubbs
    • Mrs. Hudson
    Rupert Graves
    Rupert Graves
    • DI Lestrade
    Mark Gatiss
    Mark Gatiss
    • Mycroft Holmes
    Andrew Scott
    Andrew Scott
    • Jim Moriarty
    Louise Brealey
    Louise Brealey
    • Molly Hooper
    Amanda Abbington
    Amanda Abbington
    • Mary Morstan
    Jonathan Aris
    Jonathan Aris
    • Anderson
    David Fynn
    David Fynn
    • Howard Shilcott
    Sharon Rooney
    Sharon Rooney
    • Laura
    Tomi May
    Tomi May
    • Torturer
    Rick Warden
    Rick Warden
    • Bonfire Dad
    Trixiebell Harrowell
    • Zoe
    • (as Trixiebelle Harrowell)
    Lace Akpojaro
    • Reporter 1
    Jim Conway
    • Reporter 2
    Nicole Arumugam
    • Reporter 3
    David Gant
    David Gant
    • Mr. Szikora
    • Regia
      • Jeremy Lovering
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Mark Gatiss
      • Steven Moffat
      • Arthur Conan Doyle
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti49

    8,833K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    10jgrents

    An awaited and superb relaunch from Gatiss and Moffat!

    With the last seasons being such a great spectacle to witness, the expectations were held high by all – would the new season's starter be able to repeat the success of the last season starter? Well, it definitely matched up to it in a way, but was always to be a slightly different episode, as the main events of the episode were be the explanation of how Sherlock's still alive, rather than planting a new villain story and also offer a deep mystery to solve in the first episode. All this would not fit into 90 minutes, would the editors provide maximum attention and detail to everything, it's going to be too intense and too much mystery would make the episode a little too twisty would not provide enough integrity - it would be all around the place. So the balance had to be found between all of these aspects and boy, wasn't that balance found! All of it was wrapped up into a perfect sequence of events that rolled open in front of our eyes and none of the sequences dominated the others... too much... and hence created an episode with excellent integrity. The acting and especially the visuals were always to be spot on, there is no other option with Sherlock. I can't compare it to Scandal in Belgravia and say its better, since they are not really comparable, as in Scandal of Belgravia, the directors needed about 5 minutes to close all the loose ends from the previous season and start another great mystery. This one needed a lot more of it and yet still made a great episode. 9.5 out of 10.
    9Bored_Dragon

    Underrated

    My favorite episode so far. It's badly bashed online because it really has its flaws. The main argument is that this episode is more of a parody to Sherlock than it is new Sherlock story. The fact is that this episode does not bring new complicated crime and Sherlock's genius solution, and to a certain extent I can understand the disappointment of those who waited two years for this episode. But I, who waited for it just a few minutes, really cannot recall last time I had so much fun. It may be bad from the crime/mystery genre point of view, but it's not written in the stone that every episode must follow that pattern. It's premium entertainment and I am thrilled.

    9/10

    However, I have one objection. It is not a big deal and most of the audience won't even notice it, because it is obvious only to former Yugoslavian audience and Russians, but it needlessly undermines the quality of this awesome show. I will quote Bosnian guy who presented this issue par excellence:

    "Besides Serbs always being the bad guys, torturing someone when they have nothing else to do, how come they wear Russian parade uniforms and talk their Serbian like a parrot with Aerosinusitis, which is hardly intelligible. I know that Mycroft had few hours to learn Serbian, but the other Serbian guy speaks his mother tongue like a text-to-speech software. It seems that using google translate instead of human keeps production costs low... just as the quality of it."
    10vaibhavkumar567

    A Marvelous Return of the great detective

    2 years is a pretty long time to wait for something so excellent.Being a big fan of the source material,I've followed this show from the beginning and this episode lived up to our expectations..the wait was worth it!We finally got an explanation to the riddle which had been bugging our minds so long.

    Is there something better than Sherlock and Moriarty about to make out, and Sherlock's parents, and Sherlock's scarf, and Sherlock kissing Molly, and John repeatedly attacking Sherlock, and Anderson's first name?I think not. This was by far one of the best episode of this show and provided a full dose of spectacular performances by Benedict and Freeman with a script full of amazing wit,whizz and humour.Also the way Sherlock explains the fall is stunning and it opened with a breathtaking sequence. And hats off to the creators for such an excellent episode. It deserves a 10/10.
    stillworkingfortheknife

    Many botched returns

    If you choose to end a series of your internationally worshipped TV programme with its protagonist jumping to what looks to be ineluctable decease, orchestrate it in a way that contracts the credible possibilities to no more than a dozen, and then take a two-year hiatus to let innumerable amounts of blogs and websites speculate about how that character isn't yet pushing up daisies after all, you're going to have quite a bit explaining to do once you return. Sherlock's creators, Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat, were aware of that and did the best thing they could under such circumstances: choosing one of these much contemplated possibilities, while also factoring in that a good deal of the fans of their product will ten to one be disappointed with their decision.

    The slightly insane former police officer Philip Anderson is the embodiment of all the uploaders of conjecturing YouTube videos, essayists of circumstantial analyses of "The Reichenbach Fall", and participants in online forums that scrutinise every shot from Sherlock's pilot onwards; and as Sherlock spells his complex scheme out to him, Anderson's reactions precisely mirror those of some of the programme's fandom. Gatiss and Moffat were bright enough to accept that, no matter what they did, they couldn't really confound their audience anymore, nor could they leave the mystery open without avoiding the loss of their entire viewership, bar the critics earning their living for watching their work. Hence, they opted to resolve their conundrum in a rather ordinary manner, while counterbalancing it with acknowledging just that – which, to my mind, is as audacious as it is clever.

    However, if they've thought that a simple »We know it isn't perfect.« could stop me from picking holes in the explanation for Sherlock's survival, I feel obliged to quote Dr Cox for a second: »Good God in heaven, Newbie. There are just so very many ways for me to say this to you: Never. Not in a million years. Absolutely not. No way, José. No chance, Lance. Njet. Negatory. Mm-mm. Nuh-uh. Uh-uh. And of course, my own personal favourite of all time, man falling off of a cliff: Noooooooooo!«

    Sorry about that. If you've understandably had enough of all the inspection that has been surrounding Sherlock ever since that one jump, I suggest skipping the rest of this paragraph, but to account for my merely semi-enthusiastic rating for this episode, here be the nit- picking: if Mycroft was able to 'get to' the sniper aiming at John, why couldn't he do that with the ones responsible for Mrs Hudson and Lestrade and thereby render all the fuss about Sherlock's fake suicide utterly useless? Did the Holmes brothers actually risk John finding out everything about their manoeuvre if he just were to move his fundament for a few metres or would have been able to elude the assailant on a bicycle? And last, though really quite the opposite of least: a doppelgänger? The only plot device lazier than that would be Sherlock genuinely dying, but a divinity stepping in to revive him for the reason of him 'having not yet attained his true mission'.

    Just like writing wit clashes with the messy reasons for Sherlock's survival, "The Empty Hearse" as a whole is comprised of nothing but ups and downs. The introduction of Mary as a human and amiable character stands in sharp contrast to John's unduly aggressive response to the apparent resurrection of his best friend. Furthermore, the ensuing alliance of Sherlock and Molly is propelled by a lovely chemistry between the two of them, as the latter has finally moved on from Sherlock at least a bit, but all of that is at odds with a Hollywoodised and clichéd rescue sequence that slackly reunites Sherlock's two main characters for the last third of the episode. There, an enjoyable if not particularly noteworthy case is solved quite logically after both John and the audience were initially put on the wrong track (no pun intended), though the scene is roughly interrupted for the required clarification of Sherlock's Reichenbach fall, which screenwriter Mark Gatiss ostensibly couldn't fit anywhere else.

    Charles Augustus Magnussen, the primary antagonist in this series, who here makes his first appearance in an intriguingly chilling final scene, would be better off rewatching the footage of Sherlock's previous episodes instead of this one's.

    My detective scribblings: • The episode tackles this only marginally, but how did the investigators ascertain that Moriarty was lying about Sherlock? And since they did, Moriarty's plan was entirely non-effective, since Sherlock not only didn't die, but wasn't disgraced either. • As was demonstrated in the previous two series, John has had plenty of girlfriends during his time at 221B Baker Street, many of whom he brought there with him. So, sorry, but that running gag about him being gay just doesn't work for Mrs Hudson. • Cinematographer Steve Lawes did a phenomenal job at deceiving the viewers into believing that Mycroft and Sherlock are playing chess in a scene that is also exquisitely written and acted. In fact, now that I've started thinking about it, I'm fairly sure that this is the best scene in "The Empty Hearse". • »I like trains.« - Is that a cameo from the creator of asdf movie? • Oh, a character mistaking an eccentric-looking character for another character in disguise. This is the very first time I've seen this! • I've already touched on Gatiss and Moffat's ingenuity at playing with expectations in this episode, and a prime case in point for that would be John getting jabbed with the needle of a syringe during his abduction in a brilliant nod to one of the theories concerning "The Reichenbach Fall". • Sherlock pressing his hands to his face when in deep thought is frankly fatuous. And the same goes for his atypical exclaiming of 'Oh!' after having found a solution.
    7Sleepin_Dragon

    It's good, but it is a bit smug

    I waited keenly to see the conclusion of the Reichenbach fall, and we get the Empty Hearse.

    I enjoyed it as it continues to be bursting with exuberance, it's fun and wacky, but it is not the best, the plot is a bit on the thin side, and it just feels overly self satisfied. I could imagine Mark Gatiss and Steven Moffat laughing maniacally and patting each other on the back during its creation.

    It feels a little like we have a 15 minuted story with 75 minutes explaining Sherlock's bizarre survival, the on/off switch has been slammed many times, I need not add to that, it just seems a wee bit lazy.

    There are great points though, some of the imaginings of Sherlocks death are fun, his actual parents are brilliant, the bonfire scene was superbly done, and Louise Brealey continues to shine brightly as Molly.

    It delivers largely, but the bar has been set so high more was expected, 7/10

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Sherlock and Mycroft's parents are played by Benedict Cumberbatch's real-life parents, Wanda Ventham and Timothy Carlton.
    • Blooper
      Sherlock goes to great lengths to examine the skeleton, supposedly of Jack the Ripper in the hidden room. However, Sherlock should have spotted it was a fake immediately as the skeleton was in a sitting position, fully articulated. Without any ligature tissue to support the bones, the skeleton would be a pile of bones on the chair and floor. Molly, as a doctor, should also have known this.
    • Citazioni

      Dr. John Watson: Well, I've got some news.

      Mrs. Hudson: Oh, God, is it serious?

      Dr. John Watson: What? No, no I'm not ill. I've, uh, well I'm... moving on.

      Mrs. Hudson: You're emigrating?

      Dr. John Watson: Nope. Uh, no, I've, uh... I have met someone.

      Mrs. Hudson: Oh! Ah, lovely.

      Dr. John Watson: Yeah. We're getting married. Well, I'm going to ask, anyway.

      Mrs. Hudson: So soon after Sherlock?

      Dr. John Watson: Hmm, well, yes.

      Mrs. Hudson: What's his name?

      Dr. John Watson: [sighs] It's a woman.

      Mrs. Hudson: A woman?

      Dr. John Watson: Yes, of course it's a woman.

      Mrs. Hudson: [laughs quietly] You really have moved on, haven't you?

      Dr. John Watson: Mrs. Hudson, how many times?... Sherlock was not my boyfriend.

      Mrs. Hudson: Live and let live, that's my motto.

      Dr. John Watson: Listen to me. *I am not gay*!

    • Curiosità sui crediti
      During the credits, individual letters are coloured red. Together they spell Weng Chiang.
    • Connessioni
      Featured in The Big Fat Quiz of the Year (2014)
    • Colonne sonore
      ¿Dónde Estás, Yolanda?
      (uncredited)

      Written by Pink Martini

      Performed by Pink Martini

      [Played when John and Mary dine together]

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 1 gennaio 2014 (Regno Unito)
    • Paese di origine
      • Regno Unito
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Aldwych Underground Railway Station, Surrey Street, Aldwych, Westminster, Greater London, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(Used to depict the disused Sumatra Road station beneath Westminster Palace)
    • Azienda produttrice
      • Hartswood Films
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 28min(88 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Proporzioni
      • 16:9 HD

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.