VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,3/10
1126
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAn FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.An FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.An FBI agent with time-bending powers must fight sinister forces from the future to save her loved ones from being erased from existence.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 vittorie totali
Ali Durham
- Sally Jo Biggs
- (as Alesandra Durham)
K. Danor Gerald
- Jerry
- (as Danor Gerald)
Alix Maria Taulbee
- Trudy
- (as Alix Taulbee)
- …
Christopher Robin Miller
- Scrooge
- (as Christopher Miller)
Recensioni in evidenza
So let's get one thing clear and set the record straight right from the get-go: all the reviews here on IMDb that are 9s or 10s are clearly not real, but rather faked reviews by people who worked on this low budget flick or are friends or family -- for this is surely NOT a 9 or a 10, Hell, it's not even a 6 7 or 8. I LOVED the idea of the plot/storyline; time travel is my thing. So seeing that it was free due to Prime, I figured "why not? It's Sunday morning and I'm not even awake yet." Within a minute or two I heard what could possibly be the worst, and most unprofessional and amateurish dialog by a male actor being delivered that I've ever heard in my life -- seriously. And I work IN the entertainment business (obviously), so I've seen and heard it all. But this was just AWFUL. BUT I hung on simply due to the fact that I was intrigued by the alleged storyline. Honestly glad I did. Though this is one of the worst movies I've ever seen -- in terms of the art craft and science of movie-making -- clearly a very low budget indie film made by amateurs, it also has had me thinking about it and it's ramifications non-stop since I watched it. It IS a good story. Interesting, well thought out, intriguing. It's just not a "professional" movie. That's all. If you can accept that from the start, AND you dig sci-fi and/or time travel movies, then you just may enjoy this indie movie. Everyone has to start somewhere... And this is where this crew happened to start. Frankly, for the alleged $750k budget they had to work with, one could almost applaud their effort. So 5 out of 10 is a fair assessment.
For me,in general,a movie has to be pretty awful to merit anything less than 3 stars.........and this one came pretty close.
I don't expect a lot from low budget affairs. As long as a decent effort has been made to entertain the viewer,then much can be overlooked or forgiven.This movie however, (and I use the word "movie" in the loosest term) has probably some of THE worst acting I have ever the misfortune to witness. The performances from all concerned are so stiff and wooden,that you could turn the awful script into a baseball bat and hit a home run!! Particularly annoying is Joel Bishops narration throughout this mess.It really does sound like a 5 year old reading from a school play script and is pretty soulless in it's delivery.In fact a 5 year old could have done a better job. The rest of the cast really don't fare much better either.Nobody puts in a decent enough performance to make their characters convincing and look like they'd really rather be somewhere else. It really was unforgivable.I'm sorry.........if you want to put yourself in front of a camera and entertain,then you really should at least try to do better than this!!.
I did,however,note that "some" effort was made in the special effects department,and given the budget,they weren't bad at all.
Oh sorry......the plot.
Forget it.......
It's something to do with time travel but really,please don't waste your time.It's so confusing that I really cannot explain exactly what the hell was going on.
I dare say that with a bigger budget,script writer and cast,this could be made into something better.
Apparently this was based on a book.I wish I had read that instead.
3 out of ten and that's only because I've seen worse........
No really I have!!
Watch at your peril
I don't expect a lot from low budget affairs. As long as a decent effort has been made to entertain the viewer,then much can be overlooked or forgiven.This movie however, (and I use the word "movie" in the loosest term) has probably some of THE worst acting I have ever the misfortune to witness. The performances from all concerned are so stiff and wooden,that you could turn the awful script into a baseball bat and hit a home run!! Particularly annoying is Joel Bishops narration throughout this mess.It really does sound like a 5 year old reading from a school play script and is pretty soulless in it's delivery.In fact a 5 year old could have done a better job. The rest of the cast really don't fare much better either.Nobody puts in a decent enough performance to make their characters convincing and look like they'd really rather be somewhere else. It really was unforgivable.I'm sorry.........if you want to put yourself in front of a camera and entertain,then you really should at least try to do better than this!!.
I did,however,note that "some" effort was made in the special effects department,and given the budget,they weren't bad at all.
Oh sorry......the plot.
Forget it.......
It's something to do with time travel but really,please don't waste your time.It's so confusing that I really cannot explain exactly what the hell was going on.
I dare say that with a bigger budget,script writer and cast,this could be made into something better.
Apparently this was based on a book.I wish I had read that instead.
3 out of ten and that's only because I've seen worse........
No really I have!!
Watch at your peril
I don't review movies often, mostly because I'm lazy and don't want to take the time.
However, after reading so many negative and almost hateful reviews, I wanted to leave something else.
This isn't a 'great' film, but I found it intriguing and even a little emotional.
A few keys to remember as you watch:
1: Its a LOW BUDGET film. I'd be willing to bet, it was a labor of love for those involved.
2: Its an art film of sorts. What does this mean? That its ending is sort of open.
3: Some people aren't making the big bucks as actors for a reason, but it doesn't mean they're bad.
There is a story that slowly unfolds before you. A person who changes and fights against everything to change her future, anyway she can.
If you can't get past the budget and lower grade actors, then stop watching and give up. You've set higher standards than this film can live up too.
Personally, I've always had the ability to look past actors I don't like, to enjoy a movie. Sometimes, I just want to get lost in a story and I did with this one.
Kristy C
However, after reading so many negative and almost hateful reviews, I wanted to leave something else.
This isn't a 'great' film, but I found it intriguing and even a little emotional.
A few keys to remember as you watch:
1: Its a LOW BUDGET film. I'd be willing to bet, it was a labor of love for those involved.
2: Its an art film of sorts. What does this mean? That its ending is sort of open.
3: Some people aren't making the big bucks as actors for a reason, but it doesn't mean they're bad.
There is a story that slowly unfolds before you. A person who changes and fights against everything to change her future, anyway she can.
If you can't get past the budget and lower grade actors, then stop watching and give up. You've set higher standards than this film can live up too.
Personally, I've always had the ability to look past actors I don't like, to enjoy a movie. Sometimes, I just want to get lost in a story and I did with this one.
Kristy C
It starts like it's recapping the previous episode in a crazy sci fi series, trying to bring you up to speed. It actually highlights some of the events in the movie itself. Really??
Usual problem here - writer/director. No one to question or query his grand vision. Desperately needed in such a potentially complex story.
Initially, some of the voices sound like they've been dubbed. And there are some brilliant(!) shots of actors talking with their mouths covered by various objects. One can only assume the writer/director was trying to plug holes in the plot by explanations. Maybe he was listening to someone. Unfortunately, not enough.
The direction/editing is poor in many places and really flags it as amateur/low budget. And there are some poor casting choices.
Some of the dialogue is just off plot and character. At one point it descends into totally incongruous family argument.
The whole plot is very convoluted, confused and unclear. You could be half way through the movie before you understand who everyone is and what's going on. And even 2/3rds of the way through, it's still confusing.
Of course, being a time travel movie, there are the inevitable anomalies. Unfortunately, there are a few glaring ones. It's not a suspension of disbelief thing, but the way time and time travel is supposed to work in the movie - it varies to support the plot.
There is a sort of twist or two but by this time you're probably not bothered and the attempt at the twisty reveal thing at the end was so predictable.
And the music jars terribly. Some of it's just really annoying but most of the time it's waaaaaay over the top. Oh, writer/director and composer have the same surname. Nepotism, perhaps?
The result is a bitty, scrappy, movie that does no favours for anyone, especially time travel fans. The subject matter alone gives it a second star but time travel fans will miss nothing (but a poor movie) by giving this a miss.
Usual problem here - writer/director. No one to question or query his grand vision. Desperately needed in such a potentially complex story.
Initially, some of the voices sound like they've been dubbed. And there are some brilliant(!) shots of actors talking with their mouths covered by various objects. One can only assume the writer/director was trying to plug holes in the plot by explanations. Maybe he was listening to someone. Unfortunately, not enough.
The direction/editing is poor in many places and really flags it as amateur/low budget. And there are some poor casting choices.
Some of the dialogue is just off plot and character. At one point it descends into totally incongruous family argument.
The whole plot is very convoluted, confused and unclear. You could be half way through the movie before you understand who everyone is and what's going on. And even 2/3rds of the way through, it's still confusing.
Of course, being a time travel movie, there are the inevitable anomalies. Unfortunately, there are a few glaring ones. It's not a suspension of disbelief thing, but the way time and time travel is supposed to work in the movie - it varies to support the plot.
There is a sort of twist or two but by this time you're probably not bothered and the attempt at the twisty reveal thing at the end was so predictable.
And the music jars terribly. Some of it's just really annoying but most of the time it's waaaaaay over the top. Oh, writer/director and composer have the same surname. Nepotism, perhaps?
The result is a bitty, scrappy, movie that does no favours for anyone, especially time travel fans. The subject matter alone gives it a second star but time travel fans will miss nothing (but a poor movie) by giving this a miss.
A very small budget Science fiction movie, possibly made for TV that kept me entertained throughout. I am a sucker for time travel, but it had some original ideas that impressed me. The effects are really not that important, use your imagination, the plot kept me interested and the acting was reasonable. Special note for the character called Brego, a person from the distant future with a wonderfully camp South West English accent, put a smile on my face every time he opened his mouth. Anyone who is a lover of Sci-fi should give this movie a try, far better than some of the Hollywood rubbish.
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperThroughout the film The Captain has a '95' shield badge on his chest. However, when he actually goes back to meet Sally it changes to become '95ers', then back to '95' moments later.
- Colonne sonoreProfundis
Written by Paul O'Connor
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- 95ers: Echoes
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 750.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 36 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1 / (high definition)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was 95ers: Time Runners (2013) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi