- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Anthony Chau-Sang Wong
- The Eye
- (as Anthony Wong)
Recensioni in evidenza
The good: beautiful locations, often great cinematography and the film mostly has a great atmosphere (reminded me a bit of Lost in Translation). For its style alone, I'd give it a 7/10
The rest however is pretty bad. No character depth or development, pointless and often involuntarily funny dialogue, which makes the scenes that are supposed to be erotic quite dull And also: hardly any story
If you're looking for a stylishly made movie with no substance that gives you a good laugh from time to time because of its ridiculous dialogue and logic, then you'll at least be entertained.
But from a holistic point of view, I can't give it more than 4/10.
The rest however is pretty bad. No character depth or development, pointless and often involuntarily funny dialogue, which makes the scenes that are supposed to be erotic quite dull And also: hardly any story
If you're looking for a stylishly made movie with no substance that gives you a good laugh from time to time because of its ridiculous dialogue and logic, then you'll at least be entertained.
But from a holistic point of view, I can't give it more than 4/10.
Whoever decided to let Audrey Diwan direct and destroy this nostaligic franchise needs to rather donate the production money to animal welfare.
This movie has nothing in common with the other movies in the franchise and labors on and on with infinite reels of redundant dialogue.
I am happy the franchise has been rebooted but please can they hand the movie back into the hands of a man to make and Audrey Diwan is better suited to directing " Grass is green let's watch it grow" Perhaps the moviemakers should spend some time watching the original movies to better understand what made this franchise actually premiere in movie theatres at one point.
Noemie Merlant was not badly cast, she did her best to bring sexuality into the movie but there was nothing to work with.
No idea what Naomi Watts was doing in this movie.
This movie has nothing in common with the other movies in the franchise and labors on and on with infinite reels of redundant dialogue.
I am happy the franchise has been rebooted but please can they hand the movie back into the hands of a man to make and Audrey Diwan is better suited to directing " Grass is green let's watch it grow" Perhaps the moviemakers should spend some time watching the original movies to better understand what made this franchise actually premiere in movie theatres at one point.
Noemie Merlant was not badly cast, she did her best to bring sexuality into the movie but there was nothing to work with.
No idea what Naomi Watts was doing in this movie.
"Emmanuelle 2024" is a deeply disappointing film that fails to deliver on every level. The plot is painfully slow and directionless, leaving the viewer struggling to find meaning or purpose in the story. Events seem to happen without any coherence or build-up, making it hard to stay invested. The acting is lackluster, with performances that feel uninspired and disconnected. Dialogue is riddled with clichés, adding to the overall sense of mediocrity. Even the visuals, which could have been a saving grace, feel uninspired and fail to make a lasting impression. Watching this movie felt like a complete waste of time and money. I would not recommend it to anyone seeking an engaging or meaningful experience at the cinema.
What an embarassment to the Emmannuelle collection of movies throughout history.
Anyone who has ever watched an Emmanuelle movie knows that it is about sensuality and eroticness above all.
This movie was filmed like it was some new advertisement for a women's perfume. Make of that what you will.
The biggest sin of all is the main casting. Unfortunately, Noémie Merlant while appears sexy and sultry at first, she just doesn't have the physical beauty to live up to the legendary Silvia Kristel.
The movie becomes more and more drab and boring as each scene comes and goes without much excitement.
Overall, for fans of T n A, this was also a colossal disappointment.
Anyone who has ever watched an Emmanuelle movie knows that it is about sensuality and eroticness above all.
This movie was filmed like it was some new advertisement for a women's perfume. Make of that what you will.
The biggest sin of all is the main casting. Unfortunately, Noémie Merlant while appears sexy and sultry at first, she just doesn't have the physical beauty to live up to the legendary Silvia Kristel.
The movie becomes more and more drab and boring as each scene comes and goes without much excitement.
Overall, for fans of T n A, this was also a colossal disappointment.
Emmanuelle (1974) is legendary. Not in any way because the Just Jaeckin classic is an amazing movie, but because it became widely known for two main things:
1) The boundary pushing eroticism of an adventurous woman seeking sexual emancipation/discovery.
2) Sylvia Kristel, a then 22 year-old, who became an icon of perfect beauty.
Although I have never been a fan of remakes, Emmanualle lends itself well to a reimaging simply because sexual attitudes change over time and the original is now over 50 years old.
Emmanuelle (2024) is actually better than I was expecting. The cinematography is especially beautiful, and the tone rather stylish. Noémie Merlant is elegant, somewhat similar looking to a young Phoebe Waller-Bridge, yet her breasts are just as equally voluptuous as that of Kristel's.
Does the movie push the boundaries of today as the '74 classic once did? No, and although it could have well done this, Emmanuelle conciously refrains from drifting into being a piece of generic sleaze by limiting the nudity/sex to where it feels appropriate. Emmanuelle's journey to sexual enlightenment could have had a clearer narrative however.
The addition of Naomi Watts was a rather delightful piece of casting, but regretfully she does not partake in any sexy shenanigans.
Overall, Emmanuelle '24 is a nice enough update. Yet it won't be a significant title 50 years from now or topple the original's reputation.
1) The boundary pushing eroticism of an adventurous woman seeking sexual emancipation/discovery.
2) Sylvia Kristel, a then 22 year-old, who became an icon of perfect beauty.
Although I have never been a fan of remakes, Emmanualle lends itself well to a reimaging simply because sexual attitudes change over time and the original is now over 50 years old.
Emmanuelle (2024) is actually better than I was expecting. The cinematography is especially beautiful, and the tone rather stylish. Noémie Merlant is elegant, somewhat similar looking to a young Phoebe Waller-Bridge, yet her breasts are just as equally voluptuous as that of Kristel's.
Does the movie push the boundaries of today as the '74 classic once did? No, and although it could have well done this, Emmanuelle conciously refrains from drifting into being a piece of generic sleaze by limiting the nudity/sex to where it feels appropriate. Emmanuelle's journey to sexual enlightenment could have had a clearer narrative however.
The addition of Naomi Watts was a rather delightful piece of casting, but regretfully she does not partake in any sexy shenanigans.
Overall, Emmanuelle '24 is a nice enough update. Yet it won't be a significant title 50 years from now or topple the original's reputation.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe lead actress Sylvia Kristel was 21 years old when Emmanuelle (1974) was released. By comparison, Noémie Merlant was 35 with the release of the remake Emmanuelle (2024).
- ConnessioniReferenced in Radio Dolin: The Results of 2024. The Best Films of the Year (2024)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Emmanuelle?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 712.413 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 47min(107 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti