VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
8976
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Passione, noia o semplice bisogno di affermazione: quante sono le ragioni alla base del tradimento? Tra sketch irriverenti e bugie davvero originali, il film che racconta l'infedeltà maschil... Leggi tuttoPassione, noia o semplice bisogno di affermazione: quante sono le ragioni alla base del tradimento? Tra sketch irriverenti e bugie davvero originali, il film che racconta l'infedeltà maschile, in tutte le sue forme.Passione, noia o semplice bisogno di affermazione: quante sono le ragioni alla base del tradimento? Tra sketch irriverenti e bugie davvero originali, il film che racconta l'infedeltà maschile, in tutte le sue forme.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
The movie made big waves even before it hit the international cinema screens, because someone leaked the fact that a movie poster got held back because it was inappropriate and would have diminished Jean Dujardins chances of winning the Oscar (or was it just a publicity stunt?). The movie itself might be able to live off that controversy at first, but even after a few "shocking" moments at first, it'll have to stand on its own two feet (pun not intended).
Dujardin and his partner (in crime) here show a real passion for that project. They go places you might expect them to go. But even if only Dujardin is on your radar (the other actor being very famous in France too), it is a lack of emotion for both characters and the triviality of the whole thing, that might make you want to stop watching it. The overall idea was nice and I still kind of like it, but it's anything but special ...
Dujardin and his partner (in crime) here show a real passion for that project. They go places you might expect them to go. But even if only Dujardin is on your radar (the other actor being very famous in France too), it is a lack of emotion for both characters and the triviality of the whole thing, that might make you want to stop watching it. The overall idea was nice and I still kind of like it, but it's anything but special ...
This is not an exceptional film. Its main quality, besides the good acting, is to explore the theme of infidelity in a manner not "socially correct". This is a movie with several skits(7 or 8) some very short, others more substantial. The characters are excessive, lovable, sympathetic or repelling, comic or depressing ...
It is sometimes quite realistic, sometimes more fantastic or surrealistic, but we can find a little bit of ourself in those situations or characters.
The acting is OK, and Dujardin Lellouche are excellent.
A good time to spend, not necessarily with a square, except if you want to help him loosen up.
It is sometimes quite realistic, sometimes more fantastic or surrealistic, but we can find a little bit of ourself in those situations or characters.
The acting is OK, and Dujardin Lellouche are excellent.
A good time to spend, not necessarily with a square, except if you want to help him loosen up.
this film is actually very hollow to portray two sexual driven french guys whose only desire was to fornicate any average pretty woman they encountered any time and any place. they both were married but simply couldn't keep their zippers up. they were night prowlers in all the nightclubs or even in the daytime attending seminars. there were so many unnecessary ugly sexual intercourse scenes that only the wild monkeys would do. the whole movie was trying to categorize itself in the comedy genre but not even one moment you'd have a feeling to smile or laugh. if you think it's drama, then it was too shallow. two guys were prescribed by the screenplay as two attractive males to women, but with these two casting, only the movie by itself could make them attractive to women. they were just average males with average looks, yet the script endowed one of them so popular with women and most of time he could score, while the other usually by passed by most women. this is a very pathetic movie that was so tasteless and boring to the extreme. and i really don't know what made this screenplay to be approved into production. there's no purpose at all to have another pointless movies churned out from the french movie industries. the investors who invested on this shallow movie simply lost more than the movie goers who just wasted a few bucks. a movie you shouldn't go to theater to watch, not even worth renting the DVD.
I must be exactly the right age and marital status to like this show. I didn't think it would be very good but from the very beginning it grabbed my attention and just wouldn't let go. All characters, young and old, married and single were very bondable (is that a word). I enjoyed from beginning to end. Amazon really scored on this one. Of course, had I been a year older or younger, or a year more married or single I might not have liked it so much. So, I'll just count it as a favorite French film of mine, no matter what anyone else thinks.
Humour and vulgarity can be very close to each other. And if you are not very cautious, yuu fall into vulgarity.
This is the problem with this movie. It could have been funny. It could have been enjoyable if the characters were not that extreme in their behaviour.
Dujardin and Lellouche are such good actors. This is just sad.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn Paris, the French advertising regulator ordered provocative billboards be taken down as they were deemed crass and vulgar.
- Curiosità sui creditiThere's a mid-credits scene.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Večernij Urgant: Svetlana Khodchenkova/Basta (2012)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Players?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.854 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 6674 USD
- 6 apr 2014
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 24.629.152 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 49 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Gli infedeli (2012) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi