Sex crimes 4 - Il crimine è ancora più seducente

Ted Wheetly is one the richest men in Florida. When he dies during a car race, his irresponsible and partying son Carson stands to inherit it all, as the wife died mysteriously. But old Ted knew about his son so he put all the money in a trust fund that Carson can access when he becomes 30, unless there is a medical emergency or a wedding. That gives Carson's girlfriend Rachel ideas. Yet, Carson doesn't want to get married. Until his hand is forced. Rachel and another girl he met during a party named Brandi devise a plan where Brandi accuses him of rape. That forces the executor of the will to free up some cash to buy her off. Once she drops the charges, Carson and Rachel marry.

This being a Wild Things movie, things aren't gong to stay just like that. Everyone is scheming to get the money. But they didn't count on a persistent cop who keeps digging into the strange car accident, on the relationship of all the kids, who to avoid drawing suspicion have to pretend they don't know each other all that well. That leads the cop to the discovery that Rachel and Brandi were childhood friends living in the swamps who always dreamed of moving up north and meeting a rich guy. Things get complicated for the cop until both girls walk into his office to implicate the other. And just as you think things have sorted themselves out, there are more twists.

Wild Things: Foursome keeps the tradition of having an attractive cast in beautiful Florida doing all sorts of naughty things to get a lot money. Jillian Murray, Marnette Patterson, Jessie Nickson are the pretty wild things this time around, and they are gorgeous to look at. Performances are very good, Marnette does a superb job and so does John Schneider, yes, THE John Schneider, who plays the cop. The story is interesting and you really do get into as you want to find out just how it all turns out. There is one highly erotic scene that give the movie its subtitle. Very worth seeing.

The first "Wild things" was hardy a classic . Nobody really wanted a sequel, but Hollywood still made 2 crappy straight to DVD movies. The sequels were INCREDIBLY LAZY. They were basically remakes of the first movie only with small changes in script and of course anonymous cast . I guess they did make some money , because Hollywood made one more.

What's the difference between this movie and the earlier ones ? Hint: it's in the title. Yep, guy has a sex with 3 women this time , not with 2. The rest ? EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST THE SAME. If you find this movie to be clever or surprising , well , then clearly something is wrong with you.

The first movie had Kevin Bacon , Bill Murray , Denise Richards and Neve Campbell. Good actors and hot women. The sex scene was great and there was quite a lot of erotic tension too.

Here the direction is unremarkable , the screenplay is flat and predictable. There is only one sex scene here (the foursome) and although it's nice it can't hold a candle to the original threesome from the first movie. The girls are quite pretty , but when it comes to acting ,wait , what acting ? The only actor from this movie that interested me was a guy named Ashley Parker Angel. This dude should seriously change his name , unless he is interested in making career in porn.

I don't remember too much from this movie. The whole movie is so uninspired and uninteresting that I can recommend it only for sex maniacs (who probably were the main target for this movie anyway). I give it 1/10.

With the last entry in the beloved Wild Things franchise, this fourth film sees this seemingly similar to the previous. At this point, had you watched the previous three films or only even the original, you would know the first major twist of the film (they all essentially follow the same basic formula) where by this point nothing is surprising. We are simply just waiting for it to occur.

Wild Things: Foursome, as suggested but its title would include another woman in its recurring and predictable famous "scene". This time, the director does include more skin in the scene and for a longer running time than at least the previous two instalments. Around 32:00 - 35:00 were it occurs.

This film of course isn't as good as the original but it is an improvement over the third film. The lead actor is solid enough and the leading women show stronger acting and have more character development and overall interest than the leading women in the third film.

The end final twists get a little messy and convoluted and by that point we don't exactly care but it was slightly enjoyable watching the post credit scenes with the flashbacks.

Let's face it. The "Wild Things" films are never going to be confused with serious, art house cinema. They are lots of fun to watch though and if you are in a mood for escapist fare, they fit the bill just fine. The latest entry "Wild Things: Foursome" follows the formula of drop dead gorgeous women, eroticism, double crossing, slick production, and moody music. I rather liked this entry. The performances are pretty good, especially by veteran actor John Schneider, and I got a kick out of the multiple twists in the plot. The Florida location is also put to good use. It's not surprising that all of the "Wild Things" movies have been shot there. It will be interesting to see if they come up with a fifth film. Recommended.

I recently watched Wild Things: Foursome (2010) on Tubi. The storyline follows a young man whose father dies, leaving his fortune in a trust fund for the son to access later. The son gets into legal trouble that leads him to need the funds. He enters into a shotgun wedding to allow his wife to access the money, hoping to get him out of trouble. Meanwhile, a dangerous game of cat and mouse ensues over the money and the young man's freedom.

This film is directed by Andy Hurst (Evolver) and stars Jillian Murray (Cabin Fever 3: Patient Zero), Marnette Patterson (American Sniper), John Schneider (The Dukes of Hazzard) and Ashley Parker Angel (Longshot).

Wild Things: Foursome is fairly consistent with the last two films in the series, making the storyline predictable for those who watched them. The actresses are gorgeous, but there's less nudity than the previous films, mostly limited to bootie shots. The acting ranges from average to poor, and the script and dialogue are inconsistently authentic. There is a fun twist at the end, and a stabbing during a fight scene was the highlight of the movie for me.

In conclusion, Wild Things: Foursome continues to demonstrate why we didn't need a sequel after the first film. I would score this a 3/10 and recommend skipping it.