VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,8/10
9318
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un aereo 767 viene dirottato e rischia un disastro imminente quando la sua scorta di carburante si esaurisce, con solo 97 minuti rimanenti.Un aereo 767 viene dirottato e rischia un disastro imminente quando la sua scorta di carburante si esaurisce, con solo 97 minuti rimanenti.Un aereo 767 viene dirottato e rischia un disastro imminente quando la sua scorta di carburante si esaurisce, con solo 97 minuti rimanenti.
Recensioni in evidenza
Pretty mediocre / bad movie in my opinion. It just throws you into it. No build up or anything. Alot of the events that happen doesnt even make sense, a watcher would question it and things are just rushed in. You dont get a feel for any of the characters so you wouldnt really care much about what happens to them really. The government immediately goes to drastic measures as soon as something went wrong?? In all its basic movie everythings really predictable so don expect much
But i can give props to the twist near the end tho.
And lastly the fact that the movie is called "97 Minutes" but it's only 93 minutes long is a bad sign lmao.
But i can give props to the twist near the end tho.
And lastly the fact that the movie is called "97 Minutes" but it's only 93 minutes long is a bad sign lmao.
I was hopeful at the start, because I was really into an action packed disaster movie, but from the very start I expected troubles ahead...
The bad: this movie is cheaply made and one can tell, Everything from the leading credits, to the sound, to the photography, all these technical aspects are way below average. It's quite cringeworthy to watch these cheap special effects, it's as if we are watching a seventies disaster movie, with lots of ridiculous fake effects.
More bad: what's even worse though is that the many supporting actors unintentionally are becoming a laughing stock, by the really terrible, yet funny way they (try) to act.
And as the final blow this movie simply never ever achieves to thrill for one mere second.
Not any good then? It's absolutely a new low for Alec Baldwin, who is starring in this disastrous flick. Although I must admit his performance was still kinda convincing, because he is still a good actor, running on lower ground though...
The bad: this movie is cheaply made and one can tell, Everything from the leading credits, to the sound, to the photography, all these technical aspects are way below average. It's quite cringeworthy to watch these cheap special effects, it's as if we are watching a seventies disaster movie, with lots of ridiculous fake effects.
More bad: what's even worse though is that the many supporting actors unintentionally are becoming a laughing stock, by the really terrible, yet funny way they (try) to act.
And as the final blow this movie simply never ever achieves to thrill for one mere second.
Not any good then? It's absolutely a new low for Alec Baldwin, who is starring in this disastrous flick. Although I must admit his performance was still kinda convincing, because he is still a good actor, running on lower ground though...
My god, avoid at all cost, cause if not it could provoke a heart attack.
I am sure if there was a go found me to be able to produce this film, Alec Baldwin most have been the biggest donor of the funds, otherwise this couldn't be released at all.
I mean, this is the baddest film of this year so far. Poor sound, bad script, scholars acting. The bad guys portrait as simple and bad as possible. The pilot's son is like a cartoon implant. The Doctor as many of the other characters are kind of extracted from a bad theatrical representation.
And I thought The Mother and Fast X were the baddest films this year. But this one surpass them by far.
I am sure if there was a go found me to be able to produce this film, Alec Baldwin most have been the biggest donor of the funds, otherwise this couldn't be released at all.
I mean, this is the baddest film of this year so far. Poor sound, bad script, scholars acting. The bad guys portrait as simple and bad as possible. The pilot's son is like a cartoon implant. The Doctor as many of the other characters are kind of extracted from a bad theatrical representation.
And I thought The Mother and Fast X were the baddest films this year. But this one surpass them by far.
If you could concoct a film that denied you all facts, that could relay a story in disjointed acts, where the edits and acting were cobbled and crude, where the outcomes can't be more distorted and skewed; then sit down, buckle up, as you're in for a ride, watch a plane that's been crippled, without effort just glide, listen in behind doors that can catch all you whisper, it's not long that you think they've all had a good snifter (the writers must have been three sheets at least); be afraid for the money that's been spent of defences, as tugging on wires can outfox all their senses (sight unseen!), be afraid, really worry, you might raise a red flag, if you meet terrorists, with a magical bag, out of which they can conjure an old Russian bomb, and deploy it like they're, in your favourite sitcom.
Seemed like a high school project. Not worth the time. Bad acting matched with low quality CGI. Its disappointing to see Hollywood heavy hitter Alec Baldwin participating in such low quality production. What I don't understand is why so many people would try and be a part of something that requires so much time and logistics to put together but put so less effort on making it work. Sad thing is I probably put more effort into writing this review than the producers put into making this film. Also, it would be nice if they didn't put fake ratings on movies like these to trick people into watching them.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThere are no red-eyes from Europe to the US. Hence it is impossible for a flight from Heathrow to arrive in New York at sunrise.
- BlooperThe storyline states: 'A hijacked 767 will crash in just 97 minutes when its fuel runs out', but a graphic in the opening sequence says the plane is 1100 miles from land, which would take two hours even when operating at the maximum listed cruising speed of 560 mph.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 97 Minutes?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- 97 Minutes
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Alton, Hampshire, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(on location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 7.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 539.536 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti