I-5 - Il killer dell'autostrada

This seems to be a well made movie, the story is compelling, and well told.some of the negative reviews are silly. Made at the pumping gas scene because they don't allow that in Oregon? If that guy was paying attention he'd have noticed that was in WASHINGTON (the I-5 Killer was operating across three states). No idea why anyone wouldn't enjoy this movie. The fact that it's not actually easy to figure out who the killer is initially is a nice twist. It seems to be a pretty accurate telling of the hunt for this killer. The fact that he operated massively differently from almost any other well known killer makes it kinda surprising that this seems to be the only movie about him.

Beth Williams (Sara Canning) is a nighttime cleaner at an office building with her co-worker. One night an armed mask man breaks in. After he violates them, he shoots them but Beth survives the ordeal. Police detective Dave Kominek (John Corbett) is investigating the crime, and soon he figures out that it's related to a whole series of murders by the same serial killer around the I-5.

I see there are many complaint about accuracy. I'm not going to dwell on any of that. After all, it's a Lifetime TV movie not an in-depth documentary. John Corbett is a compelling leading man. His character's struggle especially his home life is well done. Sara Canning makes for a good victim without overplaying it. The story moves along well. It's a good TV movie.

haha Lifetime movie about the I-5 killer and he is helping a girl pump gas...in Portland, Oregon. Must have forgot to research...Oregon has NO self serve...never has...research people!!! And who is this Clay guy??? Read Ann Rule's book if you want to know the truth of the matter. This needs ten lines of text, But I find that there is no reason to continue to give a review for such a poorly constructed and thought out movie. Oregon Daily News??? The newspaper would have be the Oregonian. The detective is a doofus who would have been fired by the Portland Police Bureau, he hugs the victim! Comforting her in this manner would likely cause a "small" issue with a good defense attorney, can you say bias?

HUNT FOR THE I-5 KILLER (TV movie 2011) 2.5 out of 10 stars Time to Read: 2:03 min

BASIC PLOT: Based on Ann Rule's book, this is the story of the hunt for a serial killer who preyed on women up and down America's highways. The movie focuses on Detective Dave Kominek (John Corbett), who's put in charge of the I-5 Killer task force, intrusted with the gruesome job of catching this depraved, and monstrous killer. It also focuses on one of the victims who survived, Beth Williams (Sara Canning), and the challenges she faced after her brutal assault.

WHAT WORKS: *NOTHING WORKS AS A COHESIVE PROJECT There's some ok acting from John Corbett, Mike Dopud & Tygh Runyan, but it's not enough to carry this haphazard melange of bad filmmaking decisions.

WHAT DOESN'T WORK: *BAD FILMAKING As humans, we get up to 65% of communication from body language. We empathize, we fear, we relax, based on body language. This movie robs the actors of their basic communication tools, by shooting W-A-A-A-Y too close, and never letting them connect with the viewer. I know I'm supposed to like, and feel confident in Detective Kominek, but because I never see his body, or only the back of his head, or side of his ear as he's talking, I never connect with him. The same is true of Randy Woodfield & Clay Mackie. I know they're supposed to make me uncomfortable, but they're never shot in a way where I connect with them in a good or bad way. This style robs the actors of their needed tools, it's distracting, and makes for a boring movie.

There are also lots of shots of middle aged people that are very unflattering, and uncalled for. It's like they are trying to make their actor's look their worst. Unacceptable filmmaking choices from Allan Kroeker (director) & C. Kim Miles (cinematographer).

*BETH WILLIAMS IS NOT A SYMPATHETIC VICTIM Beth is played by Sara Canning, and she doesn't evoke any sympathy in the viewer. I don't even know if I can blame the actress, the script is bad & the shooting style atrocious.

*THERE'S CONTINUITY PROBLEMS There's a scene at the bar where Randy & Clay are having drinks. They show an outside shot of the bar, and there's cops with their lights on. But the crime hasn't happened yet, so why are cops outside? Then later, when the crime has been discovered, the same outside shot is used (except this time it makes sense as to why there are cops outside - there's been a murder). These are unacceptable mistakes from the continuity editor.

TO RECOMMEND, OR NOT TO RECOMMEND, THAT IS THE QUESTION: *I can't recommend this movie, even though I'm a fan of Mike Dopud, Tygh Runyan & Garry Chalk (who's talents are underused and wasted here). The filmmaking styles used makes this a boring waste of an hour and a half. It feels like you're reading a bad script, instead of being entertained by quality actors. If you're looking for an engaging, and disturbing TV movie, based on serial killers, try L'ultima mossa dell'assassino (2012), starring Gary Cole, Laura Harris & Rossif Sutherland. Another good one is Happy Face Killer (2014) starring David Arquette & Gloria Reuben. Trust me, those are skillfully made films, that will leave you with an unsettled and ominous feeling. This film will not; it's just exploitative, and boring, with more wasted moments than I can count.

CLOSING NOTES: *THIS IS A MADE-FOR-TV MOVIE, please keep that in mind before you watch/rate it. TV movies have a much lower budget, and so your expectations should be adjusted.

*I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO THE FILM, or production in ANY way. This review was NOT written in full, or in part, by a bot. I am just an honest viewer, who wishes for more straight forward reviews (less trolls and fanboys), and better entertainment. Hope I helped you out.

To the reviewer who disliked the movie because you don't pump your own gas. Although I see the point, but there have been instances where I have pumped my own gas in Oregon. I worked out in Hillsboro, Or recently and had to pump my own gas. It is a movie for goodness sake. Not to mention, it is a made-for-tv film. I so far have liked it and it keeps your attention. This is the point of a film to entertain. I get that we want it all to be completly accurate with no flaws but again it is a movie! I thought they did very well and a step up from that cheap lifetime feel of a movie. I would say 6.5 stars is where it lands for me. If you watched it to the end it served it's purpose.