VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,9/10
12.528
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Segui il viaggio di un uomo verso il futuro per salvare un mondo morente.Segui il viaggio di un uomo verso il futuro per salvare un mondo morente.Segui il viaggio di un uomo verso il futuro per salvare un mondo morente.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Meme Thorne
- Newsreader
- (as Mémé Thorne)
Recensioni in evidenza
I am a fan of what the Mothers of Invention called Cheapness. Science fiction movies, primarily from the 1950s and 1960s, in which you could tell Godzilla was a man in a rubber suit, or see the strings suspending the rocket against the black backdrop of outer space. This film, made in Australia, is a modern version of Cheapness. The time machine at the center of the story appears to be a large piece of concrete piping decorated with blinking lights and plastic tubing. There is absolutely no CGI and only one or two soundstage sets. Paintings are used to depict future cityscapes. The story is disconnected, the script straight-up-corny, and the antagonists predictable. But, if you relax and enjoy, without looking for the lack of continuity, it's entirely enjoyable escapism. I really don't think this movie takes itself too seriously and you shouldn't either.
Don't really want to slate this as it tries really hard.
Kept me up til 1am and I still rated it a 6.
Low budget (tried a bit hard to be higher budget) sci-fi with just enough to make you want to see it through.
Music was a bit over the top in places, the actor that played the little kid (although small part) is going places, watch this space.
Trailer made it look much better than it was unfortunately. 6/10 seems fair.
I found this a very interesting concept and story, ruined by some terrible acting (apart from Ryan Kwanten) and the lead character spending most of the movie blubbering and crying (even more than Burnham on ST: Discovery!!!). Also, the music score is absolutely woeful. So many bad choices for the scenes they were meant to enhance.
Bigger budget and a better cast may have helped.
What could have been brilliant was spoiled by a huge inexplicable plot fail. Poor acting generally and I'll conceived casting. Except for Ryan who added some well needed substance. Good plot except for the massive hole in it. Hard to believe someone would sign off on this prior to release, or at some point say... hey... hang on a minute, this doesn't actually add up!
Not a bad flick, but not noteworthy either. The effects were decent and gave it a proper sci-fi setting. The Dialogue was wanting, and to be honest, too much crying going on, far too much! It is one of those sci-fis were you have to ignore the science, just accept the plot holes the inaccuracies make. The acting was pretty stiff. It tried hard and probably the effects were the best feature of the film - which is a bit worrying. All in all though, still gets a 5 for a Sunday afternoon which is a pass and not a complete fail
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAlthough the movie takes place in Australia and everyone speaks with an Australian accent, Jude, played by Australian actor Ryan Kwanten, is the only character in the film that inexplicably speaks with an American accent.
- BlooperThey are sending someone 400 years forward in time. With no clue or anything in what kind of (unfriendly?) environment he will arrive. And they don't give him any food or drink for the first days in the future? So he has to eat some berries which are unknown and turned out to be very poisonous.
- Curiosità sui creditiNo butterflies were harmed during the making of this film.
- ConnessioniReferences The Time Machine (2002)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 2067?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 54min(114 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti