Dopo aver subito una tragedia per mano di soldati invasori nel Donbas, un insegnante di fisica ucraino cerca vendetta. Mette gli occhi su un cecchino russo d'élite la cui eliminazione potreb... Leggi tuttoDopo aver subito una tragedia per mano di soldati invasori nel Donbas, un insegnante di fisica ucraino cerca vendetta. Mette gli occhi su un cecchino russo d'élite la cui eliminazione potrebbe cambiare le sorti del conflitto.Dopo aver subito una tragedia per mano di soldati invasori nel Donbas, un insegnante di fisica ucraino cerca vendetta. Mette gli occhi su un cecchino russo d'élite la cui eliminazione potrebbe cambiare le sorti del conflitto.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 candidature totali
Andrey Mostrenko
- Cap
- (as Andriy Mostrenko)
Vadim Lyalko
- Commander of the GRU (Buryy)
- (as Vadym Lyalko)
Vadim Kurilko
- Hyurza
- (as Vadym Kurylko)
Eugen Volosheniuk
- Batyanya
- (as Yevhen Voloshenyuk)
Zachary Shadrin
- Taras
- (as Zakhar Shadrin)
Recensioni in evidenza
Snipers shooting foreign invaders trying to steal their country throughout the movie.
Loved every moment of the movie 9/10. I truly Hope for a part 2 coming out soon.
Loved every moment of the movie 9/10. I truly Hope for a part 2 coming out soon.
Ignore the negative hit pieces reviews that are clearly political coloured.
IMHO and simply taking this as a straightforward movie without any political consideration, it does it's job really well. None of the emotionally fraught moments of the journey are over dramatized. Nothing is swelled on so there is a constant sense of progression yet nothing is rushed. Attention to detail is good and the acting and cinematography are both strong.
If you like war films and particularly ones with a Sniper focus or element, and you do not have strong political views over Ukraine vs Russia I think you will thoroughly enjoy this film.
IMHO and simply taking this as a straightforward movie without any political consideration, it does it's job really well. None of the emotionally fraught moments of the journey are over dramatized. Nothing is swelled on so there is a constant sense of progression yet nothing is rushed. Attention to detail is good and the acting and cinematography are both strong.
If you like war films and particularly ones with a Sniper focus or element, and you do not have strong political views over Ukraine vs Russia I think you will thoroughly enjoy this film.
This is the perfect example of excellent film making on a low budget.
Rather appropriate story displaying the bravery and courage of the Ukrainian fighters - that of which the Russians will never match.
Top notch camerawork, excellent acting and the pacing of the film keeps you engaged.
Yet another victory for Ukraine.
Rather appropriate story displaying the bravery and courage of the Ukrainian fighters - that of which the Russians will never match.
Top notch camerawork, excellent acting and the pacing of the film keeps you engaged.
Yet another victory for Ukraine.
The intro claims this movie is based on a true story, but I have no idea to what extent. That said, it's a pretty well-made movie. It was made in 2021, well before the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and is based around the 2014 annexation of the Crimea by Russia.
The main protagonist, the titular Raven, played by Aldoshyn Pavlo, does a very good job of portraying the impact of such conflict, with transition from pacifist to war hero. The other really good performance is from Andrey Mostrenko, who plays Raven's commanding officer.
The sniper scenes are well shot and credible. The sound effects are on point too.
The movie paints a bleak picture of war and there's nothing glitzy and shiny about it. Men killing men in bleak conditions.
Well worth watching.
The main protagonist, the titular Raven, played by Aldoshyn Pavlo, does a very good job of portraying the impact of such conflict, with transition from pacifist to war hero. The other really good performance is from Andrey Mostrenko, who plays Raven's commanding officer.
The sniper scenes are well shot and credible. The sound effects are on point too.
The movie paints a bleak picture of war and there's nothing glitzy and shiny about it. Men killing men in bleak conditions.
Well worth watching.
Starts out bizarrely, a teacher and his wife are living the ultimate hippy lifestyle off the grid, maybe this is more prevalent than I've been exposed to, but for the movie, it just seems weird and pointless.
The news reports on them for a sensation piece presumably, but doesn't immediately follow up after his wife is killed..... odd.
It's a great motive for joining a military, but he simply doesn't fit in, and the training, if you want to call it that, is on par with kids playing, but with real guns.
There is literally 2 training scenes on the range, and we're off to fight the war.... except hero boy doesn't bother to listen to his commander, because he's got a good shot on 2 random fighters. Never mind that the commander knows why they're out there, looking for the enemy snipers, but nope, blown away because hero boy couldn't keep his round in his rifle.
Jump to our hero immediately somehow being the go to guy for sniping.... and now he's of course refilling his own ammunition and everything..... So either the pacing of the movie is terrible, and a fair amount of time has passed without any indication of such, or it's just a terrible script.
I'm suspecting it's the latter, since randomly hero boy who didn't seem to get along with his 5 classmates (though he also didn't seem to not get along with them either, there was next to zero emotions showed either way). When two of them went on a mission, off screen and unbeknownst to the viewers, he starts asking about them multiple times, awkwardly. Only for one of them to be dead of course. But wait.... here comes more lack of any emotion...
It ended quite predictably, not a bad thing, but also not riveting.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why they were constantly loading their first round by hand, when the rifles were all magazine fed, unless it's for that one extra round of capacity, than that's fine, but other than that, it makes no sense to do it. I've served in the Canadian military and fired an assortment of weapons, semi auto, full auto, belt fed, mag fed. Never any sniper rifles, so maybe snipers do have a reason for it, just seems unlikely though, and that it was added by someone unfamiliar with weapons.
Oh and to say it's a political statement or propaganda movie, meh, almost every movie is to some extent, even children's cartoons, this one just happens to be a current issue one. It doesn't even detract from the movie.
The news reports on them for a sensation piece presumably, but doesn't immediately follow up after his wife is killed..... odd.
It's a great motive for joining a military, but he simply doesn't fit in, and the training, if you want to call it that, is on par with kids playing, but with real guns.
There is literally 2 training scenes on the range, and we're off to fight the war.... except hero boy doesn't bother to listen to his commander, because he's got a good shot on 2 random fighters. Never mind that the commander knows why they're out there, looking for the enemy snipers, but nope, blown away because hero boy couldn't keep his round in his rifle.
Jump to our hero immediately somehow being the go to guy for sniping.... and now he's of course refilling his own ammunition and everything..... So either the pacing of the movie is terrible, and a fair amount of time has passed without any indication of such, or it's just a terrible script.
I'm suspecting it's the latter, since randomly hero boy who didn't seem to get along with his 5 classmates (though he also didn't seem to not get along with them either, there was next to zero emotions showed either way). When two of them went on a mission, off screen and unbeknownst to the viewers, he starts asking about them multiple times, awkwardly. Only for one of them to be dead of course. But wait.... here comes more lack of any emotion...
It ended quite predictably, not a bad thing, but also not riveting.
For the life of me I cannot figure out why they were constantly loading their first round by hand, when the rifles were all magazine fed, unless it's for that one extra round of capacity, than that's fine, but other than that, it makes no sense to do it. I've served in the Canadian military and fired an assortment of weapons, semi auto, full auto, belt fed, mag fed. Never any sniper rifles, so maybe snipers do have a reason for it, just seems unlikely though, and that it was added by someone unfamiliar with weapons.
Oh and to say it's a political statement or propaganda movie, meh, almost every movie is to some extent, even children's cartoons, this one just happens to be a current issue one. It doesn't even detract from the movie.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis gritty and evocative film follows a physics teacher in the Donbas region who suffers a family tragedy at the hands of invading Russian troops. The ex-pacifist joins the army as an unconventional sniper determined to gain revenge and defend the future of his country.
It was created with support from the Ukrainian State Film Agency, was co-written by Mykola Voronin - the real-life sniper whose story is portrayed - and features about 100 members of the Ukrainian armed forces and national guard. Even aside from those career military personnel, several of the main cast members are currently fighting on the front lines.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Sniper. The White Raven?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 997.800 € (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 881 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 881 USD
- 3 lug 2022
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 6105 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Corvo Bianco: Il cecchino del Donbas (2022)?
Rispondi