Seguite gli eventi degli anni '60, il periodo che precede gli eventi del primo film della serie It di Stephen King.Seguite gli eventi degli anni '60, il periodo che precede gli eventi del primo film della serie It di Stephen King.Seguite gli eventi degli anni '60, il periodo che precede gli eventi del primo film della serie It di Stephen King.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Riepilogo
Reviewers praise 'IT: Welcome to Derry' for its atmosphere, suspense, and expansion of Stephen King's universe. Rich storytelling, haunting tone, and strong performances are highlighted. However, criticisms include overuse of CGI, weak acting, and pacing issues. Some find it derivative or unoriginal, drawing unfavorable comparisons to 'Stranger Things'. Despite mixed opinions, the series is noted for its potential to engage horror fans and expand the lore of Derry and Pennywise.
Recensioni in evidenza
As it says, IT was my childhood favorite; watching this in 2025 brought back a little emotion. Watching Pennywise processed from different perspectives is very interesting to see. The series was more gripping as you came close to the end. IT makes you sit in front of the screen and won't let you up until you finish it. The series has detail after detail; if you want to catch all of it, then you need to go back to old movies and the novel every 10 minutes as you're watching. IT was a great experience.
The introduction was great and compelling. They did a good job on the character development, and the plot of the show. However, getting towards the end, it was starting to get stale. It felt like the kids didn't feel very compelling to me, because I was losing interest in the kids characters towards the end. I can say the conclusion was heartfelt, and it gave us a cliff hanger for chapter 2 to tie in.
Overall, it was a decent show. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great.
Overall, it was a decent show. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't great.
I genuinely didn't know how to feel at first. Some episodes are bonkers, some interesting, some slow, and some downright stupid. The acting is mixed and the pacing uneven. And yet, after a few episodes, I was counting down the days until each new release. Skarsgård absolutely nails it - his presence (and that dance) lingers in your nightmares. Frustrating, flawed, but strangely addictive. I'm actually disappointed it's over!
IT: Welcome to Derry delivers a masterclass in storytelling and execution. The narrative is engaging, well-paced, and truly captures the eerie essence of Stephen King's universe. The characters feel real, the town's atmosphere is chilling, and the plot unfolds with precision, keeping you hooked throughout the season.
However, if you're hoping for classic jump scares, you might be disappointed. This franchise has moved past cheap shocks, focusing instead on an expected, psychological style of horror. While this approach is effective, it makes the scares somewhat predictable for seasoned horror fans.
Overall, a beautifully crafted horror season that excels in storytelling, atmosphere, and suspense-just don't come here expecting your heart to leap from sudden jumps.
However, if you're hoping for classic jump scares, you might be disappointed. This franchise has moved past cheap shocks, focusing instead on an expected, psychological style of horror. While this approach is effective, it makes the scares somewhat predictable for seasoned horror fans.
Overall, a beautifully crafted horror season that excels in storytelling, atmosphere, and suspense-just don't come here expecting your heart to leap from sudden jumps.
This new chapter of IT takes a noticeably different approach, and for the most part, it is a "Welcome" one. The use of CGI will likely be a point of debate, but here it feels far more controlled and purposeful than in the previous films. Rather than relying on visual effects purely for shock value, the CGI works to support the atmosphere and scale of the horror. In that sense, it represents a clear technical upgrade from IT Chapter 1 and 2.
Compared to the earlier IT films, this entry feels more controlled in its storytelling. While pacing issues have not disappeared entirely, they are handled with more consistency, allowing tension to develop instead of constantly resetting itself. The film shows more patience in letting ideas and atmosphere settle, and it makes a clearer effort to explore where Pennywise comes from and why it exists. That added context gives the horror more weight without losing its mystery.
The most notable improvement lies in the type of horror being explored. Instead of relying primarily on jump scares, the film leans into body horror and psychological unease. Jump scares are still present and occasionally predictable, but they are no longer the main driver of fear. The emphasis on discomfort and lingering dread creates a more effective and mature horror experience. Centering the story on Pennywise proves to be a strong creative choice. It allows the narrative to feel tighter and more cohesive, and the smaller plot threads integrate naturally without feeling forced. The film feels confident in its direction, building atmosphere rather than rushing toward the next scare. The cinematography and lighting are handled with care, using angles and shadow to strengthen the tension and mood throughout.
Overall, this entry feels like a more assured step forward for the franchise. It is not flawless, particularly in its pacing, but it demonstrates a clearer understanding of its identity and tone.
I am the eater of worlds!
Compared to the earlier IT films, this entry feels more controlled in its storytelling. While pacing issues have not disappeared entirely, they are handled with more consistency, allowing tension to develop instead of constantly resetting itself. The film shows more patience in letting ideas and atmosphere settle, and it makes a clearer effort to explore where Pennywise comes from and why it exists. That added context gives the horror more weight without losing its mystery.
The most notable improvement lies in the type of horror being explored. Instead of relying primarily on jump scares, the film leans into body horror and psychological unease. Jump scares are still present and occasionally predictable, but they are no longer the main driver of fear. The emphasis on discomfort and lingering dread creates a more effective and mature horror experience. Centering the story on Pennywise proves to be a strong creative choice. It allows the narrative to feel tighter and more cohesive, and the smaller plot threads integrate naturally without feeling forced. The film feels confident in its direction, building atmosphere rather than rushing toward the next scare. The cinematography and lighting are handled with care, using angles and shadow to strengthen the tension and mood throughout.
Overall, this entry feels like a more assured step forward for the franchise. It is not flawless, particularly in its pacing, but it demonstrates a clearer understanding of its identity and tone.
I am the eater of worlds!
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Sinister sequels, eerie indies, and blockbuster boo-fests — here are the most exciting horror movies and shows to add to your Watchlist.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to director Andy Muschietti, Bill Skarsgård was "hesitant" to return as Pennywise because "he had played a lot of very dark characters... it takes a toll to live in the head of those characters for a long time." However, Skarsgård finally agreed because he was interested in exploring Pennywise's backstory as Bob Gray.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe title sequence is made of pleasant paintings of Derry with IT in them, as they slowly become more violent and nightmarish.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Half in the Bag: Halloween Hangover (2025) (2025)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h(60 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti






