Feed
- 2022
- 1h 44min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
8548
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice ch... Leggi tuttoUn gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice che viva un'antica strega svedese.Un gruppo di esperti di social media viene assunto per aiutare una vecchia azienda familiare a prosperare. Ma presto si ritrovano bloccati su una minuscola isola in un lago in cui si dice che viva un'antica strega svedese.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Recensioni in evidenza
I liked the content and the plot. Were a few jump scares but the adrenalin wasn't through the roof like I want it to be on a horror movie. For the low budget you seem to have squished every penny which is a good thing. Love the plot twist, wouldn't see that coming at all. The actors were amazing. I love Joel Lützow since before but all of them were great. So all in all , I give the movie a 7 which is because I think it miss a few details. I want to be scared when I walk out of the movie theater which I wasn't. But I look forward so bad to see what you come up with next. And for the producer, such a good work. I praise you.
I really did want to give this movie a honest chance because I like Joakim but it really was terrible.
The character development didn't exist what so ever, for all I care all of them could die and I would've forgotten about them the next scene.
The sound effect were so over the top that I almost thought some I've them were a joke. For example why would you add a jump scare sound to a small drone flying by?
The over all cheapness and lazyness it so apparent that I actually laughed at times. For example when a character almost drowns and. Lies on the bridge, why is her hair completely dry? And in the first scene, you can see the shadow of the Serbian girl when she jumps down in the grass.
The plot was so predictable that I said out loud what was going to happen next and 9/10 I was right.
My final judgement is that this is more of a YouTube video that a movie and it does not belong on the big screen. I prefer Wicca over this.
The character development didn't exist what so ever, for all I care all of them could die and I would've forgotten about them the next scene.
The sound effect were so over the top that I almost thought some I've them were a joke. For example why would you add a jump scare sound to a small drone flying by?
The over all cheapness and lazyness it so apparent that I actually laughed at times. For example when a character almost drowns and. Lies on the bridge, why is her hair completely dry? And in the first scene, you can see the shadow of the Serbian girl when she jumps down in the grass.
The plot was so predictable that I said out loud what was going to happen next and 9/10 I was right.
My final judgement is that this is more of a YouTube video that a movie and it does not belong on the big screen. I prefer Wicca over this.
The concept and storyline in the movie was alright, the acting as well. I also found the balance between jump-scares and overall creepiness good. But after 80% of the movie, the plot took such an awful turn and everything until that point was also suddenly destroyed by this. It got too much and I felt like the creator wanted to cram in every single idea in the last ten minutes, even though it would have been so much better and more creepy if he'd just end beforehand. The characters where also quite stereotypical and there was not a single character development. The dialogue was also boring.
At the other hand, for Joakim Lundell, I think this is a great accomplishment. Even though I'm not too familiar with him, I almost feel proud. And you also have to keep in mind that this was a debut from someone who haven't done film before.
But I still hated this movie and I wouldn't recommend it.
At the other hand, for Joakim Lundell, I think this is a great accomplishment. Even though I'm not too familiar with him, I almost feel proud. And you also have to keep in mind that this was a debut from someone who haven't done film before.
But I still hated this movie and I wouldn't recommend it.
This movie is quite bad. I gave it a 4 (which is probably too high) due to the fact that I actually made it through all the way, albeit close to giving up a few times. Basically, it does nothing right: it's not scary, the story is not original or intriguing; it's very predictable; there are many irrational decisions being made by the characters; the psychology of the characters doesn't feel authentic. Sometimes the scenery was quite good, and the fact that it was so bad made it a little bit charming in a weird way. There might or might not be some talented folks involved in the making of this movie - probably not - but it's likely one of those cases where too many people submitted ideas (taken from other movies) and the actual creator(s) threw too much in there, creating a mess. I don't recommend this to anyone with the slightest ability of critical thinking - it will torture you. However, if you're an oblivious man or woman, this might be just for you.
I have more character development in my turds! This movie was a huge dissapointment, I expected more from Joakim. It passed the first generations bechdel test but did not pass the second generation! Hugely dissapointed in the lack of differing ethnicitys. I've watched Joakims "spökjakt" and those videos actually provides scary jump scares which this movie fails at horribly. The ending with the twist doesn't deliever any message of any kind. Would rather buy 4 beers at Tullen then watch this misery buissnes. Joakim needs to work on his character development and atmosphere in his movies. Strong three out of ten<3.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Feed?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- 巫術
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Stoccolma, Svezia(location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 2.200.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 76.475 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 44min(104 min)
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti




