VALUTAZIONE IMDb
2,8/10
1111
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Decenni fa, l'URSS ha sviluppato squali immortali e li ha lanciati sulla luna. Oggi, una squadra di astronauti americani sopporterà la battaglia della loro vita.Decenni fa, l'URSS ha sviluppato squali immortali e li ha lanciati sulla luna. Oggi, una squadra di astronauti americani sopporterà la battaglia della loro vita.Decenni fa, l'URSS ha sviluppato squali immortali e li ha lanciati sulla luna. Oggi, una squadra di astronauti americani sopporterà la battaglia della loro vita.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Natasha Goubskaya
- Tzarina
- (voce)
Yelena Savranskaya
- Scar
- (voce)
- …
Recensioni in evidenza
I've seen better filmmaking from a fifth-grade drama class - in the 1980's. This nonsense had two writers and two directors - of which has to be the worst directed film I've ever seen. Even worse, both directors have a combined -get this- 302 Visual Effects credits on their resume! The green screen and CGI effects seemed like they were just invented and experimented in this film. The bonus (and my recommendation for viewing this film) is that we all watched this under the influence of alcoholic beverages and recreational pharmaceuticals - strictly for medicinal purposes of course, and we couldn't stop laughing at how bad this was. This may have been less painful if the 88 min runtime was cut down to around 20 mins. There really was nothing redeeming about this poor excuse of an action sci-fi horror film. Even on a $75 dollar budget, I could make a better film. I mean Sharknado was better, so what does that tell you. But because of the many laugh out loud moments we had, especially during the slow-mo fake gravity moon walks, I'm still giving this nonsense a very generous 3/10.
I caught this on TUBI last night and frankly this is one of the worst movies that I have ever viewed. Frankly life is too short to waste your time on this disaster.
1. Acting ranges from barely adequate to poor 2. CGI looks like it was designed on a Pentium 3 or Apple Power PC (almost twenty years old).
3. The storyline is so ridiculous and takes place on the far side of the moon which is perpetually dark...except in this movie.
4. The science behind this "money laundering" exercise was obviously based on pre-Gallileo science.
The only redeeming feature of this trainwreck was the ending which points to no sequels. Thank the gods and pass the bottle!
Believe me, life is too short to waste your time on this insult to your intelligence. Alternatively, if you just want a good laugh then this movie maybe for you.
1. Acting ranges from barely adequate to poor 2. CGI looks like it was designed on a Pentium 3 or Apple Power PC (almost twenty years old).
3. The storyline is so ridiculous and takes place on the far side of the moon which is perpetually dark...except in this movie.
4. The science behind this "money laundering" exercise was obviously based on pre-Gallileo science.
The only redeeming feature of this trainwreck was the ending which points to no sequels. Thank the gods and pass the bottle!
Believe me, life is too short to waste your time on this insult to your intelligence. Alternatively, if you just want a good laugh then this movie maybe for you.
I had to give this 'scary' sci-fi film a third star simply because it gave me plenty of laughs. Outside of that, this film is about as far from making sense as the earth is from the moon. But oh well, I guess they decided they had to pick somewhere new to give us a shark themed movie. Giggle, giggle!
Most scientifically accurate movie about sharks on the moon ever made!! Can't wait for the sequel next week cuz that's how effort they put into the production. Too bad Finn wasn't there to help.
This was bad. When the synopsis popped up on my guide, I was excited by the prospect of seeing the best bad movie ever. It started out with a lot of promise - this one was going to give Sharknado a run for its money. By about halfway it had degenerated into Yongary bad. It's not Ulli Lommel-level atrocious, but it did leave a pretty fantastic concept circling the drain. It's a solid 2/10. I added a star because the idea was so awesome and it did start out with promise. I could have subtracted that star for being a disappointment, but it is better than that...
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe title "Shark Side of the Moon" is a playful take on the "Dark Side of the Moon" but with russian mutant sharks, just as the title suggests. 10/10 movie
- ConnessioniReferenced in Die schlechtesten Filme aller Zeiten: Piranha Sharks (2023)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Shark Side of the Moon?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- El lado tiburón de la Luna
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 28 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Shark Side of the Moon (2022) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi