Nel prossimo futuro, una squadra di giornalisti viaggia attraverso gli Stati Uniti durante una guerra civile in rapida arrampicata che ha travolto l'intera nazione.Nel prossimo futuro, una squadra di giornalisti viaggia attraverso gli Stati Uniti durante una guerra civile in rapida arrampicata che ha travolto l'intera nazione.Nel prossimo futuro, una squadra di giornalisti viaggia attraverso gli Stati Uniti durante una guerra civile in rapida arrampicata che ha travolto l'intera nazione.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 58 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Civil War' delves into war journalism, conflict brutality, and societal impact, though it faces criticism for lacking context, underdeveloped characters, and political neutrality. Praise is given for cinematography, sound design, and performances, yet some find it slow-paced and shallow. The portrayal of journalists sparks debate, with appreciation for their perspective but critique of their ethics and motivations.
Recensioni in evidenza
The title is "Civil War" but that's the closest you're gonna get to an actual Civil War during this movie.
This is sort of a low rent version of Apocalypse Now. The characters are going on a mission to reach the White House. And along the way they wind up in several violent misadventures.
But Apocalypse Now fleshed out the target - Colonel Kurtz. In this story, we have no idea who the President is psychologically and why others want to kill him. So the underlying motivation driving the protagonist is completely lacking.
Moreover, during the course of what is supposedly a war, some of the characters engage in teenage antics that undermine the seriousness of their plight.
As many other commentators have stated - this movie is disjointed. If you're expecting to see a Civil War, DON'T watch this movie. There ain't one in there.
This is sort of a low rent version of Apocalypse Now. The characters are going on a mission to reach the White House. And along the way they wind up in several violent misadventures.
But Apocalypse Now fleshed out the target - Colonel Kurtz. In this story, we have no idea who the President is psychologically and why others want to kill him. So the underlying motivation driving the protagonist is completely lacking.
Moreover, during the course of what is supposedly a war, some of the characters engage in teenage antics that undermine the seriousness of their plight.
As many other commentators have stated - this movie is disjointed. If you're expecting to see a Civil War, DON'T watch this movie. There ain't one in there.
I think many people have missed the real message of the movie. Could it have been better, of course. However, my rating isn't about the movies political implications, but rather about how it shows the possibility of our country heading in that direction. The film effectively illustrates potential realities we could face. It highlights how extremists on both sides, driven solely by their own beliefs, can overlook the impact on others. One of the early scenes brought me to tears, reflecting on the possibility of such actions happening among us. By the end, I was overwhelmed with a sense of dread. I encourage you to watch this film with an open mind, rather than expecting polarizing content, so you can grasp how quickly our relatively young nation could shift towards such a daunting new normal.
I had high hopes for this movie as Alex Garland rarely disappoints,. But its a very shallow script like a six part mini series where the action scenes have been edited into a movie. There is no explanation of why there is a civil war, who is fighting who, what the outcome is or anything else that might cast some light on the situation. We just follow some unimportant characters through some hairy experiences. The movie should have been a mini series with a credible story line and a lot more characters elucidating the factions and their motivations. A week after watching it I had forgotten it! Don't waste your time.
There is a good movie to be made about the polarisation and aggression of US politics leading to civil war. This was not it. Uses a grossly undeveloped political scenario as an excuse to show us routine, gratuitous violence and contrived relationships. Casting an actress who looks 14 as a 23 year old was a big mistake and pushing her from wide eyed innocence through a ridiculous, unbelievable journey to awakening ambition via horror was crudely handled. Taking photos of people while they suffer and die is obscene and the pain and gore of violence was trivialised, not dignified by this sad movie.
I've watched this Film four times and every time I seem to like it more. Most everyone I know felt let down with It and I almost skipped it. But I am so glad I didn't because I find more of the message each time I do. The soundtrack for me sets the mood with not being mainstream and actually creates an unfamiliar terrifying world. The dark shadows in the photography also set the tone of what the Country is experiencing. Is there action? Sure there is and I feel too much would have ruined the message and the mission of the characters. The action and violence is unsettling, but appropriately placed. I don't think the filmmaker intended to make an action film. Forget what others have said and give it a watch.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn an interview with The New York Times, director Alex Garland revealed that the "Christmas Wonderland" decorations in the sniper scene were not designed for the movie. Someone had built it as an attraction and decided to leave it up after the attraction was a financial failure. Alex decided to incorporate it into the movie to symbolize the chaos in the country. "If you haven't put away the Christmas decorations, clearly something isn't right."
- BlooperA military helicopter will not turn on its navigation lights during combat.
- Citazioni
Joel: There has to be some mistake. We're American, right?
Unnamed Soldier: Okay. What kind of American are you? You don't know?
- Curiosità sui creditiThe opening A24 and DNA logos are accompanied by static from a pink noise calibration test.
- Colonne sonoreLovefingers
Written by Simeon Coxe & Stanley Warren
Performed by Silver Apples
Courtesy of MCA Records Inc.
Under license from Universal Music Operations Ltd.
Published by Rough Trade Publishing Ltd.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Civil War?Powered by Alexa
- Was the President a bad guy?
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 50.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 68.756.072 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 25.537.368 USD
- 14 apr 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 127.268.065 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 49 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti