VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,1/10
6601
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua lingua50 abducted women are forced to fight each other using their bare hands.50 abducted women are forced to fight each other using their bare hands.50 abducted women are forced to fight each other using their bare hands.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 2 candidature totali
Chris Schwartz
- Small Worker
- (as C.M. Schwartzy)
Recensioni in evidenza
On the down side a somewhat well worn storyline of people suddenly waking up in some undisclosed secure location and have to fight or kill follow abductees to find freedom. Has been done in many manifestations before. Nothing new here; same cameras with our hidden captor at first known only through their voice. Typical cage fighting - martial arts or whatever one can come up with for fighting. Back story, also done before, of wealthy audience being entertained throughout as inmates fight-for-life. Overacting, bad person roles especially; thus, not too believable. Ending scenes came across as even less believable and therefore viewer engaging.
On the up side, follow up with the slightly similar "The Seasoning House".
On the up side, follow up with the slightly similar "The Seasoning House".
My quick rating - 6,0/10. A different look on the women behind bars story. These women are held captive and forced to fight to the death in an underground "dungeon"? That is what it looked like. Very brutal and quite depressing movie showing the violent side of the fighting coupled with the bonds this women create before they must face the inevitable if they win. They will have to fight each other. Pretty decent acting for the very limited budget. Didn't know who Zoe Bell was before (the main character) but she did a good job. Also to note, a very good ending that may or may not leave the door open for a sequel. Fighting scenes are not for the squemmish but beyond that, nice diamond in the unheard of rough.
Not a bad film. It's different, pretty brutal and bloody so if that's your thing, check it out.
My only complaints about it are that we didn't get enough info on the reasons why. There is a brief explanation but I would've liked elaboration and a better look at who the members of this society really were.
I'm on the fence about the ending. Some will love it. Some will hate it. I just don't know which group I fit into yet.
I say check it out. It's found a place amongst my "So Glad I Gave It A Chance" films.
My only complaints about it are that we didn't get enough info on the reasons why. There is a brief explanation but I would've liked elaboration and a better look at who the members of this society really were.
I'm on the fence about the ending. Some will love it. Some will hate it. I just don't know which group I fit into yet.
I say check it out. It's found a place amongst my "So Glad I Gave It A Chance" films.
It's really too bad the cinematography and editing for the fight scenes is so poor, with a separate shot and close shot for every king and punch. It makes it so much harder to follow the action. Unfortunate, because the actresses are so game for the intense and brutal fights. Both physically and emotionally. They really put their all into it. And they make you feel the despair and anger they're going through. They're what will keep you locked on and trying to keep track of the poor camera work for the fights.
When I read the synopsis in the Fantasia Film Festival program, I was intrigued. Even though the premise was about abducted women, it did not seem like your typical movie about helpless women tortured under the hand of men. It also did not seem like a cliché women on women violence type of movie. It also used words like "empowered" and "different".
And so I went in expecting just that. Something different. I especially went in expecting this movie to make some kind of statement about the way this society views women in general. I actually thought that the organization that abducts the women was a metaphor for the patriarchal system and that the "empowered" women portrayed would eventually break free from that system.
And so when the movie ended, I felt let down. Like somehow, the filmmaker was telling us that no matter how hard we fought, we could not defeat the system.
I was lucky enough to attend a screening after which the director of the movie as well as the principal actress were both there to answer questions from the audience. And so when I pointed that out, the filmmaker became defensive and explained that he did not want to make any kind of political statement whatsoever and that he just wanted to give us an "enjoyable fun movie to watch with lots of fighting." He also made a point to tell me that if it had been men fighting, I wouldn't have made the comment I made.
Exactly. But this movie was about women, strong women, who were imprisoned by a cruel system forcing them to fight one another. It had everything in place to make a strong statement, give us something to reflect upon and do what a good movie should always do: teach us something.
And yet, this movie has no depth and isn't different from any other action movie with fights. To be "different", this movie needed a message beyond "look, chicks fighting and it looks real!".
In the end, the plot of "Raze" falls into the typical normalization of helpless women forced to behave a certain way by an oppressive system passed on from father to son. To me, this is the precise opposite of "empowered".
I'm awfully disappointed.
And so I went in expecting just that. Something different. I especially went in expecting this movie to make some kind of statement about the way this society views women in general. I actually thought that the organization that abducts the women was a metaphor for the patriarchal system and that the "empowered" women portrayed would eventually break free from that system.
And so when the movie ended, I felt let down. Like somehow, the filmmaker was telling us that no matter how hard we fought, we could not defeat the system.
I was lucky enough to attend a screening after which the director of the movie as well as the principal actress were both there to answer questions from the audience. And so when I pointed that out, the filmmaker became defensive and explained that he did not want to make any kind of political statement whatsoever and that he just wanted to give us an "enjoyable fun movie to watch with lots of fighting." He also made a point to tell me that if it had been men fighting, I wouldn't have made the comment I made.
Exactly. But this movie was about women, strong women, who were imprisoned by a cruel system forcing them to fight one another. It had everything in place to make a strong statement, give us something to reflect upon and do what a good movie should always do: teach us something.
And yet, this movie has no depth and isn't different from any other action movie with fights. To be "different", this movie needed a message beyond "look, chicks fighting and it looks real!".
In the end, the plot of "Raze" falls into the typical normalization of helpless women forced to behave a certain way by an oppressive system passed on from father to son. To me, this is the precise opposite of "empowered".
I'm awfully disappointed.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe 19 action sequences in the film were filmed in 30 days.
- ConnessioniReferenced in GirlFight: inVite (2016)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Raze?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 7429 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3453 USD
- 12 gen 2014
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 7429 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 27 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti