Alice Gilman sta scappando da un passato violento. Cerca rifugio a casa di Hannah; una dimora storica con un passato inquietante. Determinata a dimostrare la possibilità di dimensioni altern... Leggi tuttoAlice Gilman sta scappando da un passato violento. Cerca rifugio a casa di Hannah; una dimora storica con un passato inquietante. Determinata a dimostrare la possibilità di dimensioni alternative, apre una porta verso l'orrore.Alice Gilman sta scappando da un passato violento. Cerca rifugio a casa di Hannah; una dimora storica con un passato inquietante. Determinata a dimostrare la possibilità di dimensioni alternative, apre una porta verso l'orrore.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 9 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Portia Chellelynn
- Alice Gilman
- (as Michelle Morris)
Andrea Collins
- Keziah Mason
- (as Andie Noir)
David Bailey
- Bookkeeper
- (as David 'Beetle' Bailey)
Recensioni in evidenza
Another "Adaption" of a H. P. Lovecraft short story, and once again the writers have no real idea what the story is about and therefore create a new story an attribute it to Lovecraft to get an audience.
They take a few salient points (student, math, other dimensions, stolen children) and write a story.
This story has a female lead. She is working on the principle that right mathematics and geometry can create a portal to other detentions. Because an ex is seeking to get her, her professor sends her to a remote house for her safety. This of coarse puts her right in the sights of an occult group seeking to resurrect a long dead witch.
The reminder of the film is a collection of events to bring this about.
Save your tine and read the original H. P. Lovecraft.
They take a few salient points (student, math, other dimensions, stolen children) and write a story.
This story has a female lead. She is working on the principle that right mathematics and geometry can create a portal to other detentions. Because an ex is seeking to get her, her professor sends her to a remote house for her safety. This of coarse puts her right in the sights of an occult group seeking to resurrect a long dead witch.
The reminder of the film is a collection of events to bring this about.
Save your tine and read the original H. P. Lovecraft.
Man, real poor writing left green actors stranded! Im not sure why alot of movies are getting made with bad sound as well. The sound in this movie is real bad. I was up & down on the volue button the entire time!
Lady goes & stays at a large house, oh like 3 folks live there and the only availanle room is the attic? Ok. So she is researching portholes and how geometry facors into it. From there the story line unfolds like LSD. Half assed plot, scenes are all over the place, at times unrelated, as though the movie is about randon visuals.
There is some very nice camera work, the location is nice. Unfortunately the bad outweighs the good here.
Directors & Producers might consider having an impartial outsider look at their dailys to offer input. Clearly this is another example of how ego blinds a person.
Lady goes & stays at a large house, oh like 3 folks live there and the only availanle room is the attic? Ok. So she is researching portholes and how geometry facors into it. From there the story line unfolds like LSD. Half assed plot, scenes are all over the place, at times unrelated, as though the movie is about randon visuals.
There is some very nice camera work, the location is nice. Unfortunately the bad outweighs the good here.
Directors & Producers might consider having an impartial outsider look at their dailys to offer input. Clearly this is another example of how ego blinds a person.
If you want to waste some time then I guess you could watch this.
Rated 2 only because of obligatory sex scene, could have contained more nudity to make it worth the watch but it starts out like a bad p0rn0 anyway the acting is that tinny.
I've managed to watch just over half and it's a task to try and finish the film.
I've seen TV series do better interpretations of H. P. Lovecraft, Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet Of Curiosities is a million percent better than this shambles
This could have been an awesome film if only the budget was not so low and the lighting for some reason is so dark its hard to make out what's happening, maybe that's a bonus.
Rated 2 only because of obligatory sex scene, could have contained more nudity to make it worth the watch but it starts out like a bad p0rn0 anyway the acting is that tinny.
I've managed to watch just over half and it's a task to try and finish the film.
I've seen TV series do better interpretations of H. P. Lovecraft, Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet Of Curiosities is a million percent better than this shambles
This could have been an awesome film if only the budget was not so low and the lighting for some reason is so dark its hard to make out what's happening, maybe that's a bonus.
Usually I reserve one star reviews to things so bad as to be funny. I wanted to rate this 0 stars, though, as in bad as to not be worth being called a film.
Why do they use Lovecraft stories in idiotic student quality movies? Because they are out of copyright. And therefore morally, creatively and financially bankrupt people attach their filth to Lovecraft's name simply because they can.
You can see how Lovecraftian this story is when I tell you the protagonist is a bisexual physics student moving in the attic of a house because some guy was stalking her. She moves around in her underwear, she has sex with a girl in the house, the starts dreaming of dark rituals, there is even a kind of tentacle rape scene in it. The only thing remotely Lovecraft is the rats, which in his works would have inspired loathing and disgust, but in this movie they are just really cute.
The sound is atrocious, the acting really bad, the plot nonsensical, there is no horror (except the gory desecration of Lovecraft's name), the editing is stupid and there is no directing to speak of.
Bottom line: I think the guy just wanted to have sex with young actresses. Avoid this like the plague.
Why do they use Lovecraft stories in idiotic student quality movies? Because they are out of copyright. And therefore morally, creatively and financially bankrupt people attach their filth to Lovecraft's name simply because they can.
You can see how Lovecraftian this story is when I tell you the protagonist is a bisexual physics student moving in the attic of a house because some guy was stalking her. She moves around in her underwear, she has sex with a girl in the house, the starts dreaming of dark rituals, there is even a kind of tentacle rape scene in it. The only thing remotely Lovecraft is the rats, which in his works would have inspired loathing and disgust, but in this movie they are just really cute.
The sound is atrocious, the acting really bad, the plot nonsensical, there is no horror (except the gory desecration of Lovecraft's name), the editing is stupid and there is no directing to speak of.
Bottom line: I think the guy just wanted to have sex with young actresses. Avoid this like the plague.
The only award this movie should have received, is The Worst Movie of All Time Award. I am so sorry I wasted 1.5 hours watching this. Rented it on Amazon Prime and it is available for another 47 hours....yay!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAlice's mathematical research into other dimensions includes the "Witch of Agnesi" (Versiera di Agnesi), a graphical curve, whose name arises (fortuitously for the film's subject matter) from a mistranslation of 'versiera' (witch, she-devil), which has the same spelling as the word for a rope used to move a sail.
- Curiosità sui creditiPre-credits title card: "The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of a black sea of the infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far." - H.P. Lovecraft
- Colonne sonoreAu clair de la lune
(uncredited)
French folk song
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is H.P. Lovecraft's Witch House?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Ведьмовский дом Г. Ф. Лавкрафта
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 22min(82 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti