Sex crimes 4 - Il crimine è ancora più seducente

Saw this on a "pre-screening" it seems. Wasn't really expecting anything, but hoping for some kind of titillation, having seen the first in the series.

Well, the movie started with some bikini babes and a poorly edited speed boat race which didn't really give me high hopes, but as the movie progressed I found myself getting more and more sucked in.

There was at least one scene to satisfy the sex maniacs, but overall the movie concentrated on beautiful people, and a murder mystery type plot with some nice twists and turns. Along with nice Florida weather and scenery.

Overall the movie was very entertaining and nicely photographed. The stars, although pretty much unknown, seem like they could all continue on to bigger better things, especially the girls who've all obviously been spending a lot of time in the gym in addition to their already having gifted gene-pools.

Definitely worth seeing, but don't expect too much needless to say. Its like a very good TV movie.

The first "Wild things" was hardy a classic . Nobody really wanted a sequel, but Hollywood still made 2 crappy straight to DVD movies. The sequels were INCREDIBLY LAZY. They were basically remakes of the first movie only with small changes in script and of course anonymous cast . I guess they did make some money , because Hollywood made one more.

What's the difference between this movie and the earlier ones ? Hint: it's in the title. Yep, guy has a sex with 3 women this time , not with 2. The rest ? EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST THE SAME. If you find this movie to be clever or surprising , well , then clearly something is wrong with you.

The first movie had Kevin Bacon , Bill Murray , Denise Richards and Neve Campbell. Good actors and hot women. The sex scene was great and there was quite a lot of erotic tension too.

Here the direction is unremarkable , the screenplay is flat and predictable. There is only one sex scene here (the foursome) and although it's nice it can't hold a candle to the original threesome from the first movie. The girls are quite pretty , but when it comes to acting ,wait , what acting ? The only actor from this movie that interested me was a guy named Ashley Parker Angel. This dude should seriously change his name , unless he is interested in making career in porn.

I don't remember too much from this movie. The whole movie is so uninspired and uninteresting that I can recommend it only for sex maniacs (who probably were the main target for this movie anyway). I give it 1/10.

I recently watched Wild Things: Foursome (2010) on Tubi. The storyline follows a young man whose father dies, leaving his fortune in a trust fund for the son to access later. The son gets into legal trouble that leads him to need the funds. He enters into a shotgun wedding to allow his wife to access the money, hoping to get him out of trouble. Meanwhile, a dangerous game of cat and mouse ensues over the money and the young man's freedom.

This film is directed by Andy Hurst (Evolver) and stars Jillian Murray (Cabin Fever 3: Patient Zero), Marnette Patterson (American Sniper), John Schneider (The Dukes of Hazzard) and Ashley Parker Angel (Longshot).

Wild Things: Foursome is fairly consistent with the last two films in the series, making the storyline predictable for those who watched them. The actresses are gorgeous, but there's less nudity than the previous films, mostly limited to bootie shots. The acting ranges from average to poor, and the script and dialogue are inconsistently authentic. There is a fun twist at the end, and a stabbing during a fight scene was the highlight of the movie for me.

In conclusion, Wild Things: Foursome continues to demonstrate why we didn't need a sequel after the first film. I would score this a 3/10 and recommend skipping it.

The detective in this is one of the better things in this, but also one of it's weak links. Then again, I don't think anyone will watch this, trying to figure out, which one is the better actor in here. Still pretty decent acting going on overall (that does not include everyone in the cast), even though the cast does not wear that much during the movies duration.

Of course, I'd advice you to watch the first one. This is already the 3-rd cash-in, though as I've said, it seems as bit of an improvement to the other two "sequels" (they are not, just re-telling the story of the first one). I wonder if a fifth part, will top the "erotic" scene with a fifth member. Then again, it was pretty obvious that one actress had a "no nudity" clause in her contract. But I don't think that will put you off.

While pretty silly (no pun intended), it might be funny at times for you, depending what you expect.

(2009) Wild Things: Foursome THRILLER/ DRAMA

You know a movie is bad when it starts off with a bunch of teens getting excited over a couple of yuppies playing foosball on a sunny resort near a pool! And like the other "Wild Things" films known for it's twists, it's still quite bad with it's mediocre acting from a bunch of wannabes and a fake making out scene involving a single guy and three other girls, hence the title! Centers on a father who was killed in a racing accident and the spoiled brat of a teenage son finding a way to collect it's inheritance. Even after showing the film's credits making everything to make sense, one still has to go through all the bad acting and idiocy that makes things that turn out the way they do possible.