Dopo che il mondo è in rovina, a causa di una piaga provocata dall'uomo, segue una battaglia di proporzioni bibliche tra i sopravvissuti.Dopo che il mondo è in rovina, a causa di una piaga provocata dall'uomo, segue una battaglia di proporzioni bibliche tra i sopravvissuti.Dopo che il mondo è in rovina, a causa di una piaga provocata dall'uomo, segue una battaglia di proporzioni bibliche tra i sopravvissuti.
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'The Stand' adaptation receives mixed reactions. Praise for casting and production values, with standout performances by James Marsden and Alexander Skarsgard. Criticisms include non-linear storytelling and deviations from the novel, causing confusion and disappointing book purists. Some appreciate the modern take, finding the series engaging despite flaws. Themes of good versus evil and the apocalypse receive varied responses, with some feeling the depth and tension are lacking. Overall, it's seen as a decent but imperfect adaptation.
Recensioni in evidenza
It's a nine part TV adaptation of the Stephen King novel of good versus evil. It's not any better than the 1994 version. More money may have been spent but it's not better. The structure is more disjointed which leaves the characters less compelling. I don't like Whoopi Goldberg in this role. The last episode feels stretched out which leaves it without tension. After the climax, the series needs to end. It's an unnecessary update of this material. If it needs doing, it needs some better imagination to bring new life to the story.
I don't like making comparisons, but I can't help it in this instance. The 1994 miniseries had it's flaws, but at least it stuck to the main themes of the book; the human beings as pawns in a game of good and evil, who they are and become. Only one episode left of the 2020 version and I feel nothing for any of the characters, simply because I don't know them.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
It is based on a massive book, but the 1994 miniseries managed to create a cohesively evolving story and characters. And that in a 6 hour long series. This version has 9 hours and yet the story is so all over the place that so many things don't make sense anymore. As if the writers were puzzling and piecing, cutting and pasting, until they just gave up, rather than working until it made sense.
This version seems to hope it can get by on chock value, but it completely misses the point when turning New Vegas into a Sodom or Gomorrah, rather than a fascist state, for example.
It's a hot mess, and if you're too lazy to read the book, then watch the 1994 version instead.
Why does everyone think they can rewrite King and make it better? I can't think of one time this worked out but they still insist on rewriting King just in case THEIR version is better. It isn't. I'm 15 minutes in on episode one and it's a confused mess. I know the novel well and read both the abridged and unabridged version. There's an ocean of material to work with so if you're tossing it all and making up your own story it's pure ego! And I might say it isn;t a tenth as good. I doubt I'll watch anymore. I'm expending too much energy trying to untangle their mess with my memories of the novels. The original mini series sucked but at least they vaguely followed the story! Why pay a fortune for King rights then rewrite the story??? All they care about is a sellable name, they don;t even want his story, they just want his name and a concept then they'll write their own script that won;t be a tenth as good as if they followed the novel but hey, they got their ego stroked and people will still watch it even if it's incoherent garbage.
I've read a few reviews from Stephen King groupies...and fair enough. The 1994 series had me mesmerized, though I had let it slip from memory. So this was exciting.
Really if life came down to these characters, we are mince. It's so hard to identify with the 'righteous' at times, they seem oblivious to the world they're in. And the 'unclean' are really bland, the depravity is what you'd see going on if the world never went through this 'apocalypse' anyway. There is no awe at the Man himself, though he presents as the most watchable character...I don't know if there is enough going on to pique the interest to see it through.
Hideous adaptation of Stephen King's sprawling novel stupidly breaks up the narrative into flashbacks and flash forwards, thus destroying any dramatic tension that might have existed. But I doubt there was any anyway under the lousy direction by a whole bunch of people. Was King involved in this mess?
Narrative aside, most of the cast is awful. Whoopi Goldberg and James Marsden are good. Everyone else stinks. I've never seen so much hammy overacting in one show. And all the blonde girls looks alike.
The timing of this mini-series is probably off. Showing a mini about the end of civilization in the midst of a pandemic might not have been the best idea. It leaves a sour taste.
The show runners here turned King's serious novel into a comic book.
Narrative aside, most of the cast is awful. Whoopi Goldberg and James Marsden are good. Everyone else stinks. I've never seen so much hammy overacting in one show. And all the blonde girls looks alike.
The timing of this mini-series is probably off. Showing a mini about the end of civilization in the midst of a pandemic might not have been the best idea. It leaves a sour taste.
The show runners here turned King's serious novel into a comic book.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBryan Cranston: A voice-only appearance as the President of the United States in episode 1, giving an address to the people about the virus. Cranston agreed to the role after being asked by co-creator Benjamin Cavell.
- BlooperWhen Stu is taken to the first military facility in Texas they say it is in Kileen. The name of the city is spelled Killeen.
- ConnessioniFeatured in The Cinema Snob: The Stand 2020 (2021)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Stand
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 57min
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
- 2.4:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti