Se solo fossi un orso

In a one-room ger in the Mongolian capital, Ulaanbaatar, lives lanky teenager Ulzii; his widowed, alcoholic mother; and his three siblings. His mother is unable to earn enough to feed all her children and it falls to Ulzii to supplement the family income by doing odd-jobs - unloading a van or delivering meat, for example. But he has a special, intuitive talent for physics, and an inspirational schoolteacher suggests he enter the national physics competition (yes, such things exist - introducing the film at the 2023 London Film Festival, editor Alexandra Strauss explained that although this film is a work of fiction, it is based on a documentary). If Ulzii wins, he will get a scholarship. But with all of his family responsibilities, can he put in the time required for study?

For Western audiences, a film from Mongolia is a rare treat. As well as the central plotline, the film also provides a look at modern Mongolia, where ancient traditions meld with today's way of life: in one scene Ulzii is sent to visit his aunt in her modern, high-rise flat in order to place his big toe in his infant nephew's mouth - this, apparently, is a sure-fire way to cure a facial rash. As the film progresses (writer/director Zoljargal Purevdash cleverly marking the passage of time by every so often changing Ulzii's hairstyle) we see Mongolian teenagers acting like teenagers anywhere: play-fighting, playing sports, lusting after a pair of stylish trainers.

The adventures of a physics student does not sound like a promising subject for a film and it is interesting to speculate whether this film would have worked if it were set in the UK or US; I suspect not. But set in a country that rarely features in Western entertainment, it works a treat.

As I say, brilliant, but.... It is maybe part of the plot to leave us wondering?

Is it sufficiently well constructed to feel good as you leave the cinema?

It won't sell Mongolia as a holiday destination, but it will make you wonder whether a country with such inequality, needs a movie like this?

A sad story beautifully illustrated, portrayed, evaluated, constructed and made.

I know nothing about the makers of the film, but they themselves know a lot about making a film, even if you feel uncomfortable, part of the beauty?

Makes you want see more, about Mongolia, its people, its culture, its future and its film industry.

What I do know is that Chinese exploitants have ruined probably their best option to develope their economy by producing probably the finest Cashmere clothing. By creating so many goats to produce the wool that the land is laid bare.

Probably, European and other businessmen required the Chinese to ruin the commercial future?

Really very good. Poignant socio-economic portrait of city life in modern Mongolia, more particularly of poor people who wish to get by by acquiring a good education, among other things. The harsh and cruel side often associated with extreme poverty, hard to receive, is relevant, effective and striking. We also see all the resilience, mutual aid and generosity that human beings can demonstrate. The point presented can be transposed almost anywhere in the world, even in so-called rich countries. Excellent soundtrack to support the story. The recurring musical theme is very beautiful and moving. However, at the beginning of the film, there is an error in the translation of a mathematical term, in the subtitles, surely coming from the fact that the translation was done from Mongolian to English, then to French (confusion between ''integrals'' and ''integers'' which gives ''integers'' in the translation rather than the correct term ''integrals''). A relatively open ending, as is customary in films from the Orient. This work presents us with beautiful life lessons. Good duration.

I saw this film today at the Braunschweig International Film Festival and I was deeply moved.

The story is about the self chosen responsibility of a boy for his two younger siblings because their widowed mother could not feed them. When he realized that her mother wants to move them back to the countryside, he spoke up for himself and the two younger siblings because he saw the importance of going to school.

Left alone by the mother, he is torn between earning money, going to school and caring for his younger siblings. The film shows the daily difficulties surviving in a yurt even when there is little heat and little to eat. A wonderful film with excellent characters.

Cinematography decent, phasing great, story not half bad. Use of Mise-en scene and Chekhov's gun are non existent. Things just tend to happen. Much of the dramatic aspects are just told or has no impact, obviously because it was never built upon. Some concepts are hard for foreign audience to understand. To the director and writer of this film: SHOW NOT TELL!

Since it's director's first feature film it's decent better than what's coming out today in Mongolian film industry. But it's not great achievement or whatever most people say it is. Honestly it would be shameful if this film was ever to be applied to Academic awards.