Tre giocatori che si conoscevano da adolescenti gareggiano in un torneo di tennis per diventare il vincitore del Grande Slam di fama mondiale e riaccendono vecchie rivalità dentro e fuori da... Leggi tuttoTre giocatori che si conoscevano da adolescenti gareggiano in un torneo di tennis per diventare il vincitore del Grande Slam di fama mondiale e riaccendono vecchie rivalità dentro e fuori dal campo.Tre giocatori che si conoscevano da adolescenti gareggiano in un torneo di tennis per diventare il vincitore del Grande Slam di fama mondiale e riaccendono vecchie rivalità dentro e fuori dal campo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 74 vittorie e 151 candidature totali
Shane T Harris
- Art's Security Guard
- (as a different name)
A.J. Lister
- Lily
- (as AJ Lister)
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Challengers' is a visually striking film with intense performances by Zendaya, Mike Faist, and Josh O'Connor. Its non-linear narrative and use of tennis as a metaphor for personal struggles are noted. The cinematography and soundtrack by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross are praised, though some find the script lacking and characters underdeveloped. The ambiguous ending sparks debate, with mixed reactions to its narrative and character development.
Recensioni in evidenza
I had very high expectations for this movie to come out and planned weeks in advance to see it. Perhaps that was unfair to factor in for my rating, but overall it missed the mark.
I had trouble following the timelines of certain scenes and felt confused throughout. Also, the movie basically has only three characters that have any role of significance which I felt was odd. Perhaps the umpire would be considered the fourth character that you see and he has a very small part.
I thought Zendaya was brilliant, but I didn't particularly like her character or the two competitors. There was nobody that you wanted to root for. For a tennis movie, rather go for Wimbledon than this one unfortunately.
I had trouble following the timelines of certain scenes and felt confused throughout. Also, the movie basically has only three characters that have any role of significance which I felt was odd. Perhaps the umpire would be considered the fourth character that you see and he has a very small part.
I thought Zendaya was brilliant, but I didn't particularly like her character or the two competitors. There was nobody that you wanted to root for. For a tennis movie, rather go for Wimbledon than this one unfortunately.
I felt that three of them were good but Guadagino chose to focus on (a) the product placement (god.. could they be more obvious?) (b) the annoying soundtrack accompanying the endless scenes in slow motion of people staring at each other, and (c) cool camera angles. Don't get me wrong. I understand film is another language in itself but I think the acting is far from the priority of the filmmaker. In the few moments where we get to see them interact with each other there is chemistry. I don't understand why he (or Amazon) chose not to focus more on that. I was so over that annoying soundtrack of gay 90s club. Did he choose to cut the story like that because he knew there was not much story to tell to begin with?
I went to see this yesterday although it was not my choice.
I tried to disregard that tennis mostly bores me.
Usually perceptive, but I did not get the point of the film.
A love triangle spanning 13 years with Zendaya as the master manipulator. What was she doing? Making the chaps better tennis players, making them grow up, making them aware that their long time friendship was more than just that. I do not know and then you ask yourself, why?
On the plus side, Josh O'Connor was mesmerising, turning in a good performance. The music was good, if on occasion a tad overdramatic for the scene being played out. Some titters.
On the minus side, the tennis montages grew tedious, the time jumps a little too often, particularly towards the end of the film.
There was one scene in a locker room, where I could not understand a word that was being said, I thought it was not in English, but I could not understand the gist or the purpose. Very frustrating.
The film was too long (I saw people leave) and, dare I say it, a little pointless.
I tried to disregard that tennis mostly bores me.
Usually perceptive, but I did not get the point of the film.
A love triangle spanning 13 years with Zendaya as the master manipulator. What was she doing? Making the chaps better tennis players, making them grow up, making them aware that their long time friendship was more than just that. I do not know and then you ask yourself, why?
On the plus side, Josh O'Connor was mesmerising, turning in a good performance. The music was good, if on occasion a tad overdramatic for the scene being played out. Some titters.
On the minus side, the tennis montages grew tedious, the time jumps a little too often, particularly towards the end of the film.
There was one scene in a locker room, where I could not understand a word that was being said, I thought it was not in English, but I could not understand the gist or the purpose. Very frustrating.
The film was too long (I saw people leave) and, dare I say it, a little pointless.
"Im doing this for both of us. You know that, right."
Idk if this was the straightest gay movie or the gayest straight movie.
Idk if this was the straightest gay movie or the gayest straight movie.
- The thing that stopped this film from feeling incredibly boring was the way it played with time.
- Took 30 minutes to slow down and breathe. But if it didb't, I would've given it half a star less.
- Bad acting in trailers, far from the case in the actual film. Trailers didn't sell me but this was a good movie. Wouldn't go back to it though.
- The trailers spoiled the midpoint.
- I think Tashi should've agreed to train Patrick as a way of tricking him to lose. I also thought the guys were the real ones playing Tashi. I was waiting for a flashback scene where the they plan the whole thing. That might've been generic but I also wasn't expecting a "hug and walk off into the sunset" type of ending.
The only reason I went to see this movie was to see if Zendaya could hang with the big dogs. To see if she can carry a film all by herself. She has the talent, she has the looks. She has it all. I think this movie is a good start to launch her career as a bonfide movie star. That being said, the movie itself was okay. Just okay. Not great, not bad but okay. I thought Zendaya was good. Her performance was something I expected, which I guess is a good thing. Didn't blow me out of the water but overall good. The actor who played Patrick, in my opinion did a great job. However everything else about this movie just fell short for me. Too much style and not enough substance.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPatrick taking a bite of the churro and letting Art take one was unscripted. Josh O'Connor was starving and it was the first time he ever had churros.
- BlooperAfter Patrick loses the second set in his final round match against Art and smashes his racket, the chair umpire declares a code violation point penalty; however, it should have been a game penalty, as Patrick had already received a point penalty earlier in the match (the scoreboard at the bottom accurately reflects the correct score).
- Citazioni
Tashi Donaldson: [after Patrick notices her engagement ring] It was his grandmother's.
Patrick Zweig: How is she?
Tashi Donaldson: She died. Stroke.
- Curiosità sui creditiOn the United States release of the film, the MGM logo appears after the brief opening prologue, and the roar of studio mascot, Leo the Lion, is silenced.
- ConnessioniFeatured in The 7PM Project: Episodio datato 26 marzo 2024 (2024)
- Colonne sonoreSound the Trumpet
Written by Henry Purcell
Performed by The Toronto Children's Chorus
Courtesy of Marquis Classics
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Challengers?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Desafiantes
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 55.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 50.119.408 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 15.011.061 USD
- 28 apr 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 96.119.408 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 11min(131 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti