Attacco glaciale

Titolo originale: Arctic Blast

2010
1h 32min

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

3,9/10

4268

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Riproduci trailer2:05

1 video

13 foto

Avventura Azione Disastro Dramma Fantascienza Thriller

Quando un'eclissi solare invia una colossale esplosione di aria super fredda verso la terra, scatena una catastrofica catena di eventi che minaccia d'inghiottire il mondo nel ghiaccio e d'in... Leggi tuttoQuando un'eclissi solare invia una colossale esplosione di aria super fredda verso la terra, scatena una catastrofica catena di eventi che minaccia d'inghiottire il mondo nel ghiaccio e d'iniziare una nuova era glaciale.Quando un'eclissi solare invia una colossale esplosione di aria super fredda verso la terra, scatena una catastrofica catena di eventi che minaccia d'inghiottire il mondo nel ghiaccio e d'iniziare una nuova era glaciale.

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

3,9/10

4268

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

Video1

Trailer 2:05

Arctic Blast

Foto12

+ 9

Recensioni degli utenti66

3,94.2K

Recensioni in evidenza

1jim-penny

Funny for all the wrong reasons.

First of all, let me start by saying that 1 star is more generous than I'd like to be, however I'll award that one star for the comedy of errors.

Who did the research for this movie? Honestly - giving insulin to a person with low blood sugar (a dangerous thing for somebody to learn from a movie) and that complete nonsense about the mesosphere falling. I doubt if it was a school kid because they are generally more educated than this. It scored an F minus on the science.

The Australian accents were either fake or overdone. The direction was abysmal. What an embarrassment for the local emergency services to be involved in this movie.

The acting was high-school grade for the most part. They obviously had a couple of professional actors.

The special effects looked like something out of the old Batman TV series or Power Rangers.

To think that I paid money for this. It's honestly challenging the position of Santa Claus conquers the Martians as worst movie yet.

When it gets to the stage where you're laughing at how amateurish a movie is, it's just not worth it.

1aaron-973-713741

My Word!!!!!

Half way through this film i hoped that the "Arctic Blast" would consume me and put me out of my misery! I watched this movie for amusement entertainment value only! it truly was appalling! the effects and the cast were indeed the worst i have ever seen, I would rate this as a J-K rather than a B movie!!!! I especially loved it around 36 minutes in when the cold front attacks the beach and the lead characters! there is a "fogs eye" view which is sceeearrreeeyyy!!! OK its not but again this film just makes me laugh, laugh, laugh! I would highly recommend it to groups staying in for a slumber party as it would at least encourage you to get drunk to cope!

1gallloping

Don't waste your time

I was extremely disappointed with this movie. Basic common denominators were forgotten when making this film. ie. A vehicle will not start at - 100 especially if you live in a country where gasoline isn't treated to endure freezing temperatures. Also you could not brush the ice off a windshield.... You would be scraping a very long time; when it's cold you would see your breath; these are some basic but important realities that were totally overlooked in this film. I'm guessing the makers of this movie have never actually experienced living in a cold climate and understanding the reality of it. This movie was much too unrealistic and anyone thinking about watching it think again.

5shroyerw-1

Scientifically inaccurate, but entertaining.

If you were irritated by the fact that Jack & Rose's path through the Titanic couldn't possibly have happened as they went through rooms that didn't even connect and doors that weren't even there and parts of the ship that were on entirely opposite sides without having to cross through the middle, then you won't like this movie.

It's definitely a made-for-TV type of movie and it's definitely modeled after "The Day after Tomorrow" (almost character-for-character). The science is rather atrocious, also, but if you yourself -are- scientifically illiterate or if you're just used to scientific illiteracy in cinema and therefore unphased by it, then you might like this flick. I was surprised to see SG1's Michael Shanks in what seemed to all appearances to be third-rate billing, but he was in it and he played as well as he ever does.

I'd recommend this if you're really kinda' reaching for something to watch, and you're not feeling too picky and SyFy made-for-TV quality is acceptable to you (I don't think it's a SyFy flick, but it's the same general quality). If you're into serious flicks, or if you don't care to see another "Day After Tomorrow", steer clear.

charles000

This is the quintessential bottom feeding, below low end, cheesiest, unintended comedy disaster film of all time

"Easily one of the worst movies of all time. I'm understating it."

No disagreement here!!!

This is the quintessential "Plan 9 From Outer Space" (for everyone familiar with this alltime classic low budget scifi film) of disaster genre' films.

Every hackneyed cliché' that could possibly be imagined was tossed into this thing . . . sort of like a mental indigestion.

I can only imagine what was going on at the set while they were actually shooting film for this thing.

The actors and film crew must have been barely able to keep from constantly laughing as they attempted to say their lines and plod their way through these evermore, beyond ridiculous scenes.

Either that, or everyone must have been smoking "something" during this entire escapade.

Come to think of it, the behind the scenes, "the making of . . . " footage of this unintended comedy extraordinaire actually might have been truly entertaining to watch, certainly more interesting than the actual film itself.

Trust me on this one . . . do not spend any money, as in none, zero, nada to see this clunker, unless, of course, one has a particular fetish for exceedingly bad films.

OK, I kept this as polite and civil as possible.

Altri elementi simili

3,8

Tempesta polare

4,1

Tempesta di ghiaccio

3,3

Metal Tornado

5,1

Hurricane - Allerta uragano

4,4

Flight World War II

6,3

Hours

3,6

Meteor Assault

4,5

CAT-8: Tempesta solare

3,2

Dark storm

3,8

Force of impact - Impatto mortale

5,4

Geostorm

4,0

21-12-2012 La profezia dei Maya

Trama

Modifica

Lo sapevi?

Modifica

Quiz
Due to its filming location, this is the first full length feature film to be filmed in Hobart Tasmania Australia and its surrounds.

Blooper
The premise of the movie is incorrect. The ozone layer blocks harmful UltraViolet C light, which is a very important function to most life on this planet, since UVC destroys DNA (The higher the frequency the worse it is. UVA gives you a tan, UVB gives you melanoma, UVC kills everything), but Ozone is not a barrier preventing the cold of the mesosphere from reaching the ground ... that's mainly Air Pressure and Convection ... Warmer air rises, and air moves from high pressure to low pressure areas.

Ozone is an oxygen molecule with three single linked oxygen atoms in a triangle rather than two double linked atoms, and the photo-chemical reaction of oxygen to ozone and back is what absorbs the UVC wavelength energy. The ozone layer is between 12 and 19 miles above the earth, but if it were compressed to the atmospheric pressure at sea level, it would only be about 3 millimeters thick. The danger in a "rift" or hole in the ozone layer is rapid sunburn, possible genetic damage/mutation, or death depending on exposure level. for many years there has been a hole in the ozone layer in the southern hemisphere. it expands and contracts yearly, and most years it slowly moves around between Antarctica and the southern ocean and during other years it spans the entire Antarctic continent.