The Cohasset Snuff Film

There is so much I can say regarding how awesomely, amazingly awful this film is. But sadly I cannot. The only thing that that needs to be mentioned is how noteworthingly terrible the lead is. He is laughably bad as an actor and sank this Titanic of a motion picture within one line of his dialogue. This film was mostly this goofy boy trying WAY to much to be the typical psycho but does it in such a slapstick way. When he attacks the jogger he says "this is a low budget film". That is the truth.

This movie is sensational! The view of perspective is highly unique combined with an unpredictable storyline kept me on the edge of my seat. The way this picture is filmed truly brings out an airy feeling throughout. There were no dull moments; each scene was gripping and I found myself attempting to out think the main character on his next move. Being from a small rural town I was connected and understood the "local folk" feel of the film. The story is realistic and can happen anywhere also there is a personal touch that brings you into the realm of Cohasset, Massachusetts. The Cohasset Snuff Film is doused with a touch of twisted humor that was truly enjoyable. I even thought of this film after a few days of watching and the story was still in my thoughts.

"The Cohasset Snuff Film" purports to be found footage of a high school student's killing spree in the town of Cohasset, Massachusetts in the form of vlogs left by 17-year-old Colin Mason, and his filmed murders. The filmmakers claim that we're seeing actual murder footage in this "documentary" and, to further add to the illusion of realism, people featured in the film are credited as themselves. It's clear, while watching the interviews (with supposed psychologists, a priest, family members, fellow students of the victims, and so on) that these are actors, or people TRYING to act. It's certainly possible, and even plausible so it wouldn't spoil the illusion of a "real" documentary, that unknown amateurs were brought on for the roles. But it's evident that these were individuals reciting lines, attempting to emote, etc. I think the worst offender was "Colin Mason" himself, in his many monologues. I get where the movie was coming from, or at least what it was trying to say -- about how troubled kids are often ignored until it's too late -- but unfortunately for us, the audience, we basically learn nothing about Colin that would turn him into a killer. Which I suppose is why it was decided to just make him a serial killer instead?

And if you were drawn in by the box art, which is fairly gory, the film itself is pretty tame in comparison. There's a lot more nudity than bloodshed, which again would make you wonder why a free streaming service like Plex would have a movie that contains real murders, and the nudity of 17-year-old murder victims? I don't think that would be a thing.

One suspension of disbelief that didn't work for me is the claim that the entire town, after finding out that Colin had uploaded his murder footage to various torrent sites, decided to take action to scrub the footage off the Internet (good luck with that) and then basically erase the murders from existence. The police are going to cooperate, and risk jail themselves down the road? The town government? One woman FROM the town government is interviewed for this documentary, admitting to her crime! Surely the state's attorney general might have some questions upon being notified that in the aftermath of a serial killer operating in a small town, the police and local government just decided to destroy evidence and not notify anyone that it had happened?

For a $50,000 budget, it was an ambitious undertaking that unfortunately didn't do anything new that strained credulity.

I don't really know if I can put into words just how bad this movie is. The acting was horrible. While I think the story had potential, it was executed very poorly.I'm simply surprised the filmmakers were proud enough of this film to release this film.

I've seen a lot of horror films, from mainstream to low budget indie, but I won't call myself an expert. I will say though that if you go into this movie expect a gory, blood gushing slasher, you're not going to get what you are looking for. Perhaps the best way to describe this movie is more psychological thriller with a tinge of horror. This movies doesn't delve too deeply into the gruesome, but rather adheres to the old adage "what you don't see can scare you." It doesn't go for cheap jumps like most of the mainstream horror films do now but rather studies the inner workings of what drives people to commit these crimes through the "found footage" genre. While it may not be in the highest of production values, it does emphasize in the character and story structure which is what is needed in this genre. Take the time to watch this movie, but don't let it M. Night Shyamalan you into expecting what it isn't.