Un adolescente e una ragazza cambiano per sempre le loro vite quando un incendio in California risveglia una terrificante creatura soprannaturale. Al sorgere della luna piena, tutti gli adol... Leggi tuttoUn adolescente e una ragazza cambiano per sempre le loro vite quando un incendio in California risveglia una terrificante creatura soprannaturale. Al sorgere della luna piena, tutti gli adolescenti si uniscono per svelare il segreto.Un adolescente e una ragazza cambiano per sempre le loro vite quando un incendio in California risveglia una terrificante creatura soprannaturale. Al sorgere della luna piena, tutti gli adolescenti si uniscono per svelare il segreto.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
I liked this. The show features teenaged protagonists (who clearly aren't teenagers, but whatever) but is clearly not intended for an audience too young. The physical damage shown to individuals eliminates that, unless the US ratings board has completely lost the plot in that regard.
The acting was decent. The writing and direction managed to convey a lot in the single hour.
Keep in mind that this is episode one. Its purpose is to entice and draw you in, so I fully expect the pace to calm down in the next episode. I hope it doesn't though.
Shows take time to get their legs. So do directors, writers and actors. It has potential, and it has Buffy.
The acting was decent. The writing and direction managed to convey a lot in the single hour.
Keep in mind that this is episode one. Its purpose is to entice and draw you in, so I fully expect the pace to calm down in the next episode. I hope it doesn't though.
Shows take time to get their legs. So do directors, writers and actors. It has potential, and it has Buffy.
I don't understand the amount of super low rated reviews. Most of the low reviews I've seen pre-judged the show and gave 1 star because it wasn't what they were expecting (I also noticed that many of them were written after the reviewer had only seen the premiere episode, which imo really does not give the show a fair chance). This is a teen show for sure. For people coming just for SMG, it is not the new Buffy, but that doesn't mean it's bad. The horror is on par with a lot of other teen shows that deal with supernatural/horror element, but it's definitely at a 13PG/14A level. I think the show has a lot of room to grow, which is a good thing. My only qualm is a want more SMG, but now that we're deeper in the season I think her role is definitely starting to expand.
Minor SPOILERS for Buffy fans: SMG's role in this show very much gives me the experience of a what-if scenario where an alternative dimension Buffy joined The Initiative for good and is using the arson detective role as an undercover tactic, cause there is 100% more to her character than we currently know at the ep. 6 mark.
Overall I'm interesting to see how the show /story evolves.
Minor SPOILERS for Buffy fans: SMG's role in this show very much gives me the experience of a what-if scenario where an alternative dimension Buffy joined The Initiative for good and is using the arson detective role as an undercover tactic, cause there is 100% more to her character than we currently know at the ep. 6 mark.
Overall I'm interesting to see how the show /story evolves.
Is this a masterpiece? No but it does build up with some potential. Is Sarah Michelle Gellar used to lure people in? Absolutely, but after that brief cameo in the first episode she is just as prominent a character as the four teenagers.
Yes this might be a teen drama at times, the main characters are in high school after all, but it is more palatable than Teen Wolf was.
If you are going to try this sit through until at least episode four. At that point the story really starts to play out and build up. Having watched the eight episodes I'm curious how much they wandered from the original book series by Edo von Belkam.
Yes this might be a teen drama at times, the main characters are in high school after all, but it is more palatable than Teen Wolf was.
If you are going to try this sit through until at least episode four. At that point the story really starts to play out and build up. Having watched the eight episodes I'm curious how much they wandered from the original book series by Edo von Belkam.
There are a lot of good things about this show.
The four core characters all have their individual personalities and issues that are very common among that age group but not always highlighted very well, so points for this.
The parental struggles of wanting to protect your children but not sure what to do and completely winging it.
Sara Michelle Gellar was my reason for giving this a go and I'm glad I did, her performance is great as is the rest of the cast and the storyline has a lot of potential so I hope the writers do it justice going forward. When I began watching I was on the fence and found it slow at first but I kept going and I was hooked by episode 4 and each episode since has gotten better and better.
The four core characters all have their individual personalities and issues that are very common among that age group but not always highlighted very well, so points for this.
The parental struggles of wanting to protect your children but not sure what to do and completely winging it.
Sara Michelle Gellar was my reason for giving this a go and I'm glad I did, her performance is great as is the rest of the cast and the storyline has a lot of potential so I hope the writers do it justice going forward. When I began watching I was on the fence and found it slow at first but I kept going and I was hooked by episode 4 and each episode since has gotten better and better.
There are obviously people posting on here who just enjoy giving bad reviews. No, this show won't win an Emmy anytime soon, but it's solidly entertaining. The special effects weren't bad, and while I won't give anything away, the plot line is promising if you're into the supernatural. For reference, I watched the first two episodes of the show.
I'm really not understanding the people coming on here to complain about the show featuring teenagers or about werewolf shows having been done before. Um, duh - these things were obvious from the previews and any write-ups of the show. If this isn't for you, why watch it?
My negatives are the super cheesy sex scenes and the actors - particularly Harlin and Blake - being a bit wooden. They're not acting Shakespeare, though, so it's not a huge deal.
I'm really not understanding the people coming on here to complain about the show featuring teenagers or about werewolf shows having been done before. Um, duh - these things were obvious from the previews and any write-ups of the show. If this isn't for you, why watch it?
My negatives are the super cheesy sex scenes and the actors - particularly Harlin and Blake - being a bit wooden. They're not acting Shakespeare, though, so it's not a huge deal.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizExecutive producer Sarah Michelle Gellar was highly protective of her younger costars in this series. A staff member was reportedly fired due to inappropriate behavior during production. As described by herself in an interview, her work was "to set up an infrastructure for the younger cast. Something that I know for sure that I didn't have on any of my jobs."Note:the "inappropriate behavior"in question is that the staff member was offering one of the teenage actors unsolicited back rubs.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Wolf Pack have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Вовча зграя
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione53 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti