VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
712
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un teso istruttore di rafting perde i suoi clienti nelle acque umide e nelle foreste oscure di una valle fluviale incinta del paranormale.Un teso istruttore di rafting perde i suoi clienti nelle acque umide e nelle foreste oscure di una valle fluviale incinta del paranormale.Un teso istruttore di rafting perde i suoi clienti nelle acque umide e nelle foreste oscure di una valle fluviale incinta del paranormale.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 7 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Let me start by saying if you are ok with movies where you don't really quite get what happened at the end, then this movie would get a higher rating than I gave it. People in this movie sort of get 'possessed by the forest' for lack of any better way of describing it. A couple of the people that this happens to don't really seem to have any effects beyond just blacking out for a while, but if you go in this certain area of water, you're just messed up. I'm not completely sure what happens at the end...are the characters leaving or are they staying? I've seen worse movies, but I figured this one was going to be really good since it was Latvian and only had subtitles - how many Latvian films do we get to see in America, right? But I was wrong.... I found this mediocre at best.
I really liked the different approach this film took. When filming for a vegetarian sausage ad, members of the group wander into the forest. You get gaps, you don't know what happened at first. There's confusion and tension as you the viewer don't know what happened, or what is going on either.
The local guide is trying to find them and figure out what happened. You get snips of "found footage" but most of the film isn't in this style. The pacing in the 2nd half of the film isn't perfect, but overall I thought it was a really solid horror film. I really enjoyed it.
The location and cinematography is absolutely gorgeous too.
The local guide is trying to find them and figure out what happened. You get snips of "found footage" but most of the film isn't in this style. The pacing in the 2nd half of the film isn't perfect, but overall I thought it was a really solid horror film. I really enjoyed it.
The location and cinematography is absolutely gorgeous too.
This movie made no sense. I watched the whole thing and couldn't understand what was going on 95% of the time and it's just a horrible movie overall. I don't know what the plot was because it really didn't give a plot. The ending was just bizarre. The whole mystic River thing was just crazy, weird and the cabbage part was kind of odd as well. The ending itself made no sense because it was just the main character. Pretty much having a panic attack the whole time and the other party members were fine. It just made no sense at all as to what the movie was about and it. It's just a confusing mess is what it is.
This is one of those completely underrated films that you watch without any expectations and it ends up being a surprise, a good surprise. "Upurga", Latvian for "victim", is a very well-directed thriller. Despite being a simple film, Ugis Olte manages to construct a narrative that combines fable and cinematography in an "almost" great film, as I wrote in the title. It reminds a bit "The Blair Witch Project" or "Under The Skin". In fact, the film has a chain that generates a permanent feeling of continuity until the end and despite having a convincing ending, it seems like it could continue as if it were a series. It is interesting to see the difference in the dramaturgy of a little-known country like Latvia, both in the script, direction and acting, subtly different from the pasteurized cinema of the West but without the idiosyncrasies and corniness of more oriental works such as Korean or Arab ones. It's worth watching.
A bunch of young people go into a forest/river area, to film an adventure video with a vegan sausage somehow shoehorned into it. Everybody communicates as if it was their first time among other people. There's some mysterious flower blooming in the forest, that seemingly makes these people even weirder, a nut of a "sheriff" who tells you, that you can't urinate in "his" forest..so apparently the answer to a lifelong question "does the bear $h1t in the woods" - is a "No!", at least in this particular location. Who knew. There's another bunch of strange individuals, conducting some sort of iffy business and some other, cabbage fermenting gentleman and his wife. Two people wear a nose clip of some sort, but nobody else...there's not one normal person in the whole film. The film is a salad of random ideas - inserted - again, at random - minor characters, their stories and dialogues, shots, that add absolutely nothing.
There seems to be this trend, of making movies, especially "horror" movies, without any real conclusion, or even if it has some sort of ending, they don't show you, how it got there.
It's not as cute, as they think it is. Quite the opposite.
Imagine watching Star Wars where there would be no spaceships, no lightsabers etc shown. They would tell you - "yeah, so we travel between galaxies and stuff and we fight, but we won't show you how. Just imagine it, or whatever - and do our work for us - in your mind, it's cheaper that way and we don't have any ideas anyway."
Yeah, it wouldn't work very well, would it?
Almost everything would be half passable, meh acting, but it's low budget, so you expect that, even the non-ending would hurt way less, if it wasn't for the unbearable dialogues!
The fact, that non English speakers (maybe the actual actors themselves) dubbed the dialogues into "English", is totally fine, it kind of adds to the character. However, should you really write dialogues in a foreign language just using Google translate? Without having ANY native speaker to at least read through the script, before doing the voice-over.. Because that's exactly how the dialogues sounded. Maybe in Latvian, or whatever the original language was, it all sounded right, but in English it just didn't.
Don't get me wrong - all the words used in the film do exist, I've heard them all before, but never in this order. You know what they're trying to say, probably most of the time, but it's clear, that they've picked the wrong words and made up their own expressions.
I will put it this way - if you watched this movie on mute and without any subtitles, just for the visual, you'd probably get way more out of it. You'd try to imagine, why people act the way they do, you'd try to figure out what they're talking about - and you'd do a much better job, than the filmmakers did.
There seems to be this trend, of making movies, especially "horror" movies, without any real conclusion, or even if it has some sort of ending, they don't show you, how it got there.
It's not as cute, as they think it is. Quite the opposite.
Imagine watching Star Wars where there would be no spaceships, no lightsabers etc shown. They would tell you - "yeah, so we travel between galaxies and stuff and we fight, but we won't show you how. Just imagine it, or whatever - and do our work for us - in your mind, it's cheaper that way and we don't have any ideas anyway."
Yeah, it wouldn't work very well, would it?
Almost everything would be half passable, meh acting, but it's low budget, so you expect that, even the non-ending would hurt way less, if it wasn't for the unbearable dialogues!
The fact, that non English speakers (maybe the actual actors themselves) dubbed the dialogues into "English", is totally fine, it kind of adds to the character. However, should you really write dialogues in a foreign language just using Google translate? Without having ANY native speaker to at least read through the script, before doing the voice-over.. Because that's exactly how the dialogues sounded. Maybe in Latvian, or whatever the original language was, it all sounded right, but in English it just didn't.
Don't get me wrong - all the words used in the film do exist, I've heard them all before, but never in this order. You know what they're trying to say, probably most of the time, but it's clear, that they've picked the wrong words and made up their own expressions.
I will put it this way - if you watched this movie on mute and without any subtitles, just for the visual, you'd probably get way more out of it. You'd try to imagine, why people act the way they do, you'd try to figure out what they're talking about - and you'd do a much better job, than the filmmakers did.
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperIn the opening scene, a kayaker is trapped under a log in a fast-flowing river. Bizarrely, they have their head under the log, with one arm either side. A rescuer then tries to pull them up on the upstream side of the log. This would force them to pull against the current. If they pulled upwards on the other arm they would harness the power of the water to help them.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- River of Fear
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 125.000 € (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 25 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Il fiume del terrore (2021) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi