Tiger Eyes

One need not know Judy Blume's novel specifically to glean a firm sense that this is a work very much aimed toward teens and young adults. Obviously the protagonist is a teenager, but that slant is borne out in more subtle ways, such as how any scenes or events that don't distinctly center Davey's memories or experiences tend to be spoken of in vague terms, or discrete blocks that are a little curt. Some of the dialogue is a little blunt, or needless or gauche, and the scene writing; I dare say the plot follows a recognizable thrust of a young lead put thrust into difficult circumstances (one parent sick or dead, one parent struggling and unreliable, new surroundings or friends), working through their emotions, and Learning Something About Themselves. None of this means another iteration of such a story can't be worthwhile, and indeed, 'Tiger eyes' is duly engaging and satisfying - it's just safe to say that one broadly knows what to expect.

Familiar threads aside, and slight inelegance, this is quite well done all around. Even though we've effectively sen it before, the narrative is heartfelt, and softly compelling and impactful. The characters, similarly, may be stock material, but they are written only with sincerity, and I very much like the cast. Amy Jo Johnson and Cynthia Stevenson I know well, and though both have only supporting parts, they ably demonstrate why they're so dependable. I can't say I've seen much of Willa Holland or Tatanka Means, yet both illustrate commendable nuance and heart that does much to make this so worthwhile; I'd love to see more of their pictures. Even Elise Eberle and Russell Means, in still smaller parts, light up the screen with the presence and personality they carry, and it's a joy to watch them. And filmmaker Lawrence Blume shows a solid command of the medium, breaking through the marginal choppiness of the YA storytelling to craft a warm, meaningful drama that reaches beyond its target audience.

Flush with themes of grief, impermanence, control, coping, and more, and playing with major beats of illness, death, and fraught family or social dynamics, all such big ideas are realized in a way that makes them relatable to a wide viewership, and more fruitful as a result. 'Tiger eyes' came and went in 2012 with little fanfare or recognition, and I think that's deeply unfortunate. Though a tad imperfect, by and large this is certainly much stronger, and hits harder, than I had assumed sights unseen. It bears substantial gravity and emotional weight more closely resembling its more adult-oriented cousins than its young adult kin, and all involved put in excellent work in all regards to bring it to life. I'm really very pleased with how good this is, to the point that as far as I'm concerned it earns a blanket recommendation. If you have the opportunity to watch, this is well worth ninety minutes of your time.

Sadly, this film is proof that good books can't be always translated into good films.

To me, this film is nothing like the book. There is no mood set, the cast is totally wrong---the parents look like they could be the brother/sister of Davey, not parents. All poignant dialogue and scenes from the book are removed. There is no building of scenes, and they just did not translate grief except for a few brief moments. They moved and shifted characters and didn't have enough flash back sequences to unfold the mystery of Davey's grief, like in the book.

Sadly, I was thoroughly disappointed all around. The fact they changed the ending as well---nothing was done right--they showed no growth of Davey as we see in the book.

There are brief moments where you can really feel the grief, but sadly, with no build up, or even getting to know Davey, it falls too short.

I asked my wife for her opinion before watching this movie. She told me that as a teenager she used to read all the Judy Blume books, and that it's probably more a movie for a younger audience. I gave it a shot anyway, and to be honest I regret it. It's a boring movie, and yes it's clearly something a younger audience will like more than the average movie watcher. I already had my suspicions when I heard that irritating slow piano music between scenes, it's a typical thing for bad movies. It's almost a signature for lame movies. I won't say the acting was bad, just average, but the story is one of those where you will fight to stay awake. Not for me.

Davey Wexler (Willa Holland) is struggling after her father was killed. Her mother Gwen (Amy Jo Johnson) has withdrawn. She, her mother and little brother Jason move from Atlantic City to New Mexico to stay with Gwen's older sister Bitsy Kronick (Cynthia Stevenson) and her husband Walter. At the new school, she's befriended by partygirl Jane Albertson (Elise Eberle). While walking alone in a canyon, she is found by native American Wolf who connects with her. She tells him her name is Tiger.

This movie is based on Judy Blume's novel directed by her son Lawrence Blume. It's a teen girl struggling with some difficult issues. The difficulties are large and varied. It's a bit scattered. Willa Holland is quite effective holding the film together. Her performance adds the sensitivity needed although I'm not sure the material is used to its most effectiveness.

I really enjoyed this movie. From the music to the acting and of course the story. A movie based from Judy Bloom's 1981 novel. I really liked the movie. I think this is a movie that people of all ages can watch and enjoy. Not just for younger people.

I really liked Willa Holland as I think she did a fantastic job portraying Davey Wexler. Tanaka Means also gave a brilliant roll in this movie as his father (RIP).

This is a really good movie. I enjoed the light hearted, coming of age feel that it has throughout the film. I feel enlightented after waching it. Give it a try - I don't think it will dissapoint.